|
Will some heads at the NYT roll?
On Tue, 23 Dec 2008 13:18:11 -0800 (PST), Tim wrote:
On Dec 23, 6:56*am, Salmonbait wrote: And yes, some heads should roll at the NYT. But, they should have rolled a few years back. -- John Have a Super Christmas and a Spectacular New Year! yes, I feel they should, but do you think they will? No. The NYT is a liberal rag. Liberals, from my experience, could care less about the truth. Remember, morals are a religious, not a legal, concept. Therefore integrity is not a trait valued by liberals or secular progressives. Actually, you could figure that out right here in the NG. ;) -- We say, "MERRY CHRISTMAS!" John |
Will some heads at the NYT roll?
Salmonbait wrote:
On Tue, 23 Dec 2008 15:22:08 -0500, Boater wrote: wrote: On Dec 22, 11:21 pm, wrote: On Dec 22, 10:43 pm, Tim wrote: They should http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/7796700.stm But the same media attacked Palin for momentarily believing that someone calling into a radio talk show was the French President. She was on the spot, while the NYT had days to check on it and think about it before publishing. The liberal sheeple fell into lockstep behind the image. Amazing. I couldn't believe it the other day. A couple of nurses were talking about Michelle Obama who was being interviewed, but still quite under wraps and not really saying anything... They said. "She is so open and real". "She wears real cloths and is such a normal person", "Her kids are so normal" Pfffftttt, they look like caged puppies for ****s sake.... After hearing how folks got on Sarah for being a real person, and actually shopping at real stores I almost puked.. Michelle Obama clammed up totally during the election and was never seen without very expensive gowns and dresses, dressed up like a Barbie doll. Amazing how the lemmings can be so hypocritical. My wife says that Mrs. Obama wears the same sorts of clothes to work she does, and that they are not that pricey for a professional woman who goes to the office every day. Obama's kids are delightful little girls, and the older one already looks like she is going to be America's #1 heartbreaker in a couple of years. They are smart kids, reasonably well-behaved, and I feel certain neither of them are going to embarrass their parents by being public drunks or unmarried teen-aged mothers. I hope one of them marries one of my grandsons. That will never happen if either of them meets the grandson's grandfather. -- John Jiggle, jiggle...oh...is that a fish on the line...awwww....it's just a little herring. |
Will some heads at the NYT roll?
Salmonbait wrote:
On Tue, 23 Dec 2008 13:18:11 -0800 (PST), Tim wrote: On Dec 23, 6:56 am, Salmonbait wrote: And yes, some heads should roll at the NYT. But, they should have rolled a few years back. -- John Have a Super Christmas and a Spectacular New Year! yes, I feel they should, but do you think they will? No. The NYT is a liberal rag. Liberals, from my experience, could care less about the truth. Remember, morals are a religious, not a legal, concept. Therefore integrity is not a trait valued by liberals or secular progressives. Actually, you could figure that out right here in the NG. ;) -- John snerk |
Will some heads at the NYT roll?
Boater wrote:
Salmonbait wrote: On Tue, 23 Dec 2008 15:22:08 -0500, Boater wrote: wrote: On Dec 22, 11:21 pm, wrote: On Dec 22, 10:43 pm, Tim wrote: They should http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/7796700.stm But the same media attacked Palin for momentarily believing that someone calling into a radio talk show was the French President. She was on the spot, while the NYT had days to check on it and think about it before publishing. The liberal sheeple fell into lockstep behind the image. Amazing. I couldn't believe it the other day. A couple of nurses were talking about Michelle Obama who was being interviewed, but still quite under wraps and not really saying anything... They said. "She is so open and real". "She wears real cloths and is such a normal person", "Her kids are so normal" Pfffftttt, they look like caged puppies for ****s sake.... After hearing how folks got on Sarah for being a real person, and actually shopping at real stores I almost puked.. Michelle Obama clammed up totally during the election and was never seen without very expensive gowns and dresses, dressed up like a Barbie doll. Amazing how the lemmings can be so hypocritical. My wife says that Mrs. Obama wears the same sorts of clothes to work she does, and that they are not that pricey for a professional woman who goes to the office every day. Obama's kids are delightful little girls, and the older one already looks like she is going to be America's #1 heartbreaker in a couple of years. They are smart kids, reasonably well-behaved, and I feel certain neither of them are going to embarrass their parents by being public drunks or unmarried teen-aged mothers. I hope one of them marries one of my grandsons. That will never happen if either of them meets the grandson's grandfather. -- John Jiggle, jiggle...oh...is that a fish on the line...awwww....it's just a little herring. Lets project a little further. When Mrs O sits down with Krause for the dowry chat and leans forward to give ol' Harry that beady eyed evil stare of hers, He'll wet his pants. |
Will some heads at the NYT roll?
Salmonbait wrote:
On Tue, 23 Dec 2008 16:54:25 -0500, Jim wrote: Boater wrote: Salmonbait wrote: On Tue, 23 Dec 2008 15:22:08 -0500, Boater wrote: wrote: On Dec 22, 11:21 pm, wrote: On Dec 22, 10:43 pm, Tim wrote: They should http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/7796700.stm But the same media attacked Palin for momentarily believing that someone calling into a radio talk show was the French President. She was on the spot, while the NYT had days to check on it and think about it before publishing. The liberal sheeple fell into lockstep behind the image. Amazing. I couldn't believe it the other day. A couple of nurses were talking about Michelle Obama who was being interviewed, but still quite under wraps and not really saying anything... They said. "She is so open and real". "She wears real cloths and is such a normal person", "Her kids are so normal" Pfffftttt, they look like caged puppies for ****s sake.... After hearing how folks got on Sarah for being a real person, and actually shopping at real stores I almost puked.. Michelle Obama clammed up totally during the election and was never seen without very expensive gowns and dresses, dressed up like a Barbie doll. Amazing how the lemmings can be so hypocritical. My wife says that Mrs. Obama wears the same sorts of clothes to work she does, and that they are not that pricey for a professional woman who goes to the office every day. Obama's kids are delightful little girls, and the older one already looks like she is going to be America's #1 heartbreaker in a couple of years. They are smart kids, reasonably well-behaved, and I feel certain neither of them are going to embarrass their parents by being public drunks or unmarried teen-aged mothers. I hope one of them marries one of my grandsons. That will never happen if either of them meets the grandson's grandfather. -- John Jiggle, jiggle...oh...is that a fish on the line...awwww....it's just a little herring. Lets project a little further. When Mrs O sits down with Krause for the dowry chat and leans forward to give ol' Harry that beady eyed evil stare of hers, He'll wet his pants. He'll offer his $850 desk chair and the Lobsta Boat! Maybe he'll throw in the 'bobcat' for good measure. -- We say, "MERRY CHRISTMAS!" John Well, well, well...it didn't take you long to revert to your normal behaviour around here, Herring. What happened...did the meds wear off...or did you run out of spiked eggnog? |
Will some heads at the NYT roll?
On Tue, 23 Dec 2008 16:36:44 -0500, Salmonbait wrote:
On Tue, 23 Dec 2008 13:18:11 -0800 (PST), Tim wrote: On Dec 23, 6:56*am, Salmonbait wrote: And yes, some heads should roll at the NYT. But, they should have rolled a few years back. -- John Have a Super Christmas and a Spectacular New Year! yes, I feel they should, but do you think they will? No. The NYT is a liberal rag. Liberals, from my experience, could care less about the truth. Remember, morals are a religious, not a legal, concept. Therefore integrity is not a trait valued by liberals or secular progressives. Actually, you could figure that out right here in the NG. ;) Some of the most amoral creeps in time have been Popes. It damn sure isn't a religous concept. If you're interested do some homework. |
Will some heads at the NYT roll?
On Tue, 23 Dec 2008 16:54:25 -0500, Jim wrote:
Boater wrote: Salmonbait wrote: On Tue, 23 Dec 2008 15:22:08 -0500, Boater wrote: wrote: On Dec 22, 11:21 pm, wrote: On Dec 22, 10:43 pm, Tim wrote: They should http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/7796700.stm But the same media attacked Palin for momentarily believing that someone calling into a radio talk show was the French President. She was on the spot, while the NYT had days to check on it and think about it before publishing. The liberal sheeple fell into lockstep behind the image. Amazing. I couldn't believe it the other day. A couple of nurses were talking about Michelle Obama who was being interviewed, but still quite under wraps and not really saying anything... They said. "She is so open and real". "She wears real cloths and is such a normal person", "Her kids are so normal" Pfffftttt, they look like caged puppies for ****s sake.... After hearing how folks got on Sarah for being a real person, and actually shopping at real stores I almost puked.. Michelle Obama clammed up totally during the election and was never seen without very expensive gowns and dresses, dressed up like a Barbie doll. Amazing how the lemmings can be so hypocritical. My wife says that Mrs. Obama wears the same sorts of clothes to work she does, and that they are not that pricey for a professional woman who goes to the office every day. Obama's kids are delightful little girls, and the older one already looks like she is going to be America's #1 heartbreaker in a couple of years. They are smart kids, reasonably well-behaved, and I feel certain neither of them are going to embarrass their parents by being public drunks or unmarried teen-aged mothers. I hope one of them marries one of my grandsons. That will never happen if either of them meets the grandson's grandfather. -- John Jiggle, jiggle...oh...is that a fish on the line...awwww....it's just a little herring. Lets project a little further. When Mrs O sits down with Krause for the dowry chat and leans forward to give ol' Harry that beady eyed evil stare of hers, He'll wet his pants. He'll offer his $850 desk chair and the Lobsta Boat! Maybe he'll throw in the 'bobcat' for good measure. -- We say, "MERRY CHRISTMAS!" John |
Will some heads at the NYT roll?
On Tue, 23 Dec 2008 17:03:15 -0500, Boater wrote:
Salmonbait wrote: On Tue, 23 Dec 2008 16:54:25 -0500, Jim wrote: Boater wrote: Salmonbait wrote: On Tue, 23 Dec 2008 15:22:08 -0500, Boater wrote: wrote: On Dec 22, 11:21 pm, wrote: On Dec 22, 10:43 pm, Tim wrote: They should http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/7796700.stm But the same media attacked Palin for momentarily believing that someone calling into a radio talk show was the French President. She was on the spot, while the NYT had days to check on it and think about it before publishing. The liberal sheeple fell into lockstep behind the image. Amazing. I couldn't believe it the other day. A couple of nurses were talking about Michelle Obama who was being interviewed, but still quite under wraps and not really saying anything... They said. "She is so open and real". "She wears real cloths and is such a normal person", "Her kids are so normal" Pfffftttt, they look like caged puppies for ****s sake.... After hearing how folks got on Sarah for being a real person, and actually shopping at real stores I almost puked.. Michelle Obama clammed up totally during the election and was never seen without very expensive gowns and dresses, dressed up like a Barbie doll. Amazing how the lemmings can be so hypocritical. My wife says that Mrs. Obama wears the same sorts of clothes to work she does, and that they are not that pricey for a professional woman who goes to the office every day. Obama's kids are delightful little girls, and the older one already looks like she is going to be America's #1 heartbreaker in a couple of years. They are smart kids, reasonably well-behaved, and I feel certain neither of them are going to embarrass their parents by being public drunks or unmarried teen-aged mothers. I hope one of them marries one of my grandsons. That will never happen if either of them meets the grandson's grandfather. -- John Jiggle, jiggle...oh...is that a fish on the line...awwww....it's just a little herring. Lets project a little further. When Mrs O sits down with Krause for the dowry chat and leans forward to give ol' Harry that beady eyed evil stare of hers, He'll wet his pants. He'll offer his $850 desk chair and the Lobsta Boat! Maybe he'll throw in the 'bobcat' for good measure. -- We say, "MERRY CHRISTMAS!" John Well, well, well...it didn't take you long to revert to your normal behaviour around here, Herring. What happened...did the meds wear off...or did you run out of spiked eggnog? jiggle, jiggle, :) -- We say, "MERRY CHRISTMAS!" John |
Will some heads at the NYT roll?
On Tue, 23 Dec 2008 17:04:34 -0500, RLM wrote:
On Tue, 23 Dec 2008 16:36:44 -0500, Salmonbait wrote: On Tue, 23 Dec 2008 13:18:11 -0800 (PST), Tim wrote: On Dec 23, 6:56*am, Salmonbait wrote: And yes, some heads should roll at the NYT. But, they should have rolled a few years back. -- John Have a Super Christmas and a Spectacular New Year! yes, I feel they should, but do you think they will? No. The NYT is a liberal rag. Liberals, from my experience, could care less about the truth. Remember, morals are a religious, not a legal, concept. Therefore integrity is not a trait valued by liberals or secular progressives. Actually, you could figure that out right here in the NG. ;) Some of the most amoral creeps in time have been Popes. It damn sure isn't a religous concept. If you're interested do some homework. A religious concept isn't necessarily followed by 'religious' people. Look at Krause. He claims to be 'religious', but surely his faith doesn't promote lying and name-calling. -- We say, "MERRY CHRISTMAS!" John |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:24 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com