|
The failed Obama administration
wrote in message
... On Jan 22, 1:04 pm, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: You like 60 Minutes??? Aren't you people being instructed by the Garlique salesman to hate CBS? And, it appears we agree on BBC, although you pretended not to notice that when you claimed not to like my sources.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - You really need to start to read. I did not say anywhere I did not like the BBC.. ==================== No, but when I mentioned it, you dissed it. Nope, never did that and you know it... ==================== I simply noted that your stated sources limit you to one point of view. As to CBS, I don't always agree, but I watch for the same reasons I watch Chris Matthews, I am interested in all viewpoints, not just the ones I agree with. That is the difference between me and folks like you and Harry... I don't consider any part of the country "fly over", I want to be informed, even if it changes my opinion.. ==================== Most of your sources involve sitting and watching. I need to receive information at a higher rate of speed. I have an actual life from 6:00 AM until midnight most days. More excuses, you don't know what I do or where I work. Yes, I happen to be able to watch news while I am working, so what? So, where do you get your news at "a high rate of speed"? I mean, you already dismissed 15 second news clips, or doesn't that count for you. Fact is Joe, like most far left liberals, you limit your input, guess it's easier that way, but it still leaves you terribly uninformed... ================ Reading is one way of getting news at a much higher rate of speed than television, which wastes time with commercials. I'll make you a deal: Find 10 news stories which you think I haven't been exposed to. Find them via YOUR news sources, even if all you give me is a one-line description of the TV story. If I can't find 8 out of 10 via my sources and prove it to you, then you're correct. Start early Saturday. I won't have time to play until then. |
The failed Obama administration
On Jan 22, 1:32*pm, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote:
wrote in message ... On Jan 22, 1:04 pm, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: You like 60 Minutes??? Aren't you people being instructed by the Garlique salesman to hate CBS? And, it appears we agree on BBC, although you pretended not to notice that when you claimed not to like my sources.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - You really need to start to read. I did not say anywhere I did not like the BBC.. ==================== No, but when I mentioned it, you dissed it. Nope, never did that and you know it... ==================== I simply noted that your stated sources limit you to one point of view. As to CBS, I don't always agree, but I watch for the same reasons I watch Chris Matthews, I am interested in all viewpoints, not just the ones I agree with. That is the difference between me and folks like you and Harry... I don't consider any part of the country "fly over", I want to be informed, even if it changes my opinion.. ==================== Most of your sources involve sitting and watching. I need to receive information at a higher rate of speed. I have an actual life from 6:00 AM until midnight most days. More excuses, you don't know what I do or where I work. Yes, I happen to be able to watch news while I am working, so what? So, where do you get your news at "a high rate of speed"? *I mean, you already dismissed 15 second news clips, or doesn't that count for you. Fact is Joe, like most far left liberals, you limit your input, guess it's easier that way, but it still leaves you terribly uninformed... ================ Reading is one way of getting news at a much higher rate of speed than television, which wastes time with commercials. I'll make you a deal: Find 10 news stories which you think I haven't been exposed to. Find them via YOUR news sources, even if all you give me is a one-line description of the TV story. If I can't find 8 out of 10 via my sources and prove it to you, then you're correct. Start early Saturday. I won't have time to play until then. Pfffftttt.... |
The failed Obama administration
wrote in message
... On Jan 22, 1:04 pm, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: You like 60 Minutes??? Aren't you people being instructed by the Garlique salesman to hate CBS? And, it appears we agree on BBC, although you pretended not to notice that when you claimed not to like my sources.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - You really need to start to read. I did not say anywhere I did not like the BBC.. ==================== No, but when I mentioned it, you dissed it. Nope, never did that and you know it... ==================== I simply noted that your stated sources limit you to one point of view. As to CBS, I don't always agree, but I watch for the same reasons I watch Chris Matthews, I am interested in all viewpoints, not just the ones I agree with. That is the difference between me and folks like you and Harry... I don't consider any part of the country "fly over", I want to be informed, even if it changes my opinion.. ==================== Most of your sources involve sitting and watching. I need to receive information at a higher rate of speed. I have an actual life from 6:00 AM until midnight most days. More excuses, you don't know what I do or where I work. Yes, I happen to be able to watch news while I am working, so what? So, where do you get your news at "a high rate of speed"? I mean, you already dismissed 15 second news clips, or doesn't that count for you. Fact is Joe, like most far left liberals, you limit your input, guess it's easier that way, but it still leaves you terribly uninformed... ================ By the way, my day job keeps me on the phone all day long. No TV possible. After dinner, I'm usually practicing music. No TV possible. Reading is my primary source of news, and you have no problem with that unless you invent one. Radio comes next. |
The failed Obama administration
wrote in message
... On Jan 22, 1:32 pm, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: wrote in message ... On Jan 22, 1:04 pm, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: You like 60 Minutes??? Aren't you people being instructed by the Garlique salesman to hate CBS? And, it appears we agree on BBC, although you pretended not to notice that when you claimed not to like my sources.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - You really need to start to read. I did not say anywhere I did not like the BBC.. ==================== No, but when I mentioned it, you dissed it. Nope, never did that and you know it... ==================== I simply noted that your stated sources limit you to one point of view. As to CBS, I don't always agree, but I watch for the same reasons I watch Chris Matthews, I am interested in all viewpoints, not just the ones I agree with. That is the difference between me and folks like you and Harry... I don't consider any part of the country "fly over", I want to be informed, even if it changes my opinion.. ==================== Most of your sources involve sitting and watching. I need to receive information at a higher rate of speed. I have an actual life from 6:00 AM until midnight most days. More excuses, you don't know what I do or where I work. Yes, I happen to be able to watch news while I am working, so what? So, where do you get your news at "a high rate of speed"? I mean, you already dismissed 15 second news clips, or doesn't that count for you. Fact is Joe, like most far left liberals, you limit your input, guess it's easier that way, but it still leaves you terribly uninformed... ================ Reading is one way of getting news at a much higher rate of speed than television, which wastes time with commercials. I'll make you a deal: Find 10 news stories which you think I haven't been exposed to. Find them via YOUR news sources, even if all you give me is a one-line description of the TV story. If I can't find 8 out of 10 via my sources and prove it to you, then you're correct. Start early Saturday. I won't have time to play until then. Pfffftttt.... ============= OK. Give me one story. Just one. If you refuse, then you've admitted that your claim was pure nonsense. One news story which you think is exclusive to your magical sources. |
The failed Obama administration
On Jan 22, 1:38*pm, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote:
wrote in message ... On Jan 22, 1:04 pm, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: You like 60 Minutes??? Aren't you people being instructed by the Garlique salesman to hate CBS? And, it appears we agree on BBC, although you pretended not to notice that when you claimed not to like my sources.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - You really need to start to read. I did not say anywhere I did not like the BBC.. ==================== No, but when I mentioned it, you dissed it. Nope, never did that and you know it... ==================== I simply noted that your stated sources limit you to one point of view. As to CBS, I don't always agree, but I watch for the same reasons I watch Chris Matthews, I am interested in all viewpoints, not just the ones I agree with. That is the difference between me and folks like you and Harry... I don't consider any part of the country "fly over", I want to be informed, even if it changes my opinion.. ==================== Most of your sources involve sitting and watching. I need to receive information at a higher rate of speed. I have an actual life from 6:00 AM until midnight most days. More excuses, you don't know what I do or where I work. Yes, I happen to be able to watch news while I am working, so what? So, where do you get your news at "a high rate of speed"? *I mean, you already dismissed 15 second news clips, or doesn't that count for you. Fact is Joe, like most far left liberals, you limit your input, guess it's easier that way, but it still leaves you terribly uninformed... ================ By the way, my day job keeps me on the phone all day long. No TV possible.. After dinner, I'm usually practicing music. No TV possible. Reading is my primary source of news, and you have no problem with that unless you invent one. Radio comes next. All I am saying is by your own admission you get your news from the BBC and NPR.. You did not note with several opportunities any other sources which is fine as long as you are satisfied with only left leaning opinion... |
The failed Obama administration
JoeSpareBedroom wrote:
wrote in message ... On Jan 22, 1:04 pm, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: You like 60 Minutes??? Aren't you people being instructed by the Garlique salesman to hate CBS? And, it appears we agree on BBC, although you pretended not to notice that when you claimed not to like my sources.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - You really need to start to read. I did not say anywhere I did not like the BBC.. ==================== No, but when I mentioned it, you dissed it. Nope, never did that and you know it... ==================== I simply noted that your stated sources limit you to one point of view. As to CBS, I don't always agree, but I watch for the same reasons I watch Chris Matthews, I am interested in all viewpoints, not just the ones I agree with. That is the difference between me and folks like you and Harry... I don't consider any part of the country "fly over", I want to be informed, even if it changes my opinion.. ==================== Most of your sources involve sitting and watching. I need to receive information at a higher rate of speed. I have an actual life from 6:00 AM until midnight most days. More excuses, you don't know what I do or where I work. Yes, I happen to be able to watch news while I am working, so what? So, where do you get your news at "a high rate of speed"? I mean, you already dismissed 15 second news clips, or doesn't that count for you. Fact is Joe, like most far left liberals, you limit your input, guess it's easier that way, but it still leaves you terribly uninformed... ================ By the way, my day job keeps me on the phone all day long. No TV possible. After dinner, I'm usually practicing music. No TV possible. Reading is my primary source of news, and you have no problem with that unless you invent one. Radio comes next. You are the ******* calling my house soliciting donations? |
The failed Obama administration
JoeSpareBedroom wrote:
wrote in message ... On Jan 22, 1:32 pm, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: wrote in message ... On Jan 22, 1:04 pm, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: You like 60 Minutes??? Aren't you people being instructed by the Garlique salesman to hate CBS? And, it appears we agree on BBC, although you pretended not to notice that when you claimed not to like my sources.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - You really need to start to read. I did not say anywhere I did not like the BBC.. ==================== No, but when I mentioned it, you dissed it. Nope, never did that and you know it... ==================== I simply noted that your stated sources limit you to one point of view. As to CBS, I don't always agree, but I watch for the same reasons I watch Chris Matthews, I am interested in all viewpoints, not just the ones I agree with. That is the difference between me and folks like you and Harry... I don't consider any part of the country "fly over", I want to be informed, even if it changes my opinion.. ==================== Most of your sources involve sitting and watching. I need to receive information at a higher rate of speed. I have an actual life from 6:00 AM until midnight most days. More excuses, you don't know what I do or where I work. Yes, I happen to be able to watch news while I am working, so what? So, where do you get your news at "a high rate of speed"? I mean, you already dismissed 15 second news clips, or doesn't that count for you. Fact is Joe, like most far left liberals, you limit your input, guess it's easier that way, but it still leaves you terribly uninformed... ================ Reading is one way of getting news at a much higher rate of speed than television, which wastes time with commercials. I'll make you a deal: Find 10 news stories which you think I haven't been exposed to. Find them via YOUR news sources, even if all you give me is a one-line description of the TV story. If I can't find 8 out of 10 via my sources and prove it to you, then you're correct. Start early Saturday. I won't have time to play until then. Pfffftttt.... ============= OK. Give me one story. Just one. If you refuse, then you've admitted that your claim was pure nonsense. If you don't go and jump out the window right now you are an ass. One news story which you think is exclusive to your magical sources. |
The failed Obama administration
HK wrote:
The Israelis have an interesting set of techniques with which they torture their suspects: they set them up in dorms, let them do their own cooking, allow contact family and conjugal visits, kill them with kindness, and get a hell of a lot more information than we do. Do you have proof of this? It's been covered in the printed and television news several times. It's not my problem if you are unaware of this. While it would be nice if that was correct, as with most statements from Harry, it isn't. Israeli Interrogation Methods Are State Terror http://www.northstarcompass.org/nsc0706/israel.htm TORTURE AND ILL-TREATMENT Israel's Interrogation of Palestinians from the Occupied Territories http://www.hrw.org/legacy/reports/1994/israel/ The Center for Human Rights and Humanitarian Law http://www.wcl.american.edu/hrbrief/v4i3/israel43.htm UN rips Israel's interrogation methods// Tactics amount to torture, panel says http://www.highbeam.com/doc/1P2-4386929.html |
The failed Obama administration
HK wrote:
The facts are simple: the Israelis treat their prisoners humanely. We do not. Israel: Palestinian prisoners suffering inhuman conditions of detention on hunger strike The International Federation for Human Rights (FIDH) expresses its grave concern at the hunger strike observed by a large number of political prisoners detained in Israel. Send Alerted by its member organizations Al Haq, the Palestinian Center for Human Rights (PCHR) and the Public Committee Against Torture in Israel (PCATI), the FIDH recalls that thousands of Palestinian political prisoners are currently on hunger strike in order to protest against their detention conditions and their treatment inside Israel Prison Service facilities. The FIDH is extremely worried as the strike, that started on 15th August in 4 Israeli prisons, is now spreading throughout other detention facilities. According the FIDH member organizations, the PCHR, Al Haq and PCATI, prisoners are routinely subjected to torture, degrading treatment and humiliation and especially to humiliating strip searches. Moreover, political prisoners are often placed in solitary confinement for extended periods of time. Since 15th August 2004, Israeli authorities have taken harsh measures from the moment some prisoners declared their intention to strike, such as transferring dozens of “prison leaders” from general sections to solitary confinement, prohibiting all visits by families and lawyers to the prisoners. The FIDH had already published a mission report in 2003 denouncing the bad conditions of detention of Palestinian prisoners in Israel and the impossibility for their families to visit them. (Palestinian Detainees in Israel: Inhuman Conditions of Detention, July 2003: http://www.fidh.org/communiq/2003/i...) . The FIDH recalls that such measures contravene namely to the UN Standard Minimum Rules for the Treatment of Prisoners, applicable in situations where individuals are deprived of their liberty. The FIDH recalls that all individuals who are deprived of their liberty shall be treated with humanity and with respect for their human dignity. Considering that the prisoners’ demands are in conformity with the international standards ensuring a human treatment to individuals deprived of their liberty, the FIDH, together with its member organizations, urges the Israeli authorities to: ensure better conditions of detention to the Palestinian political prisoners detained in Israel; respect its international obligations under the ICCPR, the ICESCR, the Convention Against Torture; abide by the international Standard Minimum Rules for the Treatment of Prisoners. |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:21 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com