|
Thanksgiving Stats, Rasmussen Style
http://tinyurl.com/6a58p5
Scott himself, doing the holiday rundown, survey-wise. First time I've ever seen his face... |
Thanksgiving Stats, Rasmussen Style
Boater wrote:
http://tinyurl.com/6a58p5 Scott himself, doing the holiday rundown, survey-wise. First time I've ever seen his face... Weird....tiny URL bombed. Maybe this will work: http://publish.vx.roo.com/rasmussen/...0&Format=flash |
Thanksgiving Stats, Rasmussen Style
On Thu, 27 Nov 2008 09:34:31 -0500, Boater
wrote: Boater wrote: http://tinyurl.com/6a58p5 Scott himself, doing the holiday rundown, survey-wise. First time I've ever seen his face... Weird....tiny URL bombed. Maybe this will work: http://publish.vx.roo.com/rasmussen/...0&Format=flash Seen him many times on Fox news. You should widen your horizons. --Vic |
Thanksgiving Stats, Rasmussen Style
Vic Smith wrote:
On Thu, 27 Nov 2008 09:34:31 -0500, Boater wrote: Boater wrote: http://tinyurl.com/6a58p5 Scott himself, doing the holiday rundown, survey-wise. First time I've ever seen his face... Weird....tiny URL bombed. Maybe this will work: http://publish.vx.roo.com/rasmussen/...0&Format=flash Seen him many times on Fox news. You should widen your horizons. --Vic I've tried a couple of times, but, seriously, it is so obviously biased, I break out in laughter every time. Most of the mainstream outlets are a bit more subtle. I'm just writing about the "news" programs on Faux. Their commentators, such as Hannity, O'Rally, and soon, Beck, are just plain trash. |
Thanksgiving Stats, Rasmussen Style
On Nov 27, 10:15*am, Vic Smith
wrote: On Thu, 27 Nov 2008 09:34:31 -0500, Boater wrote: Boater wrote: http://tinyurl.com/6a58p5 Scott himself, doing the holiday rundown, survey-wise. First time I've ever seen his face... Weird....tiny URL bombed. Maybe this will work: http://publish.vx.roo.com/rasmussen/...mussen+Reports.... Seen him many times on Fox news. *You should widen your horizons. --Vic Harry like most elite liberals intentionally ignores half of the country that does not fall in lock step. I always hear them talking about "being infomed" but at the same time how they won't listen to the other side, just not interested... |
Thanksgiving Stats, Rasmussen Style
On Thu, 27 Nov 2008 09:32:58 -0500, Boater
wrote: http://tinyurl.com/6a58p5 Scott himself, doing the holiday rundown, survey-wise. First time I've ever seen his face... Harry - give it up please? You're really getting to be annoying. |
Thanksgiving Stats, Rasmussen Style
On Thu, 27 Nov 2008 10:31:28 -0500, Boater
wrote: I've tried a couple of times, but, seriously, it is so obviously biased, I break out in laughter every time. Most of the mainstream outlets are a bit more subtle. I really think MSNBC is the laughing stock of any sane person. Hey, you can't see Dick Morris make a fool of himself if you don't watch Fox. I'm just writing about the "news" programs on Faux. Their commentators, such as Hannity, O'Rally, and soon, Beck, are just plain trash. They have their news slant, but actually have a better news arm than the other networks from what I've seen. CNN still reigns on the international front. I think Hannity and Beck are idiots. If you can ignore O'Reilly's pomposity - difficult, but doable - he's not bad if you're interested in the subject matter he's discussing. Good polemicist. You actually get different points of view, agree or not. All IMHO. --Vic |
Thanksgiving Stats, Rasmussen Style
Short Wave Sportfishing wrote:
On Thu, 27 Nov 2008 09:32:58 -0500, Boater wrote: http://tinyurl.com/6a58p5 Scott himself, doing the holiday rundown, survey-wise. First time I've ever seen his face... Harry - give it up please? You're really getting to be annoying. What's your point here? I've never seen Rasmussen. I read his site, but I've never seen him. Did you see something insulting in my comment that I've never seen the guy on TV or in a magazine? Well, until I looked at his video, I hadn't. |
Thanksgiving Stats, Rasmussen Style
Vic Smith wrote:
On Thu, 27 Nov 2008 10:31:28 -0500, Boater wrote: I've tried a couple of times, but, seriously, it is so obviously biased, I break out in laughter every time. Most of the mainstream outlets are a bit more subtle. I really think MSNBC is the laughing stock of any sane person. Hey, you can't see Dick Morris make a fool of himself if you don't watch Fox. I'm just writing about the "news" programs on Faux. Their commentators, such as Hannity, O'Rally, and soon, Beck, are just plain trash. They have their news slant, but actually have a better news arm than the other networks from what I've seen. CNN still reigns on the international front. I think Hannity and Beck are idiots. If you can ignore O'Reilly's pomposity - difficult, but doable - he's not bad if you're interested in the subject matter he's discussing. Good polemicist. You actually get different points of view, agree or not. All IMHO. --Vic I watched O'Rally a couple of times because I was wondering why Olbermann kept poking fun at him. I understood almost immediately. You call O'Rally pompous...I suppose my calling him a gasbag is about the same. My favorite cable commentator is Rachel Maddow. She's very smart, very fast, and very nice. Also very funny. |
Thanksgiving Stats, Rasmussen Style
On Thu, 27 Nov 2008 10:40:57 -0500, Short Wave Sportfishing
wrote: You're really getting to be annoying. Yes, but that's his (w)hole game. If we could get everyone to stop playing the fun would be out of it. |
Thanksgiving Stats, Rasmussen Style
On Thu, 27 Nov 2008 11:04:37 -0500, Boater
wrote: Vic Smith wrote: On Thu, 27 Nov 2008 10:31:28 -0500, Boater wrote: I've tried a couple of times, but, seriously, it is so obviously biased, I break out in laughter every time. Most of the mainstream outlets are a bit more subtle. I really think MSNBC is the laughing stock of any sane person. Hey, you can't see Dick Morris make a fool of himself if you don't watch Fox. I'm just writing about the "news" programs on Faux. Their commentators, such as Hannity, O'Rally, and soon, Beck, are just plain trash. They have their news slant, but actually have a better news arm than the other networks from what I've seen. CNN still reigns on the international front. I think Hannity and Beck are idiots. If you can ignore O'Reilly's pomposity - difficult, but doable - he's not bad if you're interested in the subject matter he's discussing. Good polemicist. You actually get different points of view, agree or not. All IMHO. --Vic I watched O'Rally a couple of times because I was wondering why Olbermann kept poking fun at him. I understood almost immediately. You call O'Rally pompous...I suppose my calling him a gasbag is about the same. My favorite cable commentator is Rachel Maddow. She's very smart, very fast, and very nice. Also very funny. Not interested. Because like Olbermann - who I heard got her the show - she surrounds herself with people who agree with her. And like him, she beats the same drum over and over and over. Booooring. Pretty much like Fox gets on a rag about something. With Olbermann, Maddow and you it's Palin at the Turkey Farm. With Fox it's Eric Holder pardoning Adolf Hitler. Hey, that's what boats, the channel flipper and mouse button are for. Escape from the boring or repetitious. IMHO. --Vic |
Thanksgiving Stats, Rasmussen Style
On Nov 27, 10:04*am, Boater wrote:
Vic Smith wrote: On Thu, 27 Nov 2008 10:31:28 -0500, Boater wrote: I've tried a couple of times, but, seriously, it is so obviously biased, I break out in laughter every time. Most of the mainstream outlets are a bit more subtle. I really think MSNBC is the laughing stock of any sane person. Hey, you can't see Dick Morris make a fool of himself if you don't watch Fox. I'm just writing about the "news" programs on Faux. Their commentators, such as Hannity, O'Rally, and soon, Beck, are just plain trash. They have their news slant, but actually have a better news arm than the other networks from what I've seen. *CNN still reigns on the international front. I think Hannity and Beck are idiots. *If you can ignore O'Reilly's pomposity - difficult, but doable - he's not bad if you're interested in the subject matter he's discussing. *Good polemicist. You actually get different points of view, agree or not. All IMHO. --Vic * I watched O'Rally a couple of times because I was wondering why Olbermann kept poking fun at him. I understood almost immediately. You call O'Rally pompous...I suppose my calling him a gasbag is about the same. My favorite cable commentator is Rachel Maddow. She's very smart, very fast, and very nice. Also very funny. The "Rhode Scholar" Dike? She and Barney Frank should become legally married. At least they would look legitimate. |
Thanksgiving Stats, Rasmussen Style
On Nov 27, 11:24*am, Vic Smith
wrote: On Thu, 27 Nov 2008 11:04:37 -0500, Boater wrote: Vic Smith wrote: On Thu, 27 Nov 2008 10:31:28 -0500, Boater wrote: I've tried a couple of times, but, seriously, it is so obviously biased, I break out in laughter every time. Most of the mainstream outlets are a bit more subtle. I really think MSNBC is the laughing stock of any sane person. Hey, you can't see Dick Morris make a fool of himself if you don't watch Fox. I'm just writing about the "news" programs on Faux. Their commentators, such as Hannity, O'Rally, and soon, Beck, are just plain trash. They have their news slant, but actually have a better news arm than the other networks from what I've seen. *CNN still reigns on the international front. I think Hannity and Beck are idiots. *If you can ignore O'Reilly's pomposity - difficult, but doable - he's not bad if you're interested in the subject matter he's discussing. *Good polemicist. You actually get different points of view, agree or not. All IMHO. --Vic * I watched O'Rally a couple of times because I was wondering why Olbermann kept poking fun at him. I understood almost immediately. You call O'Rally pompous...I suppose my calling him a gasbag is about the same. My favorite cable commentator is Rachel Maddow. She's very smart, very fast, and very nice. Also very funny. Not interested. *Because like Olbermann - who I heard got her the show - she surrounds herself with people who agree with her. And like him, she beats the same drum over and over and over. Booooring. *Pretty much like Fox gets on a rag about something. With Olbermann, Maddow and you it's Palin at the Turkey Farm. With Fox it's Eric Holder pardoning Adolf Hitler. Hey, that's what boats, the channel flipper and mouse button are for. Escape from the boring or repetitious. IMHO. * --Vic- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Funny, I have never heard Holder mentioned on FOX.. Olbermann just sets off my "gaydar" like most of his cronies at the least watched "news" channel in history.... |
Thanksgiving Stats, Rasmussen Style
|
Thanksgiving Stats, Rasmussen Style
On Nov 27, 12:06*pm, Vic Smith
wrote: On Thu, 27 Nov 2008 08:52:14 -0800 (PST), wrote: Funny, I have never heard Holder mentioned on FOX.. Olbermann just sets off my "gaydar" like most of his cronies at the least watched "news" channel in history.... They ragged on Holder for a couple days. *At least. Think Olbermann is a fag? Never got that impression, but he is one silly guy. Before he got his own show he was pretty "straight" with the news and commentary. *Now he sets off my "gagdar." --Vic Well, not gay in a sexual manner, just gay... can't explain. Anyway, the guy is like watching saturday night live, except without the clever slant. Never seen anybody so full of **** on "serious" tv.. |
Thanksgiving Stats, Rasmussen Style
On Nov 27, 10:33*am, wrote:
On Nov 27, 10:15*am, Vic Smith wrote: On Thu, 27 Nov 2008 09:34:31 -0500, Boater wrote: Boater wrote: http://tinyurl.com/6a58p5 Scott himself, doing the holiday rundown, survey-wise. First time I've ever seen his face... Weird....tiny URL bombed. Maybe this will work: http://publish.vx.roo.com/rasmussen/...mussen+Reports... Seen him many times on Fox news. *You should widen your horizons. --Vic Harry like most elite liberals intentionally ignores half of the country that does not fall in lock step. I always hear them talking about "being infomed" but at the same time how they won't listen to the other side, just not interested...- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Isn't funny to watch Harry now that everyone has his personal info? He's now asking everybody to not insult!!!! He needs to clean up his own backyard first. |
Thanksgiving Stats, Rasmussen Style
On Nov 27, 11:13*am, Wayne.B wrote:
On Thu, 27 Nov 2008 10:40:57 -0500, Short Wave Sportfishing wrote: You're really getting to be annoying. Yes, but that's his (w)hole game. * If we could get everyone to stop playing the fun would be out of it. The gasbag Harry is the most insulting, vulgar low life here, and now he's running around asking people to quit being insulting! It's because he's a coward, everyone has his info now, and he's scared. |
Thanksgiving Stats, Rasmussen Style
"Boater" wrote in message ... Vic Smith wrote: Seen him many times on Fox news. You should widen your horizons. --Vic I've tried a couple of times, but, seriously, it is so obviously biased, I break out in laughter every time. Most of the mainstream outlets are a bit more subtle. Like Keith Olbermann and Rachel Maddow? Eisboch |
Thanksgiving Stats, Rasmussen Style
wrote in message ... Well, not gay in a sexual manner, just gay... can't explain. Anyway, the guy is like watching saturday night live, except without the clever slant. Never seen anybody so full of **** on "serious" tv.. ------------------------------------------ I am not normally a violent guy, but the small LCD television I use in my office almost bought the farm a couple of time while trying to watch that smug, slime filled jerk. I noticed last night that his hair transformation is almost complete. Dark to silver grey in about 3 months. Must be a highly stressful job, counting all his money, huh? Eisboch |
Thanksgiving Stats, Rasmussen Style
Eisboch wrote:
"Boater" wrote in message ... Vic Smith wrote: Seen him many times on Fox news. You should widen your horizons. --Vic I've tried a couple of times, but, seriously, it is so obviously biased, I break out in laughter every time. Most of the mainstream outlets are a bit more subtle. Like Keith Olbermann and Rachel Maddow? Eisboch Olbermann and Maddow are commentators, not newscasters. I was talking about the Faux News *new* shows at first. Then Hannity and O'Rally came up. They are not newscasters, either. I enjoyed Olbermann skewer Bush like no one else had the balls to do. But I like Maddow more. She's a lot more fun. I'd love to have Rachel and her partner over to dinner. |
Thanksgiving Stats, Rasmussen Style
Eisboch wrote:
wrote in message ... Well, not gay in a sexual manner, just gay... can't explain. Anyway, the guy is like watching saturday night live, except without the clever slant. Never seen anybody so full of **** on "serious" tv.. ------------------------------------------ I am not normally a violent guy, but the small LCD television I use in my office almost bought the farm a couple of time while trying to watch that smug, slime filled jerk. I noticed last night that his hair transformation is almost complete. Dark to silver grey in about 3 months. Must be a highly stressful job, counting all his money, huh? Eisboch Unlike Sean Hannity, whose comments gave the impetus to a brain-dead conservative to shoot up a Unitarian church, nothing Olbermann has said has sparked a braindead liberal into shooting up a Baptist church. |
Thanksgiving Stats, Rasmussen Style
On Nov 27, 1:13*pm, "Eisboch" wrote:
wrote in message ... Well, not gay in a sexual manner, just gay... can't explain. Anyway, the guy is like watching saturday night live, except without the clever slant. Never seen anybody so full of **** on "serious" tv.. ------------------------------------------ I am not normally a violent guy, but the small LCD television I use in my office almost bought the farm a couple of time while trying to watch that smug, slime filled jerk. I noticed last night that his hair transformation is almost complete. *Dark to silver grey in about 3 months. Must be a highly stressful job, counting all his money, huh? Eisboch I just don't see how anybody could consider him and most over there as serious newscasters. I have a feeling it's more entertainment to most viewers, kind of like listening to Jon Stewart or reading the Daily Kos. My oldest listens to nothing but NPR, no TV, and sometimes reads the New York Lies on line. Most currant issues go right over her head, but she has all the talking points and considers herself informed.. It's just nuts... |
Thanksgiving Stats, Rasmussen Style
|
Thanksgiving Stats, Rasmussen Style
|
Thanksgiving Stats, Rasmussen Style
On Nov 27, 2:10*pm, Boater wrote:
wrote: On Nov 27, 1:13 pm, "Eisboch" wrote: wrote in message .... Well, not gay in a sexual manner, just gay... can't explain. Anyway, the guy is like watching saturday night live, except without the clever slant. Never seen anybody so full of **** on "serious" tv.. ------------------------------------------ I am not normally a violent guy, but the small LCD television I use in my office almost bought the farm a couple of time while trying to watch that smug, slime filled jerk. I noticed last night that his hair transformation is almost complete. *Dark to silver grey in about 3 months. Must be a highly stressful job, counting all his money, huh? Eisboch I just don't see how anybody could consider him and most over there as serious newscasters. I have a feeling it's more entertainment to most viewers, kind of like listening to Jon Stewart or reading the Daily Kos. My oldest listens to nothing but NPR, no TV, and sometimes reads the New York Lies on line. Most currant issues go right over her head, but she has all the talking points and considers herself informed.. It's just nuts... Olbermann is not considered a "newscaster," and neither is my gal Rachel. They are commentators, just like Hannity and O'Rally, but not nearly as nasty as their Faux News counterparts.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Unfortunately, not nearly as honest and concerened with fairness either.. |
Thanksgiving Stats, Rasmussen Style
|
Thanksgiving Stats, Rasmussen Style
On Nov 27, 3:10*pm, Boater wrote:
Olbermann is not considered a "newscaster," and neither is my gal Rachel. They are commentators, just like Hannity and O'Rally, but not nearly as nasty as their Faux News counterparts.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Unfortunately, not nearly as honest and concerened with fairness either.. Interesting. I've not come across much serious commentary calling Hannity or O'Rally honest. That's what happens when you count on intellectually dishonest and elitist sources for your world view... Stupid out of context or just plain re-edited (we know you too well) cut and paste aside... |
Thanksgiving Stats, Rasmussen Style
On Nov 27, 2:08*pm, Boater wrote:
wrote: On Nov 27, 10:04 am, Boater wrote: Vic Smith wrote: On Thu, 27 Nov 2008 10:31:28 -0500, Boater wrote: I've tried a couple of times, but, seriously, it is so obviously biased, I break out in laughter every time. Most of the mainstream outlets are a bit more subtle. I really think MSNBC is the laughing stock of any sane person. Hey, you can't see Dick Morris make a fool of himself if you don't watch Fox. I'm just writing about the "news" programs on Faux. Their commentators, such as Hannity, O'Rally, and soon, Beck, are just plain trash. They have their news slant, but actually have a better news arm than the other networks from what I've seen. *CNN still reigns on the international front. I think Hannity and Beck are idiots. *If you can ignore O'Reilly's pomposity - difficult, but doable - he's not bad if you're interested in the subject matter he's discussing. *Good polemicist. You actually get different points of view, agree or not. All IMHO. --Vic * I watched O'Rally a couple of times because I was wondering why Olbermann kept poking fun at him. I understood almost immediately. You call O'Rally pompous...I suppose my calling him a gasbag is about the same. My favorite cable commentator is Rachel Maddow. She's very smart, very fast, and very nice. Also very funny. The "Rhode Scholar" *Dike? *She and Barney Frank should become legally married. At least they would look legitimate. Rachel is gay. So what? I don't want to have sex with her, I want to be informed a little and entertained a lot by her. And like Maddow, Frank is very, very smart. I prefer *smart* political leaders, which probably is one of the reasons why I disliked George W. Bush so much. Frank also is at the top of the class in providing *constituents with the kinds of services that keep getting him re-elected in his district, and in championing civil right and civil liberties issues. Frank has his faults and has misstepped a few times, but the same can be said about everyone else. I appreciate Frank helping to "out" those conservative Republicans still in the closet who are gay and speak out against gays and gay rights. I've never understood the outright hatred some on the right express for gays.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Hey, at least Bush was smart enough to not have to lie about his education, eh Yale boy? |
Thanksgiving Stats, Rasmussen Style
Boater wrote:
Eisboch wrote: "Boater" wrote in message ... Vic Smith wrote: Seen him many times on Fox news. You should widen your horizons. --Vic I've tried a couple of times, but, seriously, it is so obviously biased, I break out in laughter every time. Most of the mainstream outlets are a bit more subtle. Like Keith Olbermann and Rachel Maddow? Eisboch Olbermann and Maddow are commentators, not newscasters. I was talking about the Faux News *new* shows at first. Then Hannity and O'Rally came up. They are not newscasters, either. I enjoyed Olbermann skewer Bush like no one else had the balls to do. But I like Maddow more. She's a lot more fun. I'd love to have Rachel and her partner over to dinner. Where? Your wife's house? Nice! |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:32 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com