| Page 1 of 2 | 1 | 2 |
|
|
31-10?
BBBAAAWWWAAAHHHHHAAAAAAA!!!!!!!
31-10. BBBAAAWWWAAAHHHHAAAAAA!!!!!! |
31-10?
"Tom Francis" wrote in message ... BBBAAAWWWAAAHHHHHAAAAAAA!!!!!!! 31-10. BBBAAAWWWAAAHHHHAAAAAA!!!!!! Cool ! Eisboch |
31-10?
On Jan 1, 5:07*pm, "Eisboch" wrote:
"Tom Francis" wrote in message ... BBBAAAWWWAAAHHHHHAAAAAAA!!!!!!! 31-10. BBBAAAWWWAAAHHHHAAAAAA!!!!!! Cool ! Eisboch That's not funny or cool. Um, really, it's not. :-( |
31-10?
wrote in message ... On Jan 1, 5:07 pm, "Eisboch" wrote: "Tom Francis" wrote in message ... BBBAAAWWWAAAHHHHHAAAAAAA!!!!!!! 31-10. BBBAAAWWWAAAHHHHAAAAAA!!!!!! Cool ! Eisboch That's not funny or cool. Um, really, it's not. :-( ------------------------------ Maybe I misunderstood? Eisboch |
31-10?
On Jan 1, 11:25*pm, "Eisboch" wrote:
wrote in message ... On Jan 1, 5:07 pm, "Eisboch" wrote: "Tom Francis" wrote in message .. . BBBAAAWWWAAAHHHHHAAAAAAA!!!!!!! 31-10. BBBAAAWWWAAAHHHHAAAAAA!!!!!! Cool ! Eisboch That's not funny or cool. * Um, really, it's not. *:-( ------------------------------ Maybe I misunderstood? Eisboch Sorry... didn't mean to sound so serious. It's just Tom poking fun at me over USC's loss to Iowa yesterday. That's the second time this year they've spotted the opposing team 21 points in the first quarter with turnovers. They're trying hard to prove that you can win without having a decent QB. So far, they're proved nothing. :-) |
31-10?
On Jan 2, 8:27*am, John H wrote:
On Fri, 2 Jan 2009 05:14:32 -0800 (PST), wrote: On Jan 1, 11:25*pm, "Eisboch" wrote: wrote in message .... On Jan 1, 5:07 pm, "Eisboch" wrote: "Tom Francis" wrote in message .. . BBBAAAWWWAAAHHHHHAAAAAAA!!!!!!! 31-10. BBBAAAWWWAAAHHHHAAAAAA!!!!!! Cool ! Eisboch That's not funny or cool. * Um, really, it's not. *:-( ------------------------------ Maybe I misunderstood? Eisboch Sorry... didn't mean to sound so serious. *It's just Tom poking fun at me over USC's loss to Iowa yesterday. That's the second time this year they've spotted the opposing team 21 points in the first quarter with turnovers. *They're trying hard to prove that you can win without having a decent QB. *So far, they're proved nothing. *:-) Jack, are you a USC guy also? The real USC... University of South Carolina. Not that other one. :- |
31-10?
|
31-10?
|
31-10?
|
31-10?
On Jan 2, 9:14*am, Boater wrote:
wrote: On Jan 1, 11:25 pm, "Eisboch" wrote: wrote in message .... On Jan 1, 5:07 pm, "Eisboch" wrote: "Tom Francis" wrote in message ... BBBAAAWWWAAAHHHHHAAAAAAA!!!!!!! 31-10. BBBAAAWWWAAAHHHHAAAAAA!!!!!! Cool ! Eisboch That's not funny or cool. * Um, really, it's not. *:-( ------------------------------ Maybe I misunderstood? Eisboch Sorry... didn't mean to sound so serious. *It's just Tom poking fun at me over USC's loss to Iowa yesterday. That's the second time this year they've spotted the opposing team 21 points in the first quarter with turnovers. *They're trying hard to prove that you can win without having a decent QB. *So far, they're proved nothing. *:-) Why would anyone give a **** over a college football score?- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Because some people like to watch college football. Because some people went to college and are loyal to their teams Because some people aren't assholes who sit at their computer all day. Because some people enjoy life in a different way than some other asshole. |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:26 AM. |
|
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com