|
How long in the desert?
That was one of the questions asked at a breakfast meeting I attended today with a financial services client and a couple of others across the river in Alexandria. More specifically, how long will the Republicans be wandering in the desert until they can elect a president again? Consensus: 16-20 years, minimum, and maybe never unless the party makes significant changes in its attitudes towards Latinos, blacks, social issues. The financial services guy manages several funds, including a large-cap fund. He thinks many of today's large-cap corporations will never come back, and if there is a market rebound, the smaller corporations will lead the way. His advice to me: stay the hell away from "the market." Oh...the financial times we're in right now...some fund managers are referring to it as the "Bush Recession," and others, the "Bush Depression." |
How long in the desert?
On Nov 24, 2:51*pm, Boater wrote:
That was one of the questions asked at a breakfast meeting I attended today with a financial services client and a couple of others across the river in Alexandria. More specifically, how long will the Republicans be wandering in the desert until they can elect a president again? Consensus: *16-20 years, minimum, and maybe never unless the party makes significant changes in its attitudes towards Latinos, blacks, social issues. The financial services guy manages several funds, including a large-cap fund. He thinks many of today's large-cap corporations will never come back, and if there is a market rebound, the smaller corporations will lead the way. His advice to me: stay the hell away from "the market." Oh...the financial times we're in right now...some fund managers are referring to it as the "Bush Recession," and others, the "Bush Depression.." If that's true then you must run with some damned stupid "fund managers". They don't know the meaning of "recession" OR "depression" in regards to the U.S. economy. |
How long in the desert?
Boater wrote:
That was one of the questions asked at a breakfast meeting I attended today with a financial services client and a couple of others across the river in Alexandria. More specifically, how long will the Republicans be wandering in the desert until they can elect a president again? Consensus: 16-20 years, minimum, and maybe never unless the party makes significant changes in its attitudes towards Latinos, blacks, social issues. The financial services guy manages several funds, including a large-cap fund. He thinks many of today's large-cap corporations will never come back, and if there is a market rebound, the smaller corporations will lead the way. His advice to me: stay the hell away from "the market." Oh...the financial times we're in right now...some fund managers are referring to it as the "Bush Recession," and others, the "Bush Depression." When obama fails to give free gas, cars and rent to his constituents as they think he promised, any Republican will beat him in 2012 possible 2008 |
How long in the desert?
JohnH wrote:
On Mon, 24 Nov 2008 14:51:17 -0500, Boater wrote: That was one of the questions asked at a breakfast meeting I attended today with a financial services client and a couple of others across the river in Alexandria. More specifically, how long will the Republicans be wandering in the desert until they can elect a president again? Consensus: 16-20 years, minimum, and maybe never unless the party makes significant changes in its attitudes towards Latinos, blacks, social issues. The financial services guy manages several funds, including a large-cap fund. He thinks many of today's large-cap corporations will never come back, and if there is a market rebound, the smaller corporations will lead the way. His advice to me: stay the hell away from "the market." Oh...the financial times we're in right now...some fund managers are referring to it as the "Bush Recession," and others, the "Bush Depression." Sounds like an equally represented group of liberals and conservatives to me. Harry, are you over your rancor yet? Rancor? Hehehe. Eat schitt and die. Soon. BTW, I had a nice meeting in the coffee shop at the Hotel Monaco in your fair city. Weird lobby decor, though. I resisted the urge to drive over to your place and drop off a doggy bag. |
How long in the desert?
On Mon, 24 Nov 2008 14:51:17 -0500, Boater wrote:
That was one of the questions asked at a breakfast meeting I attended today with a financial services client and a couple of others across the river in Alexandria. More specifically, how long will the Republicans be wandering in the desert until they can elect a president again? Consensus: 16-20 years, minimum, and maybe never unless the party makes significant changes in its attitudes towards Latinos, blacks, social issues. The financial services guy manages several funds, including a large-cap fund. He thinks many of today's large-cap corporations will never come back, and if there is a market rebound, the smaller corporations will lead the way. His advice to me: stay the hell away from "the market." Oh...the financial times we're in right now...some fund managers are referring to it as the "Bush Recession," and others, the "Bush Depression." Sounds like an equally represented group of liberals and conservatives to me. Harry, are you over your rancor yet? -- A Harry Krause truism: "It's not a *baby* kicking, beautiful bride, it's just a fetus!" |
How long in the desert?
On Mon, 24 Nov 2008 18:57:40 -0500, Boater wrote:
JohnH wrote: On Mon, 24 Nov 2008 14:51:17 -0500, Boater wrote: That was one of the questions asked at a breakfast meeting I attended today with a financial services client and a couple of others across the river in Alexandria. More specifically, how long will the Republicans be wandering in the desert until they can elect a president again? Consensus: 16-20 years, minimum, and maybe never unless the party makes significant changes in its attitudes towards Latinos, blacks, social issues. The financial services guy manages several funds, including a large-cap fund. He thinks many of today's large-cap corporations will never come back, and if there is a market rebound, the smaller corporations will lead the way. His advice to me: stay the hell away from "the market." Oh...the financial times we're in right now...some fund managers are referring to it as the "Bush Recession," and others, the "Bush Depression." Sounds like an equally represented group of liberals and conservatives to me. Harry, are you over your rancor yet? Rancor? Hehehe. Eat schitt and die. Soon. That sounds rancorous to me! BTW, I had a nice meeting in the coffee shop at the Hotel Monaco in your fair city. Weird lobby decor, though. I resisted the urge to drive over to your place and drop off a doggy bag. As long as it wasn't your pustule stuff! I'd have just brought it up to your house and returned it. -- A Harry Krause truism: "It's not a *baby* kicking, beautiful bride, it's just a fetus!" |
How long in the desert?
"Boater" wrote in message ... That was one of the questions asked at a breakfast meeting I attended today with a financial services client and a couple of others across the river in Alexandria. More specifically, how long will the Republicans be wandering in the desert until they can elect a president again? Consensus: 16-20 years, minimum, and maybe never unless the party makes significant changes in its attitudes towards Latinos, blacks, social issues. The financial services guy manages several funds, including a large-cap fund. He thinks many of today's large-cap corporations will never come back, and if there is a market rebound, the smaller corporations will lead the way. His advice to me: stay the hell away from "the market." Oh...the financial times we're in right now...some fund managers are referring to it as the "Bush Recession," and others, the "Bush Depression." You should have asked them if the Red Sox will win the pennant next year. Eisboch |
How long in the desert?
On Nov 24, 7:32*pm, "Eisboch" wrote:
"Boater" wrote in message ... That was one of the questions asked at a breakfast meeting I attended today with a financial services client and a couple of others across the river in Alexandria. More specifically, how long will the Republicans be wandering in the desert until they can elect a president again? Consensus: *16-20 years, minimum, and maybe never unless the party makes significant changes in its attitudes towards Latinos, blacks, social issues. The financial services guy manages several funds, including a large-cap fund. He thinks many of today's large-cap corporations will never come back, and if there is a market rebound, the smaller corporations will lead the way. His advice to me: stay the hell away from "the market." Oh...the financial times we're in right now...some fund managers are referring to it as the "Bush Recession," and others, the "Bush Depression." You should have asked them if the Red Sox will win the pennant next year. Eisboch- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Well, if they get the "censorship doctrine" (fairness doctrine) and keep funding voter fraud through ACORN, it could indeed be a while before republicans are able to speak their point of view... |
How long in the desert?
|
How long in the desert?
On Nov 24, 8:05*pm, Boater wrote:
wrote: On Nov 24, 7:32 pm, "Eisboch" wrote: "Boater" wrote in message ... That was one of the questions asked at a breakfast meeting I attended today with a financial services client and a couple of others across the river in Alexandria. More specifically, how long will the Republicans be wandering in the desert until they can elect a president again? Consensus: *16-20 years, minimum, and maybe never unless the party makes significant changes in its attitudes towards Latinos, blacks, social issues. The financial services guy manages several funds, including a large-cap fund. He thinks many of today's large-cap corporations will never come back, and if there is a market rebound, the smaller corporations will lead the way. His advice to me: stay the hell away from "the market." Oh...the financial times we're in right now...some fund managers are referring to it as the "Bush Recession," and others, the "Bush Depression." You should have asked them if the Red Sox will win the pennant next year. Eisboch- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Well, if they get the "censorship doctrine" (fairness doctrine) and keep funding voter fraud through ACORN, it could indeed be a while before republicans are able to speak their point of view... Are you actually stating that reich-wing Republican radio is all that the GOP has to reach its troops? You boys are betting the future of the party on the drug-taking boil known as Rush Limbaugh?- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Somewhere in your fairytale land maybe, but the censorship doctrine is on the way and I just saw an ad for the bill that would take away our right to a secret ballot on Unions. The trashing of the constitution is just beginning, despite the lies and misrepresentations of the left for the last 8 years.. |
How long in the desert?
On Nov 24, 8:05*pm, Boater wrote:
wrote: On Nov 24, 7:32 pm, "Eisboch" wrote: "Boater" wrote in message ... That was one of the questions asked at a breakfast meeting I attended today with a financial services client and a couple of others across the river in Alexandria. More specifically, how long will the Republicans be wandering in the desert until they can elect a president again? Consensus: *16-20 years, minimum, and maybe never unless the party makes significant changes in its attitudes towards Latinos, blacks, social issues. The financial services guy manages several funds, including a large-cap fund. He thinks many of today's large-cap corporations will never come back, and if there is a market rebound, the smaller corporations will lead the way. His advice to me: stay the hell away from "the market." Oh...the financial times we're in right now...some fund managers are referring to it as the "Bush Recession," and others, the "Bush Depression." You should have asked them if the Red Sox will win the pennant next year. Eisboch- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Well, if they get the "censorship doctrine" (fairness doctrine) and keep funding voter fraud through ACORN, it could indeed be a while before republicans are able to speak their point of view... Are you actually stating that reich-wing Republican radio is all that the GOP has to reach its troops? You boys are betting the future of the party on the drug-taking boil known as Rush Limbaugh?- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Oh wait, riech wing, druggie, fundie,,, just thought I would give you a start on your bull**** deflection.. |
How long in the desert?
|
How long in the desert?
On Nov 24, 8:05*pm, Boater wrote:
wrote: On Nov 24, 7:32 pm, "Eisboch" wrote: "Boater" wrote in message ... That was one of the questions asked at a breakfast meeting I attended today with a financial services client and a couple of others across the river in Alexandria. More specifically, how long will the Republicans be wandering in the desert until they can elect a president again? Consensus: *16-20 years, minimum, and maybe never unless the party makes significant changes in its attitudes towards Latinos, blacks, social issues. The financial services guy manages several funds, including a large-cap fund. He thinks many of today's large-cap corporations will never come back, and if there is a market rebound, the smaller corporations will lead the way. His advice to me: stay the hell away from "the market." Oh...the financial times we're in right now...some fund managers are referring to it as the "Bush Recession," and others, the "Bush Depression." You should have asked them if the Red Sox will win the pennant next year. Eisboch- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Well, if they get the "censorship doctrine" (fairness doctrine) and keep funding voter fraud through ACORN, it could indeed be a while before republicans are able to speak their point of view... Are you actually stating that reich-wing Republican radio is all that the GOP has to reach its troops? You boys are betting the future of the party on the drug-taking boil known as Rush Limbaugh?- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - The censorship already started. The bully squads of prosecutors and staties that threatened TV moguls if they ran NRA ads to "froghop" them out of their stations. The Biden and DNC lies about the little station in Florida which dared to ask questions of Biden, calling them "The Nework" and cutting them off. The reporters who dared ask questions or worked for media that was not lock step being thrown off the plane in lieu of more "friendly" reporters.. The Washington Times admitting they did not ask questions because in their own words, they were "in the tank" for Obama..The criminal charges against public officials for illegally going into "Joe the Plumbers' past, just because he has an opposing point of view which is not allowed by the incoming administration..Yeah, try to deflect it to "right wing radio" but that's bull, it's anybody who dares asks |
How long in the desert?
|
How long in the desert?
On Nov 24, 8:23*pm, Boater wrote:
wrote: On Nov 24, 8:05 pm, Boater wrote: wrote: On Nov 24, 7:32 pm, "Eisboch" wrote: "Boater" wrote in message ... That was one of the questions asked at a breakfast meeting I attended today with a financial services client and a couple of others across the river in Alexandria. More specifically, how long will the Republicans be wandering in the desert until they can elect a president again? Consensus: *16-20 years, minimum, and maybe never unless the party makes significant changes in its attitudes towards Latinos, blacks, social issues. The financial services guy manages several funds, including a large-cap fund. He thinks many of today's large-cap corporations will never come back, and if there is a market rebound, the smaller corporations will lead the way. His advice to me: stay the hell away from "the market." Oh...the financial times we're in right now...some fund managers are referring to it as the "Bush Recession," and others, the "Bush Depression." You should have asked them if the Red Sox will win the pennant next year. Eisboch- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Well, if they get the "censorship doctrine" (fairness doctrine) and keep funding voter fraud through ACORN, it could indeed be a while before republicans are able to speak their point of view... Are you actually stating that reich-wing Republican radio is all that the GOP has to reach its troops? You boys are betting the future of the party on the drug-taking boil known as Rush Limbaugh?- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - The censorship already started. The bully squads of prosecutors and staties that threatened TV moguls if they ran NRA ads to "froghop" them out of their stations. The Biden and DNC lies about the little station in Florida which dared to ask questions of Biden, calling them "The Nework" and cutting them off. The reporters who dared ask questions or worked for media that was not lock step being thrown off the plane in lieu of more "friendly" reporters.. The Washington Times admitting they did not ask questions because in their own words, they were "in the tank" for Obama..The criminal charges against public officials for illegally going into "Joe the Plumbers' past, just because he has an opposing point of view which is not allowed by the incoming administration..Yeah, try to deflect it to "right wing radio" but that's bull, it's anybody who dares asks That would be...Joe the Unlicensed Plumber.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - That would be some hard working dude that did not suck union ass... That would be an American citizen who's civil rights were trashed by the Obama machine for simply asking a question.. |
How long in the desert?
|
How long in the desert?
On Nov 24, 8:36*pm, Boater wrote:
wrote: On Nov 24, 8:23 pm, Boater wrote: wrote: That would be...Joe the Unlicensed Plumber.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - That would be some hard working dude that did not suck union ass... That would be an American citizen who's civil rights were trashed by the Obama machine for simply asking a question.. If he were that hard-working a plumber, he'd be doing a lot better than he is. Most of the working union plumbers I know, and I know a lot of them, are making $70,000 and more a year. Joe the non-union unlicensed plumber is making less than half that, if memory serves. He's either not very hard-working or not very skilled, or the unlicensed plumber for whom he works is a lousy businessman. Then there's that whole trashing his civil rights thing, that whole he is an American thing. If "hard working" was a problem, half of the folks who voted Obama would not have... |
How long in the desert?
On Nov 24, 8:39*pm, wrote:
On Nov 24, 8:36*pm, Boater wrote: wrote: On Nov 24, 8:23 pm, Boater wrote: wrote: That would be...Joe the Unlicensed Plumber.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - That would be some hard working dude that did not suck union ass... That would be an American citizen who's civil rights were trashed by the Obama machine for simply asking a question.. If he were that hard-working a plumber, he'd be doing a lot better than he is. Most of the working union plumbers I know, and I know a lot of them, are making $70,000 and more a year. Joe the non-union unlicensed plumber is making less than half that, if memory serves. He's either not very hard-working or not very skilled, or the unlicensed plumber for whom he works is a lousy businessman. Then there's that whole trashing his civil rights thing, that whole he is an American thing. If "hard working" was a problem, half of the folks who voted Obama would not have...- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - I mean, you have never done an honest days work and you voted for him.... |
How long in the desert?
On Mon, 24 Nov 2008 20:36:03 -0500, Boater
wrote: wrote: On Nov 24, 8:23 pm, Boater wrote: wrote: That would be...Joe the Unlicensed Plumber.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - That would be some hard working dude that did not suck union ass... That would be an American citizen who's civil rights were trashed by the Obama machine for simply asking a question.. If he were that hard-working a plumber, he'd be doing a lot better than he is. Most of the working union plumbers I know, and I know a lot of them, are making $70,000 and more a year. Joe the non-union unlicensed plumber is making less than half that, if memory serves. He's either not very hard-working or not very skilled, or the unlicensed plumber for whom he works is a lousy businessman. Speaking of plumbers. Had the union plumber who replaced my Tramco lift system pump out to the house again. Wrote about that before. 47 year old pump replaced. Plumber has seminary training. Anyway the thing started chattering. HAD TO BE A BAD PUMP. Usually only happened when draining warm water from the tub. Very loud. I figured something was off with impeller/casing clearances. I even recorded the noise and played it on the phone for Peter so he could bring a new unit, saving him a trip. It's AT LEAST a 3 hour round trip, and his time ain't cheap. He listens to my recording, and says he'll come out to check it. He say's they never go bad unless they get a rag in them. ABSOLUTELY IMPOSSIBLE! Only one teen in the house now, and nobody here, or anybody I know even, is stupid enough to let a rag go down the toilet. So he drives out and gets to work. We can't duplicate the noise, even with hot tub water. But he hears it's not right, and pulls the pump. PITA. Lays it down on the rags and says "There it is." A F%^KING RAG IS IN THE PUMP. He had to dissasemble the pump head to get what was wrapped around the shaft past the impeller/chopper. Of course everybody denies they did it, and I believe them. No choice anyway. Only thing I can figure is a guest soiled their underwear and took the easy way out. Didn't know everything goes through a pump. Maybe I should put up a sign. Peter worked nearly 4 hours and spent at least 3 hours in bad Chicago/suburb traffic. Charged me $290, apologizing. I just said don't......you're a prince of a guy. --Vic |
How long in the desert?
On Nov 24, 9:04*pm, Vic Smith wrote:
On Mon, 24 Nov 2008 20:36:03 -0500, Boater wrote: wrote: On Nov 24, 8:23 pm, Boater wrote: wrote: That would be...Joe the Unlicensed Plumber.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - That would be some hard working dude that did not suck union ass... That would be an American citizen who's civil rights were trashed by the Obama machine for simply asking a question.. If he were that hard-working a plumber, he'd be doing a lot better than he is. Most of the working union plumbers I know, and I know a lot of them, are making $70,000 and more a year. Joe the non-union unlicensed plumber is making less than half that, if memory serves. He's either not very hard-working or not very skilled, or the unlicensed plumber for whom he works is a lousy businessman. Speaking of plumbers. *Had the union plumber who replaced my Tramco lift system pump out to the house again. *Wrote about that before. 47 year old pump replaced. *Plumber has seminary training. Anyway the thing started chattering. *HAD TO BE A BAD PUMP. Usually only happened when draining warm water from the tub. Very loud. I figured something was off with impeller/casing clearances. I even recorded the noise and played it on the phone for Peter so he could bring a new unit, saving him a trip. It's AT LEAST a 3 hour round trip, and his time ain't cheap. He listens to my recording, and says he'll come out to check it. He say's they never go bad unless they get a rag in them. ABSOLUTELY IMPOSSIBLE! Only one teen in the house now, and nobody here, or anybody I know even, is stupid enough to let a rag go down the toilet. So he drives out and gets to work. *We can't duplicate the noise, even with hot tub water. But he hears it's not right, and pulls the pump. *PITA. Lays it down on the rags and says "There it is." A F%^KING RAG IS IN THE PUMP. He had to dissasemble the pump head to get what was wrapped around the shaft past the impeller/chopper. *Of course everybody denies they did it, and I believe them. No choice anyway. *Only thing I can figure is a guest soiled their underwear and took the easy way out. *Didn't know everything goes through a pump. *Maybe I should put up a sign. Peter worked nearly 4 hours and spent at least 3 hours in bad Chicago/suburb traffic. Charged me $290, apologizing. I just said don't......you're a prince of a guy. --Vic- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Did you trash his civil rights? Did he earn enough to gain the respect of our WAFA?? Hummmmm... |
How long in the desert?
|
How long in the desert?
|
How long in the desert?
On Nov 24, 8:35*pm, Boater wrote:
wrote: On Nov 24, 9:04 pm, Vic Smith wrote: On Mon, 24 Nov 2008 20:36:03 -0500, Boater wrote: wrote: On Nov 24, 8:23 pm, Boater wrote: wrote: That would be...Joe the Unlicensed Plumber.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - That would be some hard working dude that did not suck union ass... That would be an American citizen who's civil rights were trashed by the Obama machine for simply asking a question.. If he were that hard-working a plumber, he'd be doing a lot better than he is. Most of the working union plumbers I know, and I know a lot of them, are making $70,000 and more a year. Joe the non-union unlicensed plumber is making less than half that, if memory serves. He's either not very hard-working or not very skilled, or the unlicensed plumber for whom he works is a lousy businessman. Speaking of plumbers. *Had the union plumber who replaced my Tramco lift system pump out to the house again. *Wrote about that before. 47 year old pump replaced. *Plumber has seminary training. Anyway the thing started chattering. *HAD TO BE A BAD PUMP. Usually only happened when draining warm water from the tub. Very loud. I figured something was off with impeller/casing clearances. I even recorded the noise and played it on the phone for Peter so he could bring a new unit, saving him a trip. It's AT LEAST a 3 hour round trip, and his time ain't cheap. He listens to my recording, and says he'll come out to check it. He say's they never go bad unless they get a rag in them. ABSOLUTELY IMPOSSIBLE! Only one teen in the house now, and nobody here, or anybody I know even, is stupid enough to let a rag go down the toilet. So he drives out and gets to work. *We can't duplicate the noise, even with hot tub water. But he hears it's not right, and pulls the pump. *PITA. Lays it down on the rags and says "There it is." A F%^KING RAG IS IN THE PUMP. He had to dissasemble the pump head to get what was wrapped around the shaft past the impeller/chopper. *Of course everybody denies they did it, and I believe them. No choice anyway. *Only thing I can figure is a guest soiled their underwear and took the easy way out. *Didn't know everything goes through a pump. *Maybe I should put up a sign. Peter worked nearly 4 hours and spent at least 3 hours in bad Chicago/suburb traffic. Charged me $290, apologizing. I just said don't......you're a prince of a guy. --Vic- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Did you trash his civil rights? Did he earn enough to gain the respect of our WAFA?? * * Hummmmm... What are you, a champion for underpaying workers?- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - He is probably not the champion of overpayed loafs. |
How long in the desert?
On Mon, 24 Nov 2008 21:35:01 -0500, Boater wrote:
wrote: On Nov 24, 9:04 pm, Vic Smith wrote: On Mon, 24 Nov 2008 20:36:03 -0500, Boater wrote: wrote: On Nov 24, 8:23 pm, Boater wrote: wrote: That would be...Joe the Unlicensed Plumber.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - That would be some hard working dude that did not suck union ass... That would be an American citizen who's civil rights were trashed by the Obama machine for simply asking a question.. If he were that hard-working a plumber, he'd be doing a lot better than he is. Most of the working union plumbers I know, and I know a lot of them, are making $70,000 and more a year. Joe the non-union unlicensed plumber is making less than half that, if memory serves. He's either not very hard-working or not very skilled, or the unlicensed plumber for whom he works is a lousy businessman. Speaking of plumbers. Had the union plumber who replaced my Tramco lift system pump out to the house again. Wrote about that before. 47 year old pump replaced. Plumber has seminary training. Anyway the thing started chattering. HAD TO BE A BAD PUMP. Usually only happened when draining warm water from the tub. Very loud. I figured something was off with impeller/casing clearances. I even recorded the noise and played it on the phone for Peter so he could bring a new unit, saving him a trip. It's AT LEAST a 3 hour round trip, and his time ain't cheap. He listens to my recording, and says he'll come out to check it. He say's they never go bad unless they get a rag in them. ABSOLUTELY IMPOSSIBLE! Only one teen in the house now, and nobody here, or anybody I know even, is stupid enough to let a rag go down the toilet. So he drives out and gets to work. We can't duplicate the noise, even with hot tub water. But he hears it's not right, and pulls the pump. PITA. Lays it down on the rags and says "There it is." A F%^KING RAG IS IN THE PUMP. He had to dissasemble the pump head to get what was wrapped around the shaft past the impeller/chopper. Of course everybody denies they did it, and I believe them. No choice anyway. Only thing I can figure is a guest soiled their underwear and took the easy way out. Didn't know everything goes through a pump. Maybe I should put up a sign. Peter worked nearly 4 hours and spent at least 3 hours in bad Chicago/suburb traffic. Charged me $290, apologizing. I just said don't......you're a prince of a guy. --Vic- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Did you trash his civil rights? Did he earn enough to gain the respect of our WAFA?? Hummmmm... What are you, a champion for underpaying workers? Harry, your line of reasoning (?) in this thread explains a lot. Scary. -- A Harry Krause truism: "It's not a *baby* kicking, beautiful bride, it's just a fetus!" |
How long in the desert?
Boater wrote:
JohnH wrote: On Mon, 24 Nov 2008 14:51:17 -0500, Boater wrote: That was one of the questions asked at a breakfast meeting I attended today with a financial services client and a couple of others across the river in Alexandria. More specifically, how long will the Republicans be wandering in the desert until they can elect a president again? Consensus: 16-20 years, minimum, and maybe never unless the party makes significant changes in its attitudes towards Latinos, blacks, social issues. The financial services guy manages several funds, including a large-cap fund. He thinks many of today's large-cap corporations will never come back, and if there is a market rebound, the smaller corporations will lead the way. His advice to me: stay the hell away from "the market." Oh...the financial times we're in right now...some fund managers are referring to it as the "Bush Recession," and others, the "Bush Depression." Sounds like an equally represented group of liberals and conservatives to me. Harry, are you over your rancor yet? Rancor? Hehehe. Eat schitt and die. Soon. BTW, I had a nice meeting in the coffee shop at the Hotel Monaco in your fair city. Weird lobby decor, though. I resisted the urge to drive over to your place and drop off a doggy bag. Nice, wishing John dead after begging for sympathy for your dead cat. You are amazing, WAFA. |
How long in the desert?
"D K" wrote in message ... Boater wrote: JohnH wrote: On Mon, 24 Nov 2008 14:51:17 -0500, Boater wrote: That was one of the questions asked at a breakfast meeting I attended today with a financial services client and a couple of others across the river in Alexandria. More specifically, how long will the Republicans be wandering in the desert until they can elect a president again? Consensus: 16-20 years, minimum, and maybe never unless the party makes significant changes in its attitudes towards Latinos, blacks, social issues. The financial services guy manages several funds, including a large-cap fund. He thinks many of today's large-cap corporations will never come back, and if there is a market rebound, the smaller corporations will lead the way. His advice to me: stay the hell away from "the market." Oh...the financial times we're in right now...some fund managers are referring to it as the "Bush Recession," and others, the "Bush Depression." Sounds like an equally represented group of liberals and conservatives to me. Harry, are you over your rancor yet? Rancor? Hehehe. Eat schitt and die. Soon. BTW, I had a nice meeting in the coffee shop at the Hotel Monaco in your fair city. Weird lobby decor, though. I resisted the urge to drive over to your place and drop off a doggy bag. Nice, wishing John dead after begging for sympathy for your dead cat. You are amazing, WAFA. Why don't you go scare the crap out of teenage girls again, Freddy. You don't serve any useful purpose here. |
How long in the desert?
Don White wrote:
"D K" wrote in message ... Boater wrote: JohnH wrote: On Mon, 24 Nov 2008 14:51:17 -0500, Boater wrote: That was one of the questions asked at a breakfast meeting I attended today with a financial services client and a couple of others across the river in Alexandria. More specifically, how long will the Republicans be wandering in the desert until they can elect a president again? Consensus: 16-20 years, minimum, and maybe never unless the party makes significant changes in its attitudes towards Latinos, blacks, social issues. The financial services guy manages several funds, including a large-cap fund. He thinks many of today's large-cap corporations will never come back, and if there is a market rebound, the smaller corporations will lead the way. His advice to me: stay the hell away from "the market." Oh...the financial times we're in right now...some fund managers are referring to it as the "Bush Recession," and others, the "Bush Depression." Sounds like an equally represented group of liberals and conservatives to me. Harry, are you over your rancor yet? Rancor? Hehehe. Eat schitt and die. Soon. BTW, I had a nice meeting in the coffee shop at the Hotel Monaco in your fair city. Weird lobby decor, though. I resisted the urge to drive over to your place and drop off a doggy bag. Nice, wishing John dead after begging for sympathy for your dead cat. You are amazing, WAFA. Why don't you go scare the crap out of teenage girls again, Freddy. You don't serve any useful purpose here. What the hell are you talking about, dummy? Is this some Simpson's episode again? STFU. |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:56 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com