Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hi all,
My first post to this news group. I am looking at purchasing a new boat. I need one that is usable for fishing and usable for touring the lake, with 4-6 people. I have narrowed the search to the following two boats: 1. Lund: Prosport 1700 2. PrinceCraft superpro 176 Both boats are 2003 models, and both with a 4 stroke Merc 115HP. Any good point, bad points with the above boats? Which one is better? Any body out there with experience with both? Thanks, Ken |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
For what it's worth ... caught the tail end of a TV show discussing a Merc
(100 hp?) that automatically reduces to 2 cyl operation below a certain rpm (1200 ?) ... dunno if that may be worth your while looking into for fishing, idling around the lake. "KRead" wrote in message news ![]() Hi all, My first post to this news group. I am looking at purchasing a new boat. I need one that is usable for fishing and usable for touring the lake, with 4-6 people. I have narrowed the search to the following two boats: 1. Lund: Prosport 1700 2. PrinceCraft superpro 176 Both boats are 2003 models, and both with a 4 stroke Merc 115HP. Any good point, bad points with the above boats? Which one is better? Any body out there with experience with both? Thanks, Ken |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "bowgus" wrote in message le.rogers.com... For what it's worth ... caught the tail end of a TV show discussing a Merc (100 hp?) that automatically reduces to 2 cyl operation below a certain rpm (1200 ?) ... dunno if that may be worth your while looking into for fishing, idling around the lake. "KRead" wrote in message news ![]() Hi all, My first post to this news group. I am looking at purchasing a new boat. I need one that is usable for fishing and usable for touring the lake, with 4-6 people. I have narrowed the search to the following two boats: 1. Lund: Prosport 1700 2. PrinceCraft superpro 176 Both boats are 2003 models, and both with a 4 stroke Merc 115HP. Any good point, bad points with the above boats? Which one is better? Any body out there with experience with both? Thanks, Ken Lund boats are highly thought of in Minnesota and maintain their value well. Princecraft are Canadian and have a much smaller market share here in this part of the country. The 115 Merc/Yamaha 4 stroke is said to be a very nice motor. The ones I've observed certainly have been. My guess is that the boats would both be satisfactory, and perhaps the choice should be determined by your location and the line carried by your preferred dealer. del cecchi |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
I have no experience with the specific Lund you mentioned, but I've owned a
WC-14 for 4 years. All it's got is bench seats and the lights *I* installed, so I can't speak to the issue of how all your attached accessories would hold up. But: 1) I've asked the dealer numerous times to let me know if a bigger, USED Lund comes along. His response is always something like "Yeah...right. You've gotta inherit them from someone. Nobody seems to get rid of them". 2) I take my boat through choppy water it really doesn't belong in and beat the crap out of it. The only seepage I've ever had is when I haven't noticed that the drain plug is getting worn out. The rest of the boat's still nice & tight, and the hull paint has held up beautifully. Unless I needed a boat style that Lund didn't make, I wouldn't buy anything else next time around. -Doug "KRead" wrote in message news ![]() Hi all, My first post to this news group. I am looking at purchasing a new boat. I need one that is usable for fishing and usable for touring the lake, with 4-6 people. I have narrowed the search to the following two boats: 1. Lund: Prosport 1700 2. PrinceCraft superpro 176 Both boats are 2003 models, and both with a 4 stroke Merc 115HP. Any good point, bad points with the above boats? Which one is better? Any body out there with experience with both? Thanks, Ken |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
I have owned a 1991 Princecraft Super Pro 196 for 7 years. During that time
we have had to replace the deck and a few rivets have popped below the waterline. It has been used in salt water and run hard. Handles rough water ok. When contacting Princecraft with questions a few years ago received little to no help so I don't bother now. FYI Steve "del cecchi" wrote in message ... "bowgus" wrote in message le.rogers.com... For what it's worth ... caught the tail end of a TV show discussing a Merc (100 hp?) that automatically reduces to 2 cyl operation below a certain rpm (1200 ?) ... dunno if that may be worth your while looking into for fishing, idling around the lake. "KRead" wrote in message news ![]() Hi all, My first post to this news group. I am looking at purchasing a new boat. I need one that is usable for fishing and usable for touring the lake, with 4-6 people. I have narrowed the search to the following two boats: 1. Lund: Prosport 1700 2. PrinceCraft superpro 176 Both boats are 2003 models, and both with a 4 stroke Merc 115HP. Any good point, bad points with the above boats? Which one is better? Any body out there with experience with both? Thanks, Ken Lund boats are highly thought of in Minnesota and maintain their value well. Princecraft are Canadian and have a much smaller market share here in this part of the country. The 115 Merc/Yamaha 4 stroke is said to be a very nice motor. The ones I've observed certainly have been. My guess is that the boats would both be satisfactory, and perhaps the choice should be determined by your location and the line carried by your preferred dealer. del cecchi |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
KRead wrote:
Hi all, My first post to this news group. I am looking at purchasing a new boat. I need one that is usable for fishing and usable for touring the lake, with 4-6 people. I have narrowed the search to the following two boats: 1. Lund: Prosport 1700 2. PrinceCraft superpro 176 Both boats are 2003 models, and both with a 4 stroke Merc 115HP. Any good point, bad points with the above boats? Which one is better? Any body out there with experience with both? Thanks, Ken Lund no question |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
I've had a 14.5 ft, high transom Lund for a long time also. Been in lots of
salt water, banged on rocks and driven too hard on the chop. It's not pretty anymore, but it's watertight and handles bad weather well. If they made weekend cruisers, my next boat would be a Lund too. Surfnturf "Doug Kanter" wrote in message ... I have no experience with the specific Lund you mentioned, but I've owned a WC-14 for 4 years. All it's got is bench seats and the lights *I* installed, so I can't speak to the issue of how all your attached accessories would hold up. But: 1) I've asked the dealer numerous times to let me know if a bigger, USED Lund comes along. His response is always something like "Yeah...right. You've gotta inherit them from someone. Nobody seems to get rid of them". 2) I take my boat through choppy water it really doesn't belong in and beat the crap out of it. The only seepage I've ever had is when I haven't noticed that the drain plug is getting worn out. The rest of the boat's still nice & tight, and the hull paint has held up beautifully. Unless I needed a boat style that Lund didn't make, I wouldn't buy anything else next time around. -Doug "KRead" wrote in message news ![]() Hi all, My first post to this news group. I am looking at purchasing a new boat. I need one that is usable for fishing and usable for touring the lake, with 4-6 people. I have narrowed the search to the following two boats: 1. Lund: Prosport 1700 2. PrinceCraft superpro 176 Both boats are 2003 models, and both with a 4 stroke Merc 115HP. Any good point, bad points with the above boats? Which one is better? Any body out there with experience with both? Thanks, Ken |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
As it's been mentioned before, the Lunds retain their value very well. They
also handle bigger water and severe pounding so well, people probably take them on water they should't. I know I now use my little Lund Rebel on Long Island Sound and have used it extensively on Lake Erie and Michigan. Lund themselves are very easy to contact and speak with just about anyone you want to. I don't know much about Princecraft, never seen one, never been on one. Hard for me to compare. |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "miami vice" wrote in message om... (AKPBrown) wrote in message ... As it's been mentioned before, the Lunds retain their value very well. They also handle bigger water and severe pounding so well, people probably take them on water they should't. I know I now use my little Lund Rebel on Long Island Sound and have used it extensively on Lake Erie and Michigan. Lund themselves are very easy to contact and speak with just about anyone you want to. I don't know much about Princecraft, never seen one, never been on one. Hard for me to compare. Lund & Princecraft are of equal quality. Lund is more popular in Minnesota and Princecraft is more popular in Canada. I would go with the dealer you feel more comfortable with. Yes Princecraft & Lund are on the higher end of both quality & price, but that doesn't mean that some of the other brands are bad. Lots of people have brands like Alumacraft and Crestliner, and are very happy with them too. People who buy Alumacraft or Crestliner probably save a little money over buying a Lund or a Princecraft, and in their mind they feel that their boat is just as good as Lund or a Princecraft. Miami Vice Here in Minnesota, where Lund, Crestliner, Alumacraft are all made (except for the alumacraft jon boats) they are considered close to equal. When I was shopping a few years ago, the Alumacraft equivilent of my boat was a few hundred dollars cheaper out of a total package price of close to 18k. del cecchi |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|