Speaking of shrink wrapping...
 

Speaking of shrink wrapping...
 

Boater wrote:
Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq. wrote:
Boater wrote:



If you had an old barn, your family members probably would shove you
into it, barricade the doors, pour gasoline on the wood siding, and
set it ablaze. That way, your wife could find herself a man who'd
rather spend time with her than pretend he was a golfer.

I don't know what religion you practice, but I am surprised that it
would endorse this kind of behavior.






Yours does...Leviticus 1:9

"But his inwards and his legs shall he wash in water: and the priest
shall burn all on the altar, to be a burnt sacrifice, an offering made
by fire, of "a sweet savour unto the LORD".

Guess again.

Speaking of shrink wrapping...
 

Boater wrote:
John wrote:
On Tue, 16 Dec 2008 07:56:34 -0500, "Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq."
wrote:

Boater wrote:


If you had an old barn, your family members probably would shove you
into it, barricade the doors, pour gasoline on the wood siding, and
set it ablaze. That way, your wife could find herself a man who'd
rather spend time with her than pretend he was a golfer.
I don't know what religion you practice, but I am surprised that it
would endorse this kind of behavior.




Wow, Harry's quoting the Torah.
From Leviticus 15, "'When any man has a discharge from his body, his
discharge is unclean. And this shall be his uncleanness in regard to his
discharge; whether his body runs with his discharge, or his body is
stopped
up by his discharge, it is his uncleanness. Every bed is unclean on which
he who has the discharge lies, and everything on which he sits shall be
unclean."

I wonder if he thinks of this in the morning when popping his
pustules. He
sounds like an 'old testament' kind of guy, which is OK. But, I don't
think
the Jewish faith would condone his behavior any more than the Christian
faith would.




Gee, I wonder if Reggie will send a snarky comment your way.

Nah.


Why should I, he didn't say anything I disagree with. Neither Jews or
Gentiles believe it is acceptable to torture and burn someone as a
sacrifice. I really don't know many that do.

Speaking of shrink wrapping...
 

On Dec 15, 4:58*pm, "Don White" wrote:

Do they make condoms big enough to slip over Justhate & LoonyToons heads and
all the way down to their feet. (all 5'5" of them)
That would be worthwhile- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

You know, your getting to be almost as big an asshole as Harry. You've
done NOTHING here but lie, accuse people of things without any
evidence of such, call people names like a silly third grader, and
insult. If you'd grow up, or at least quit trying to pander to your
lover Harry, perhaps you'd have an original thought once in awhile.

Speaking of shrink wrapping...
 

wrote in message
...
On Dec 15, 4:58 pm, "Don White" wrote:

Do they make condoms big enough to slip over Justhate & LoonyToons heads
and
all the way down to their feet. (all 5'5" of them)
That would be worthwhile- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

You know, *your* getting to be almost as big an asshole as Harry. You've
done NOTHING here but lie, accuse people of things without any
evidence of such, call people names like a silly third grader, and
insult. If you'd grow up, or at least quit trying to pander to your
lover Harry, perhaps you'd have an original thought once in awhile.

************************************************** *************

Here's something original...try using *you're* when substituting for 'you
are'........... wait a minute, any 5th grade kid knows that.

Speaking of shrink wrapping...
 

"John" wrote in message
...
On Mon, 15 Dec 2008 21:13:54 -0800, "Calif Bill"

wrote:


"Mike" wrote in message
. ..

"John" wrote in message
...
On Mon, 15 Dec 2008 09:17:53 -0800 (PST), Tim
wrote:

Knowing little aboutt he process. I wsould thinkt hat a made-to-fit
cover would be better. seeing that the shrink wrap would be tight
enought to promote mold (my opinion) or mildew I think I'd go with a
more loose-fitting cover myself. Besides, the cover can be reused time
and time again, where the wrap is peeled off in the spring then is
disposed of.

So is shrink wrap really that good of investment.

Of course I'm one to talk. I don't have a cover on my boats, but then
again, I store them in my warehouse.

You know, I wonder the same thing. I've got a nicely fitting canvas
cover,
propped up down the centerline with nylon rope which I can easily
tighten
when needed. The cover costs about $400, new, and I think it'll be good
for
at least four years, going by past experience.

I don't see the advantage of shrink wrap. This way, if there's a great
day
in January and I want to go out, I can do so.
--
John

John.

That makes more sense than shrink wrap. If a canvas cover runs 400
bucks,
that's about 3 years worth of shrink wrap. If the cover lasts 4 years,
you're ahead of the game. Shrink wrap never made any financial sense to
me. Maybe I'm missing something...

--Mike


Since I boat during the winter, I have a portable garage from Costco.
About
$180. Plus a $700 snap on boat cover. Since we get so little snow.
Maybe
an inch or two every 10 years, mine works to shelter the boat from sun
damage.


If I had the room, and a way to get the boat to the back yard, that's what
I'd do. Covering the cover will probably make it last twice as long.
--
John

My boat is in a storage yard.

Speaking of shrink wrapping...
 

On Dec 16, 2:52*pm, "Don White" wrote:
wrote in message

...
On Dec 15, 4:58 pm, "Don White" wrote:

Do they make condoms big enough to slip over Justhate & LoonyToons heads
and
all the way down to their feet. (all 5'5" of them)
That would be worthwhile- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

You know, *your* getting to be almost as big an asshole as Harry. You've
done NOTHING here but lie, accuse people of things without any
evidence of such, call people names like a silly third grader, and
insult. If you'd grow up, or at least quit trying to pander to your
lover Harry, perhaps you'd have an original thought once in awhile.

************************************************** *************

Here's something original...try using *you're* when substituting for 'you
are'........... wait a minute, any 5th grade kid knows that.

Fot the wife?

Speaking of shrink wrapping...
 

On Tue, 16 Dec 2008 12:53:08 -0500, "Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq."
wrote:

Why should I, he didn't say anything I disagree with. Neither Jews or
Gentiles believe it is acceptable to torture and burn someone as a
sacrifice. I really don't know many that do.

Ahem - certainly not as a sacrifice per se.

However as a...

Um....

Never mind. :)

Speaking of shrink wrapping...
 

Tom Francis - SWSports wrote:
On Tue, 16 Dec 2008 12:53:08 -0500, "Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq."
wrote:

Why should I, he didn't say anything I disagree with. Neither Jews or
Gentiles believe it is acceptable to torture and burn someone as a
sacrifice. I really don't know many that do.

Ahem - certainly not as a sacrifice per se.

However as a...

Um....

Never mind. :)


Reggie, apparently, is ignorant of religious history. What a surprise.

Speaking of shrink wrapping...
 

Boater wrote:
Tom Francis - SWSports wrote:
On Tue, 16 Dec 2008 12:53:08 -0500, "Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq."
wrote:

Why should I, he didn't say anything I disagree with. Neither Jews
or Gentiles believe it is acceptable to torture and burn someone as a
sacrifice. I really don't know many that do.

Ahem - certainly not as a sacrifice per se.

However as a...

Um....

Never mind. :)


Reggie, apparently, is ignorant of religious history. What a surprise.

You really do need to learn how to read. I didn't say "Jews and
Gentiles have never believed it is acceptable..... ". I said "Neither
Jews or Gentiles believe ... " which I think most people would interpret
to mean that today neither Jews or Gentiles believe it is acceptable to
torture and burn.

Speaking of shrink wrapping...
 

Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq. wrote:
Boater wrote:
Tom Francis - SWSports wrote:
On Tue, 16 Dec 2008 12:53:08 -0500, "Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq."
wrote:

Why should I, he didn't say anything I disagree with. Neither Jews
or Gentiles believe it is acceptable to torture and burn someone as
a sacrifice. I really don't know many that do.

Ahem - certainly not as a sacrifice per se.

However as a...

Um....

Never mind. :)


Reggie, apparently, is ignorant of religious history. What a surprise.

You really do need to learn how to read. I didn't say "Jews and
Gentiles have never believed it is acceptable..... ". I said "Neither
Jews or Gentiles believe ... " which I think most people would interpret
to mean that today neither Jews or Gentiles believe it is acceptable to
torture and burn.


I wouldn't presume to speak for either Jews or Gentiles. I do know there
are plenty of Jews and Gentiles in our society who think there is
nothing wrong with bombing villages or torturing captives.

Speaking of shrink wrapping...
 

Boater wrote:

We do know you think it is acceptable to kill someone because they
posted a link to a Christmas Carol, but I don't know of anyone else who
would agree with you.

Speaking of shrink wrapping...
 

Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq. wrote:
Boater wrote:

We do know you think it is acceptable to kill someone because they
posted a link to a Christmas Carol, but I don't know of anyone else who
would agree with you.


Always the clever quips from Reggie, the major genetic contributor to
Loogy.