|
Sponsor_an_Executive
|
Sponsor_an_Executive
|
Sponsor_an_Executive
|
Sponsor_an_Executive
On Sat, 17 Jan 2009 14:52:17 -0500, hk wrote:
Kali wrote: In article , says... http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mlS4JzDVlNA Ha! That's great. Did you catch Olberman last night? Good review of the Bush years. http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/3036677/#28699663 Eight years of bush in eight minutes...sad but funny. Infuriating. -- Regards, Curly ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Bush. Like a Rock. Only Dumber. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ |
Sponsor_an_Executive
"Curly Surmudgeon" wrote in message ... On Sat, 17 Jan 2009 14:52:17 -0500, hk wrote: Kali wrote: In article , says... http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mlS4JzDVlNA Ha! That's great. Did you catch Olberman last night? Good review of the Bush years. http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/3036677/#28699663 Eight years of bush in eight minutes...sad but funny. Infuriating. -- Regards, Curly ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Bush. Like a Rock. Only Dumber. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ The good news is that maybe with Bush gone and Obama in, Olbermann may be out of a job. Eisboch |
Sponsor_an_Executive
On Sat, 17 Jan 2009 15:33:57 -0500, "Eisboch" wrote:
"Curly Surmudgeon" wrote in message ... On Sat, 17 Jan 2009 14:52:17 -0500, hk wrote: Kali wrote: In article , says... http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mlS4JzDVlNA Ha! That's great. Did you catch Olberman last night? Good review of the Bush years. http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/3036677/#28699663 Eight years of bush in eight minutes...sad but funny. Infuriating. -- Regards, Curly ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Bush. Like a Rock. Only Dumber. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ The good news is that maybe with Bush gone and Obama in, Olbermann may be out of a job. Eisboch Noper. After about a month, Obama's going to need someone to say some good things about him. After his first 100 days, he'll be paying people to say good things about him. |
Sponsor_an_Executive
Curly Surmudgeon pinched out a steaming pile
: On Sat, 17 Jan 2009 14:52:17 -0500, hk wrote: Kali wrote: In article , says... http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mlS4JzDVlNA Ha! That's great. Did you catch Olberman last night? Good review of the Bush years. http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/3036677/#28699663 Eight years of bush in eight minutes...sad but funny. Infuriating. Support Conyers drive for holding the criminals accountable? ^_^ -- http://www.bds-palestine.net/?q=node/9 ___ ___ ___ ___ /\__\ /\ \ /\ \ /\ \ /:/ _/_ \:\ \ \:\ \ \:\ \ /:/ /\ \ \:\ \ \:\ \ \:\ \ /:/ /::\ \ _____\:\ \ ___ \:\ \ ___ /::\ \ /:/_/:/\:\__\ /::::::::\__\ /\ \ \:\__\ /\ /:/\:\__\ \:\/:/ /:/ / \:\~~\~~\/__/ \:\ \ /:/ / \:\/:/ \/__/ \::/ /:/ / \:\ \ \:\ /:/ / \::/__/ \/_/:/ / \:\ \ \:\/:/ / \:\ \ /:/ / \:\__\ \::/ / \:\__\ |
Sponsor_an_Executive
§ñühw¤£f wrote:
Curly Surmudgeon pinched out a steaming pile : On Sat, 17 Jan 2009 14:52:17 -0500, hk wrote: Kali wrote: In article , says... http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mlS4JzDVlNA Ha! That's great. Did you catch Olberman last night? Good review of the Bush years. http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/3036677/#28699663 Eight years of bush in eight minutes...sad but funny. Infuriating. Support Conyers drive for holding the criminals accountable? Don't hold you breath. On second thought please do hold you breath until it happens. |
Sponsor_an_Executive
On Sun, 18 Jan 2009 11:34:02 -0500, BAR wrote:
§ñühw¤£f wrote: Curly Surmudgeon pinched out a steaming pile : On Sat, 17 Jan 2009 14:52:17 -0500, hk wrote: Kali wrote: In article , says... http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mlS4JzDVlNA Ha! That's great. Did you catch Olberman last night? Good review of the Bush years. http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/3036677/#28699663 Eight years of bush in eight minutes...sad but funny. Infuriating. Support Conyers drive for holding the criminals accountable? Don't hold you breath. On second thought please do hold you breath until it happens. You've decided you don't like your heros anymore? Gave up on the "WMDs"? -- Cliff |
Sponsor_an_Executive
On Sun, 18 Jan 2009 10:03:56 -0600, §ñühw€£f wrote:
Curly Surmudgeon pinched out a steaming pile : On Sat, 17 Jan 2009 14:52:17 -0500, hk wrote: Kali wrote: In article , says... http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mlS4JzDVlNA Ha! That's great. Did you catch Olberman last night? Good review of the Bush years. http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/3036677/#28699663 Eight years of bush in eight minutes...sad but funny. Infuriating. Support Conyers drive for holding the criminals accountable? Been doing that. And demanding the same of every elected "representative." A letter to Eric Holder is in progress. -- Regards, Curly ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ "Thanks to Bush there has never been such a great buying opportunity" --Libby Loo ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ |
Sponsor_an_Executive
Curly Surmudgeon pinched out a steaming pile
: On Sun, 18 Jan 2009 10:03:56 -0600, §ñühw€£f wrote: Curly Surmudgeon pinched out a steaming pile : On Sat, 17 Jan 2009 14:52:17 -0500, hk wrote: Kali wrote: In article , says... http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mlS4JzDVlNA Ha! That's great. Did you catch Olberman last night? Good review of the Bush years. http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/3036677/#28699663 Eight years of bush in eight minutes...sad but funny. Infuriating. Support Conyers drive for holding the criminals accountable? Been doing that. And demanding the same of every elected "representative." A letter to Eric Holder is in progress. Looks like my dreams are gonna be answered: http://www.commondreams.org/print/36643 ^_^ -- http://www.bds-palestine.net/?q=node/9 ___ ___ ___ ___ /\__\ /\ \ /\ \ /\ \ /:/ _/_ \:\ \ \:\ \ \:\ \ /:/ /\ \ \:\ \ \:\ \ \:\ \ /:/ /::\ \ _____\:\ \ ___ \:\ \ ___ /::\ \ /:/_/:/\:\__\ /::::::::\__\ /\ \ \:\__\ /\ /:/\:\__\ \:\/:/ /:/ / \:\~~\~~\/__/ \:\ \ /:/ / \:\/:/ \/__/ \::/ /:/ / \:\ \ \:\ /:/ / \::/__/ \/_/:/ / \:\ \ \:\/:/ / \:\ \ /:/ / \:\__\ \::/ / \:\__\ |
Sponsor_an_Executive
§ñühw¤£f wrote:
Curly Surmudgeon pinched out a steaming pile : On Sun, 18 Jan 2009 10:03:56 -0600, §ñühw€£f wrote: Curly Surmudgeon pinched out a steaming pile : On Sat, 17 Jan 2009 14:52:17 -0500, hk wrote: Kali wrote: In article , says... http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mlS4JzDVlNA Ha! That's great. Did you catch Olberman last night? Good review of the Bush years. http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/3036677/#28699663 Eight years of bush in eight minutes...sad but funny. Infuriating. Support Conyers drive for holding the criminals accountable? Been doing that. And demanding the same of every elected "representative." A letter to Eric Holder is in progress. Looks like my dreams are gonna be answered: http://www.commondreams.org/print/36643 ^_^ I wouldn't mind seeing certain members of the Bush mis-administration prosecuted on criminal charges. Bush himself, no. Cheney, Gonzo...a few others, you betcha. |
Sponsor_an_Executive
On Mon, 19 Jan 2009 10:33:08 -0500, hk wrote:
§ñühw¤£f wrote: Curly Surmudgeon pinched out a steaming pile : On Sun, 18 Jan 2009 10:03:56 -0600, §ñühw€£f wrote: Curly Surmudgeon pinched out a steaming pile : On Sat, 17 Jan 2009 14:52:17 -0500, hk wrote: Kali wrote: In article , says... http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mlS4JzDVlNA Ha! That's great. Did you catch Olberman last night? Good review of the Bush years. http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/3036677/#28699663 Eight years of bush in eight minutes...sad but funny. Infuriating. Support Conyers drive for holding the criminals accountable? Been doing that. And demanding the same of every elected "representative." A letter to Eric Holder is in progress. Looks like my dreams are gonna be answered: http://www.commondreams.org/print/36643 ^_^ I wouldn't mind seeing certain members of the Bush mis-administration prosecuted on criminal charges. Bush himself, no. Cheney, Gonzo...a few others, you betcha. And your calls for prosecution of those in the Clinton administration can be found where again? Gunner |
Sponsor_an_Executive
"Kali" wrote in message ... Prosecution for what? Your boys didn't have anything to go with, so they made a circus out of a blow job and a blue dress, remember? LOL Gunner. Self-imposed ignorance through repetition. Huh, Kali? Odd how you liberals ignore the real issue which is not the blue dress and cum stain. The real issue was suborning perjury and lying under oath with the adverse effects this could have on national security via blackmail, etc. Clinton did not get disbarred because he got blow jobs in the oval office. Get a clue. Conservatives know the real issues. -- Gregory Hall |
Sponsor_an_Executive
"Kali" wrote in message ... In article , says... "Kali" wrote in message ... Prosecution for what? Your boys didn't have anything to go with, so they made a circus out of a blow job and a blue dress, remember? LOL Gunner. Self-imposed ignorance through repetition. Huh, Kali? Odd how you liberals ignore the real issue which is not the blue dress and cum stain. The real issue was suborning perjury and lying under oath Yes, that was the unfortunate part of the blow job circus brought to us by the family values hypocrites. "I did not have sex with that woman..." Horror of horrors. Perjury! A man lied about having extramarital sex! More self-imposed liberal ignorance. More attempts to re-write history. The lying under oath charge and conviction was about the suborning perjury and not about not having sex with "that woman, Monica Lewinski." That's far worse than ignoring intelligence and deceiving a country into a war costing thousands of lives and billions of dollars. A crime is a crime and a POTUS should know better. Going to war with Iraq is not a crime as it was santioned by an almost unanimous vote of Congress. A vote, BTW, Democrats insisted upon having. Liberalism = stupid, ignorant people who put hate above fact. -- Gregory Hall |
Sponsor_an_Executive
On Mon, 19 Jan 2009 16:36:12 -0500, Kali wrote:
In article , says... "Kali" wrote in message ... Prosecution for what? Your boys didn't have anything to go with, so they made a circus out of a blow job and a blue dress, remember? LOL Gunner. Self-imposed ignorance through repetition. Huh, Kali? Odd how you liberals ignore the real issue which is not the blue dress and cum stain. The real issue was suborning perjury and lying under oath Yes, that was the unfortunate part of the blow job circus brought to us by the family values hypocrites. "I did not have sex with that woman..." Horror of horrors. Perjury! A man lied about having extramarital sex! That's far worse than ignoring intelligence and deceiving a country into a war costing thousands of lives and billions of dollars. with the adverse effects this could have on national security via blackmail, etc. Clinton did not get disbarred because he got blow jobs in the oval office. Get a clue. Conservatives know the real issues. And Clinton should be prosecuted for what? Were you invited by Harry Krause to express your boating opinions? -- * I Have a Degree in Liberal Arts; Do You Want Fries With That? * John H |
Sponsor_an_Executive
On Mon, 19 Jan 2009 11:51:15 -0800, Gunner Asch
wrote: And your calls for prosecution of those in the Clinton administration can be found where again? Prosecution for what? Wingers already spent about 100 million US taxpayer dollars trying to investigate & impeach based *on their own lies*. All you got was poor little Monica which was none of your business anyway as well as being entrapment & illegal phone tapeing, etc. Did you spend one thin dime on neocons? Nope. And THEY have confessed/bragged in public. -- Cliff |
Sponsor_an_Executive
On Mon, 19 Jan 2009 10:48:59 -0500, hk wrote:
It's going to be a very rough eight years for Gummy. He may even get "free" psychiatric care. -- Cliff |
Sponsor_an_Executive
On Mon, 19 Jan 2009 15:57:58 -0500, "Gregory Hall" wrote:
"Kali" wrote in message .. . Prosecution for what? Your boys didn't have anything to go with, so they made a circus out of a blow job and a blue dress, remember? LOL Gunner. Self-imposed ignorance through repetition. Huh, Kali? Odd how you liberals ignore the real issue which is not the blue dress and cum stain. The real issue was suborning perjury and lying under oath with the adverse effects this could have on national security via blackmail, etc. Clinton did not get disbarred because he got blow jobs in the oval office. Get a clue. Conservatives know the real issues. They lie a lot. "blow job and a blue dress". 100 milion spent investigating. WHAT "suborning perjury and lying under oath"? Found those "WMDs" yet? BTW, The NIE presented to congress by the neocons was *blatently edited* by them. The *original* said "Saddam & Iraq are no threat to the US or anybody". -- Cliff |
Sponsor_an_Executive
On Mon, 19 Jan 2009 16:36:12 -0500, Kali wrote:
"I did not have sex with that woman..." Horror of horrors. Perjury! A man lied about having extramarital sex! Nope. "Sex" has a legal meaning & this was a legal issue. I checked long ago. -- Cliff |
Sponsor_an_Executive
On Mon, 19 Jan 2009 16:45:48 -0500, "Gregory Hall" wrote:
"I did not have sex with that woman..." Horror of horrors. Perjury! A man lied about having extramarital sex! More self-imposed liberal ignorance. More attempts to re-write history. The lying under oath charge and conviction was about the suborning perjury and not about not having sex with "that woman, Monica Lewinski." "Susan McDougal's brother has accused Ken Starr of suborning perjury" but Clinton was not convicted of any such by the Senate. More winger ignorance. -- Cliff |
Sponsor_an_Executive
On Mon, 19 Jan 2009 16:45:48 -0500, "Gregory Hall" wrote:
Liberalism = stupid, ignorant people who put hate above fact. Wingers buy & tell lies. -- Cliff |
Sponsor_an_Executive
On Mon, 19 Jan 2009 17:04:21 -0500, Kali wrote:
A crime is a crime and a POTUS should know better. Going to war with Iraq is not a crime as it was santioned by an almost unanimous vote of Congress. A vote, BTW, Democrats insisted upon having. Congress did not vote to go to war, they voted to give Bush the authority to use force, and only if necessary. We'll see what the investigation reveals. http://www.informationclearinghouse....ticle19903.htm [ A Monumental Lie In his first nationally televised address on the Iraqi crisis on October 7, 2002, six days after receiving the National Intelligence Estimate (NIE), a classified CIA report, President Bush told millions of Americans the exact opposite of what the CIA was telling him -a monumental lie to the nation and the world. On the evening of October 7, 2002, the very latest CIA intelligence was that Hussein was not an imminent threat to the U.S. This same information was delivered to the Bush administration as early as October 1, 2002, in the NIE, including input from the CIA and 15 other U.S. intelligence agencies. In addition, CIA director George Tenet briefed Bush in the Oval Office on the morning of October 7th. According to the October 1, 2002 NIE, “Baghdad for now appears to be drawing a line short of conducting terrorist attacks with conventional or CBW [chemical and biological warfare] against the United States, fearing that exposure of Iraqi involvement would provide Washington a stronger case for making war.” The report concluded that Hussein was not planning to use any weapons of mass destruction; further, Hussein would only use weapons of mass destruction he was believed to have if he were first attacked, that is, he would only use them in self-defense. Preparing its declassified version of the NIE for Congress, which became known as the White Paper, the Bush administration edited the classified NIE document in ways that significantly changed its inference and meaning, making the threat seem imminent and ominous. In the original NIE report, members of the U.S. intelligence community vigorously disagreed with the CIA’s bloated and inaccurate conclusions. All such opposing commentary was eliminated from the declassified White Paper prepared for Congress and the American people. ] HTH -- Cliff |
Sponsor_an_Executive
hk wrote:
§ñühw¤£f wrote: Curly Surmudgeon pinched out a steaming pile : On Sun, 18 Jan 2009 10:03:56 -0600, §ñühw€£f wrote: Curly Surmudgeon pinched out a steaming pile : On Sat, 17 Jan 2009 14:52:17 -0500, hk wrote: Kali wrote: In article , says... http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mlS4JzDVlNA Ha! That's great. Did you catch Olberman last night? Good review of the Bush years. http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/3036677/#28699663 Eight years of bush in eight minutes...sad but funny. Infuriating. Support Conyers drive for holding the criminals accountable? Been doing that. And demanding the same of every elected "representative." A letter to Eric Holder is in progress. Looks like my dreams are gonna be answered: http://www.commondreams.org/print/36643 ^_^ I wouldn't mind seeing certain members of the Bush mis-administration prosecuted on criminal charges. Bush himself, no. Cheney, Gonzo...a few others, you betcha. I have a BA from Yale just like Harry Krause (hk) does. |
Sponsor_an_Executive
hk wrote:
Kali wrote: In article , says... On Mon, 19 Jan 2009 10:33:08 -0500, hk wrote: §ñühw¤£f wrote: Curly Surmudgeon pinched out a steaming pile : On Sun, 18 Jan 2009 10:03:56 -0600, §ñühw€£f wrote: Curly Surmudgeon pinched out a steaming pile : On Sat, 17 Jan 2009 14:52:17 -0500, hk wrote: Kali wrote: In article , says... http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mlS4JzDVlNA Ha! That's great. Did you catch Olberman last night? Good review of the Bush years. http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/3036677/#28699663 Eight years of bush in eight minutes...sad but funny. Infuriating. Support Conyers drive for holding the criminals accountable? Been doing that. And demanding the same of every elected "representative." A letter to Eric Holder is in progress. Looks like my dreams are gonna be answered: http://www.commondreams.org/print/36643 ^_^ I wouldn't mind seeing certain members of the Bush mis-administration prosecuted on criminal charges. Bush himself, no. Cheney, Gonzo...a few others, you betcha. And your calls for prosecution of those in the Clinton administration can be found where again? Gunner Prosecution for what? Your boys didn't have anything to go with, so they made a circus out of a blow job and a blue dress, remember? LOL Gunner. It's going to be a very rough eight years for Gummy. I have a BA from Yale just like Harry Krause (hk) does. |
Sponsor_an_Executive
On Mon, 19 Jan 2009 19:34:59 -0500, BAR wrote:
I have a BA from Yale In cheerleading & Spanish like herr shrubbie? Did you have lots of tutors & test copies too? -- Cliff |
Sponsor_an_Executive
Cliff wrote:
On Mon, 19 Jan 2009 19:34:59 -0500, BAR wrote: I have a BA from Yale In cheerleading & Spanish like herr shrubbie? Did you have lots of tutors & test copies too? Bert Robbins (BAR) was too dimwitted to get into college, so he signed up for the marines and couldn't even get posted overseas. |
Sponsor_an_Executive
On Mon, 19 Jan 2009 18:20:13 -0800, Gunner Asch
wrote: Odd...the lying under oath, the disbarment, the missile secrets for campaign contributions, the serial rapes, the drug dealing....I dont recall much being made out of those, do you? Your winger lies. Bad memory? Altzheimers? -- Cliff |
Sponsor_an_Executive
On Mon, 19 Jan 2009 18:20:13 -0800, Gunner Asch
wrote: Snicker...its going to be a very rough 8 yrs for all you Liberals when you discover that it will be business as usual, with higher taxes. Sort of like under Clinton, paying down the debt & the best economy the US has ever had? Like that? -- Cliff |
Sponsor_an_Executive
On Sat, 17 Jan 2009 14:52:17 -0500, hk wrote:
Kali wrote: In article , says... http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mlS4JzDVlNA Ha! That's great. Did you catch Olberman last night? Good review of the Bush years. http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/3036677/#28699663 Eight years of bush in eight minutes...sad but funny. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lgq5suMXCV8 http://3trillion.org/ |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:17 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com