Hey John...
 

On Jan 6, 12:34*pm, John H wrote:
On Tue, 06 Jan 2009 02:59:03 -0500, Wayne.B

wrote:
On Mon, 5 Jan 2009 21:31:46 -0800 (PST),
wrote:

Check your E-mail... and have at it;)

Scotty...

Did you find the perp, and did he turn out to be the most likely
suspect ?

It's being worked on. I don't have any close cop friends anymore, or it
would have been done.

We are just waiting for a confirmation, but I think we got it...
Interesting indeed...

Hey John...
 

"hk" wrote in message
m...

I know who made the call from the number in question. Took 20 seconds. No
$$$.


I wouldn't spend 20 seconds trying to find out.

Eisboch

Hey John...
 

Eisboch wrote:

"hk" wrote in message
m...

I know who made the call from the number in question. Took 20 seconds.
No $$$.


I wouldn't spend 20 seconds trying to find out.

Eisboch

Yeah, but you have horses and snow. I just have another 64 pages of
blueline to proofread.

Hey John...
 

On Tue, 6 Jan 2009 10:33:57 -0800 (PST), wrote:

On Jan 6, 1:30*pm, wrote:
On Tue, 6 Jan 2009 10:14:31 -0800 (PST), wrote:
On Jan 6, 1:09*pm, wrote:
On Tue, 6 Jan 2009 09:41:45 -0800 (PST), wrote:
On Jan 6, 12:34*pm, John H wrote:
On Tue, 06 Jan 2009 02:59:03 -0500, Wayne.B

wrote:
On Mon, 5 Jan 2009 21:31:46 -0800 (PST),
wrote:

Check your E-mail... and have at it;)

Scotty...

Did you find the perp, and did he turn out to be the most likely
suspect ?

It's being worked on. I don't have any close cop friends anymore, or it
would have been done.

We are just waiting for a confirmation, but I think we got it...
Interesting indeed...

Too funny. You nitwits have been handed the phone number of who you
are looking for, and two days later you don't know who they are. When
you wake up in the morning, how long does it take you to find your
dick?- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Not long at all, I just look in your mouth... * We have not given this
a priority, the number ain't going anywhere, neither is the caller...
We have lives beyond trolling the internet, do you?

With a phone numbetr in hand, you can know who made it in less than a
minute. You are incompetent.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

and you are a coward.. now back under your desk...

I wonder why those who are 'in the know' don't just post the information?
It's for damn sure someone who is pretty sick. It sure as hell wouldn't
hurt for everyone to know who it is.

I won't call the cops because I don't want to cause problems for the guy's
family, assuming he has one. I know how my wife felt, just listening to the
crap he left on the recorder and the phone ringing seventeen times.

Hey John...
 

On Jan 6, 2:40*pm, John H wrote:
On Tue, 6 Jan 2009 10:33:57 -0800 (PST), wrote:
On Jan 6, 1:30*pm, wrote:
On Tue, 6 Jan 2009 10:14:31 -0800 (PST), wrote:
On Jan 6, 1:09*pm, wrote:
On Tue, 6 Jan 2009 09:41:45 -0800 (PST), wrote:
On Jan 6, 12:34*pm, John H wrote:
On Tue, 06 Jan 2009 02:59:03 -0500, Wayne.B

wrote:
On Mon, 5 Jan 2009 21:31:46 -0800 (PST),
wrote:

Check your E-mail... and have at it;)

Scotty...

Did you find the perp, and did he turn out to be the most likely
suspect ?

It's being worked on. I don't have any close cop friends anymore, or it
would have been done.

We are just waiting for a confirmation, but I think we got it...
Interesting indeed...

Too funny. You nitwits have been handed the phone number of who you
are looking for, and two days later you don't know who they are. When
you wake up in the morning, how long does it take you to find your
dick?- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Not long at all, I just look in your mouth... * We have not given this
a priority, the number ain't going anywhere, neither is the caller...
We have lives beyond trolling the internet, do you?

With a phone numbetr in hand, you can know who made it in less than a
minute. You are incompetent.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

and you are a coward.. now back under your desk...

I wonder why those who are 'in the know' don't just post the information?
It's for damn sure someone who is pretty sick. It sure as hell wouldn't
hurt for everyone to know who it is.

I won't call the cops because I don't want to cause problems for the guy's
family, assuming he has one. I know how my wife felt, just listening to the
crap he left on the recorder and the phone ringing seventeen times.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Remember, it was salty and harry that said they knew already... you
know where I a going with this;) Harry went to Yale, and salty works
with the bfi... snerk

Hey John...
 

On Tue, 6 Jan 2009 13:46:53 -0500, "Eisboch" wrote:


"hk" wrote in message
om...

I know who made the call from the number in question. Took 20 seconds. No
$$$.


I wouldn't spend 20 seconds trying to find out.

Eisboch

Yabut, it wasn't your house!

Hey John...
 

Hey John...
 

On Jan 6, 1:53*pm, hk wrote:
Eisboch wrote:

"hk" wrote in message
om...

I know who made the call from the number in question. Took 20 seconds.
No $$$.

I wouldn't spend 20 seconds trying to find out.

Eisboch

Yeah, but you have horses and snow. I just have another 64 pages of
blueline to proofread.

"Blueline to proofread".....BWAAAAHAAAAA!!!!!!!

Hey John...
 

wrote in message
...
On Tue, 6 Jan 2009 13:46:53 -0500, "Eisboch"
wrote:


"hk" wrote in message
news:v7mdnXPjisFsOP7UnZ2dnUVZ_szinZ2d@earthlink. com...

I know who made the call from the number in question. Took 20 seconds.
No
$$$.


I wouldn't spend 20 seconds trying to find out.

Eisboch

It probably took you 20 seconds to post this response. Did you first
spend a day or two deciding whether it was worth spending the 20
seconds?


YAWN

Eisboch

Hey John...
 

"John H" wrote in message
...
On Tue, 6 Jan 2009 13:46:53 -0500, "Eisboch" wrote:


"hk" wrote in message
news:v7mdnXPjisFsOP7UnZ2dnUVZ_szinZ2d@earthlink. com...

I know who made the call from the number in question. Took 20 seconds.
No
$$$.


I wouldn't spend 20 seconds trying to find out.

Eisboch

Yabut, it wasn't your house!

I don't post people's personal information in a newsgroup either.

Eisboch