....Sarah Palin...

A new website has three new TV commercials thanking the ditz for her
great work during the last campaign...

http://www.ourcountrydeservesbetter.com/


And the latest Gallup poll says Republicans favor her for the 2012
nomination.

I love it!

On Mon, 24 Nov 2008 16:45:33 -0500, Boater wrote:

...Sarah Palin...

A new website has three new TV commercials thanking the ditz for her
great work during the last campaign...

http://www.ourcountrydeservesbetter.com/


And the latest Gallup poll says Republicans favor her for the 2012
nomination.

I love it!

Gosh, Harry. Thanks a lot for the Palin posts!

How was the pustule problem this morning?
--
A Harry Krause truism:

"It's not a *baby* kicking, beautiful bride, it's just a fetus!"

"Boater" wrote in message
...
...Sarah Palin...

A new website has three new TV commercials thanking the ditz for her great
work during the last campaign...

http://www.ourcountrydeservesbetter.com/


And the latest Gallup poll says Republicans favor her for the 2012
nomination.

I love it!


Ah, huh. Right now we are enjoying Reggie's outstanding photos.
But thanks for trying.

Eisboch

Eisboch wrote:
"Boater" wrote in message
...
...Sarah Palin...

A new website has three new TV commercials thanking the ditz for her great
work during the last campaign...

http://www.ourcountrydeservesbetter.com/


And the latest Gallup poll says Republicans favor her for the 2012
nomination.

I love it!


Ah, huh. Right now we are enjoying Reggie's outstanding photos.
But thanks for trying.

Eisboch




More black horsies hiding in a coal bin, or photoshopped shots of nature
as she is never seen?

On Mon, 24 Nov 2008 20:06:15 -0500, Boater wrote:

Eisboch wrote:
"Boater" wrote in message
...
...Sarah Palin...

A new website has three new TV commercials thanking the ditz for her great
work during the last campaign...

http://www.ourcountrydeservesbetter.com/


And the latest Gallup poll says Republicans favor her for the 2012
nomination.

I love it!


Ah, huh. Right now we are enjoying Reggie's outstanding photos.
But thanks for trying.

Eisboch




More black horsies hiding in a coal bin, or photoshopped shots of nature
as she is never seen?

Even more jealousy. Damn, Harry, just get your wife to show you how to use
that little Canon of hers.

BTW, did you ever post that 'alleged email' you threatened Jim with?
--
A Harry Krause truism:

"It's not a *baby* kicking, beautiful bride, it's just a fetus!"

JohnH wrote:
On Mon, 24 Nov 2008 20:06:15 -0500, Boater wrote:

Eisboch wrote:
"Boater" wrote in message
...
...Sarah Palin...

A new website has three new TV commercials thanking the ditz for her great
work during the last campaign...

http://www.ourcountrydeservesbetter.com/


And the latest Gallup poll says Republicans favor her for the 2012
nomination.

I love it!

Ah, huh. Right now we are enjoying Reggie's outstanding photos.
But thanks for trying.

Eisboch



More black horsies hiding in a coal bin, or photoshopped shots of nature
as she is never seen?

Even more jealousy. Damn, Harry, just get your wife to show you how to use
that little Canon of hers.


Jealous of Doral36/Reggie/55 other handles? Unlikely.

I see you learned how to spell the Canon brand name, after having
misspelled it here about 50 times. I suppose that is some sort of proof
even dimwits like you can learn.

Sorry, I just am not a fan of photographic surrealism when it comes to
nature. I know Reggie and SW Tom are. Not my taste. I use photoshop a
little to crop, or clear out a skin blemish, or to lighten or darken a
photo a bit, but that's about it, usually. Actually, I don't use
photoshop as much as I use Aperture, which I find more suitable for
those of us with a light touch in such matters.

But Aperture only runs on Macs so far as I know...and since you can
barely turn on a PC...well...

On Tue, 25 Nov 2008 07:13:30 -0500, Boater wrote:

JohnH wrote:
On Mon, 24 Nov 2008 20:06:15 -0500, Boater wrote:

Eisboch wrote:
"Boater" wrote in message
...
...Sarah Palin...

A new website has three new TV commercials thanking the ditz for her great
work during the last campaign...

http://www.ourcountrydeservesbetter.com/


And the latest Gallup poll says Republicans favor her for the 2012
nomination.

I love it!

Ah, huh. Right now we are enjoying Reggie's outstanding photos.
But thanks for trying.

Eisboch



More black horsies hiding in a coal bin, or photoshopped shots of nature
as she is never seen?

Even more jealousy. Damn, Harry, just get your wife to show you how to use
that little Canon of hers.


Jealous of Doral36/Reggie/55 other handles? Unlikely.

I see you learned how to spell the Canon brand name, after having
misspelled it here about 50 times. I suppose that is some sort of proof
even dimwits like you can learn.

Sorry, I just am not a fan of photographic surrealism when it comes to
nature. I know Reggie and SW Tom are. Not my taste. I use photoshop a
little to crop, or clear out a skin blemish, or to lighten or darken a
photo a bit, but that's about it, usually. Actually, I don't use
photoshop as much as I use Aperture, which I find more suitable for
those of us with a light touch in such matters.

But Aperture only runs on Macs so far as I know...and since you can
barely turn on a PC...well...

Again, get your wife to explain the Canon. You'll never need Aperture
again.
--
A Harry Krause truism:

"It's not a *baby* kicking, beautiful bride, it's just a fetus!"

On Nov 24, 8:06*pm, Boater wrote:
Eisboch wrote:
"Boater" wrote in message
...
...Sarah Palin...

A new website has three new TV commercials thanking the ditz for her great
work during the last campaign...

http://www.ourcountrydeservesbetter.com/

And the latest Gallup poll says Republicans favor her for the 2012
nomination.

I love it!

Ah, huh. * *Right now we are enjoying Reggie's outstanding photos.
But thanks for trying.

Eisboch

More black horsies hiding in a coal bin, or photoshopped shots of nature
as she is never seen?- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Harry, I take it you don't realize this, but what we see with our eyes
is many times "photshopped". You see, the eye can and does squint,
dialate, etc. You can even make things appear two dimensional just
close one eye. A camera, however, doesn't do this without
manipulation, therefore it takes human intervention.