BoatBanter.com

BoatBanter.com (https://www.boatbanter.com/)
-   General (https://www.boatbanter.com/general/)
-   -   The 'anonymous' caller (https://www.boatbanter.com/general/101349-anonymous-caller.html)

Tim January 8th 09 09:10 PM

The 'anonymous' caller
 
On Jan 8, 2:00*pm, hk wrote:
wrote:
On Thu, 08 Jan 2009 14:35:56 -0500, John H
wrote:


On Thu, 08 Jan 2009 13:41:34 -0500, Wayne.B
wrote:


On Wed, 07 Jan 2009 09:31:27 -0500, John H
wrote:


It might be interesting to call the number and ask for the prime
suspect by name.
Well, unless he's *really* stupid, your post may have tipped him off to
that trick!
I think you've already got enough evidence if you want to press
charges.
No, I don't want to get the guy's family involved.


That's pretty stupid. On the one hand, you claim your wife was
verbally and obscenely harrased, and on the other hand, you are
worried about hurting the feelings of the cretins wife? If he actually
did what he proposed, would you use that excuse for being an enabler
as well?


Face it. You are too much of a pansy wimp to stand up for your wife or
yourself.


I won't comment on the alleged incident(s), but I will offer this:

I briefly met Herring and his wife about five years ago at a marina.
Mrs. Herring was friendly, gracious and pleasant. Herring himself was
the same obnoxious, snarky, trouble-making asshole he is here. It's no
wonder Herring is always going off to play golf; his wife probably can't
stand to be with him in the house all day long every day. *:)- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -


Harry, that's odd. I don't knwo what may have happened between the two
(or in this case..three) of you, but I've talked via phone may times
with John and also his wife and have had nothing but pleasant
conversations.

Tim January 8th 09 09:16 PM

The 'anonymous' caller
 
On Jan 8, 3:06*pm, "Don White" wrote:

I'm hearing all kinds of speculating...throwing names around etc.
Where I come from an individual is innocent until proven guilty.



- Show quoted text -



Don, I agree with you 100%!

But then again, until proven innocent there's always speculation of
guilt first.

hk January 8th 09 09:18 PM

The 'anonymous' caller
 
Tim wrote:
On Jan 8, 2:00 pm, hk wrote:
wrote:
On Thu, 08 Jan 2009 14:35:56 -0500, John H
wrote:
On Thu, 08 Jan 2009 13:41:34 -0500, Wayne.B
wrote:
On Wed, 07 Jan 2009 09:31:27 -0500, John H
wrote:
It might be interesting to call the number and ask for the prime
suspect by name.
Well, unless he's *really* stupid, your post may have tipped him off to
that trick!
I think you've already got enough evidence if you want to press
charges.
No, I don't want to get the guy's family involved.
That's pretty stupid. On the one hand, you claim your wife was
verbally and obscenely harrased, and on the other hand, you are
worried about hurting the feelings of the cretins wife? If he actually
did what he proposed, would you use that excuse for being an enabler
as well?
Face it. You are too much of a pansy wimp to stand up for your wife or
yourself.

I won't comment on the alleged incident(s), but I will offer this:

I briefly met Herring and his wife about five years ago at a marina.
Mrs. Herring was friendly, gracious and pleasant. Herring himself was
the same obnoxious, snarky, trouble-making asshole he is here. It's no
wonder Herring is always going off to play golf; his wife probably can't
stand to be with him in the house all day long every day. :)- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -


Harry, that's odd. I don't knwo what may have happened between the two
(or in this case..three) of you, but I've talked via phone may times
with John and also his wife and have had nothing but pleasant
conversations.



Herring's wife was perfectly well-mannered. Herring behaved like an
asshole. Just as he behaves here. *I* on the other hand was friendly
during our meeting and even invited him to climb aboard my boat for a
look-see. And I complimented him on how well he kept his boat.



hk January 8th 09 09:23 PM

The 'anonymous' caller
 
Tim wrote:
On Jan 8, 3:06 pm, "Don White" wrote:

I'm hearing all kinds of speculating...throwing names around etc.
Where I come from an individual is innocent until proven guilty.


- Show quoted text -



Don, I agree with you 100%!

But then again, until proven innocent there's always speculation of
guilt first.



The problem is, there's a clique of assholes here with nothing to do
except cackle like hens in a barnyard.

[email protected] January 8th 09 09:47 PM

The 'anonymous' caller
 
On Jan 8, 2:35*pm, John H wrote:
On Thu, 08 Jan 2009 13:41:34 -0500, Wayne.B

wrote:
On Wed, 07 Jan 2009 09:31:27 -0500, John H
wrote:


It might be interesting to call the number and ask for the prime
suspect by name.


Well, unless he's *really* stupid, your post may have tipped him off to
that trick!


I think you've already got enough evidence if you want to press
charges.


No, I don't want to get the guy's family involved.

Harry sure seems upset about the idea, though. The guy must be one of his
favorite minions. And lives in the Cleveland area. And has a mental
problem. I wonder if his initials are JH.


The phone was registered in Ohio, does not mean that's where the call
came from.. Trust me on this one...

John H[_8_] January 8th 09 10:19 PM

The 'anonymous' caller
 
On Thu, 8 Jan 2009 17:06:34 -0400, "Don White"
wrote:


"John H" wrote in message
.. .
On Thu, 8 Jan 2009 15:40:21 -0400, "Don White"
wrote:


"hk" wrote in message
...
Wayne.B wrote:
On Wed, 07 Jan 2009 09:31:27 -0500, John H
wrote:

It might be interesting to call the number and ask for the prime
suspect by name.
Well, unless he's *really* stupid, your post may have tipped him off
to
that trick!

I think you've already got enough evidence if you want to press
charges.



Keep on beating that dead horse, w'hine.

Those southern boys won't be happy until they get some good 'ole southern
justice...at the end of a lash , rope or maybe both.


Worries you too, huh Don? Must be a close buddy. And there aren't that
many
around.


I'm hearing all kinds of speculating...throwing names around etc.
Where I come from an individual is innocent until proven guilty.
Maybe your southern buddies can set up a kangroo court ....at least oneof
them must have a judge as kin .

How many names have been thrown around, Don. Where are you hearing all this
stuff. You should just call Harry. He knows, you know.

Jim January 8th 09 11:01 PM

The 'anonymous' caller
 
Tim wrote:
On Jan 8, 3:06 pm, "Don White" wrote:

I'm hearing all kinds of speculating...throwing names around etc.
Where I come from an individual is innocent until proven guilty.


- Show quoted text -



Don, I agree with you 100%!

But then again, until proven innocent there's always speculation of
guilt first.


Let's just call the guy a person of interest for now.

Jim January 8th 09 11:08 PM

The 'anonymous' caller
 
wrote:
On Thu, 08 Jan 2009 14:35:56 -0500, John H
wrote:

On Thu, 08 Jan 2009 13:41:34 -0500, Wayne.B
wrote:

On Wed, 07 Jan 2009 09:31:27 -0500, John H
wrote:

It might be interesting to call the number and ask for the prime
suspect by name.
Well, unless he's *really* stupid, your post may have tipped him off to
that trick!
I think you've already got enough evidence if you want to press
charges.

No, I don't want to get the guy's family involved.


That's pretty stupid. On the one hand, you claim your wife was
verbally and obscenely harrased, and on the other hand, you are
worried about hurting the feelings of the cretins wife? If he actually
did what he proposed, would you use that excuse for being an enabler
as well?

Face it. You are too much of a pansy wimp to stand up for your wife or
yourself.

How can he stand up for his wife when you are harbouring the cretin and
won't help John get justice.

[email protected] January 8th 09 11:18 PM

The 'anonymous' caller
 
On Jan 8, 6:08*pm, Jim wrote:
wrote:
On Thu, 08 Jan 2009 14:35:56 -0500, John H
wrote:


On Thu, 08 Jan 2009 13:41:34 -0500, Wayne.B
wrote:


On Wed, 07 Jan 2009 09:31:27 -0500, John H
wrote:


It might be interesting to call the number and ask for the prime
suspect by name.
Well, unless he's *really* stupid, your post may have tipped him off to
that trick!
I think you've already got enough evidence if you want to press
charges.
No, I don't want to get the guy's family involved.


That's pretty stupid. On the one hand, you claim your wife was
verbally and obscenely harrased, and on the other hand, you are
worried about hurting the feelings of the cretins wife? If he actually
did what he proposed, would you use that excuse for being an enabler
as well?


Face it. You are too much of a pansy wimp to stand up for your wife or
yourself.


How can he stand up for his wife when you are harbouring the cretin and
won't help John get justice.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -


Be careful now. Salty works for the BFI and gets his info before the
news;). I loved it when he reported "the kids would be picked up at
the regular time" as my kid walked in the door three hours early.
snerk. Of course maybe his under cover disguise is the designated
barrel dweller, code name "saltybreath". Pfffftttt...

BAR[_3_] January 8th 09 11:40 PM

The 'anonymous' caller
 
Don White wrote:
"hk" wrote in message
...
Wayne.B wrote:
On Wed, 07 Jan 2009 09:31:27 -0500, John H
wrote:

It might be interesting to call the number and ask for the prime
suspect by name.
Well, unless he's *really* stupid, your post may have tipped him off to
that trick!
I think you've already got enough evidence if you want to press
charges.


Keep on beating that dead horse, w'hine.


Those southern boys won't be happy until they get some good 'ole southern
justice...at the end of a lash , rope or maybe both.


The most racist people I have ever met have come from North of the
Mason-Dixon line. I count you as one of them Don.




All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:58 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com