| Keith nuttle |
November 22nd 08 04:48 PM |
Geithner, Clinton, Richardson in Obama's Cabinet
Boater wrote:
BAR wrote:
Boater wrote:
BAR wrote:
Boater wrote:
BAR wrote:
wrote:
On Sat, 22 Nov 2008 07:11:35 -0500, Eisboch wrote:
I don't disagree, but this transition period is not typical. The
situation requires an indication of intent now, not later, as
demonstrated by the reaction on Wall Street when the news of his
nominations to be made on Monday were leaked.
Personally, I find it interesting that all these leaks are now
coming from a very disciplined and tight lipped campaign. I'm
guessing he's floating names for a response. The timing on
Geithner's "leak" was brilliant.
The Obama is being handled by the Clintons.
snerk
The American voters "handled" the Republicans this time, just as
they should be handled.
The Republicans were punished.
Your assertions really are hysterically funny. Obama, who was not
my first choice for nominee, handily outsmarted the Clintons during
the primaries, and tied the Republicans up in knots during the
general election, turning a handful of red states blue.
Obama only got the nomination because of his early wins in the
smaller states. And, because Hillary did not take him seriously enough.
I was delighted for the opportunity to vote for Obama on election
day, not only because I thought him by far the best candidate for
office, but because I just knew he would drive the social
conservative simpies nuts.
Both Obama and McCain provided poor choices on election day.
Your brand of social conservatism will never again elect a president
of the United States.
If the country turns towards socialism it is no longer the United
States of America, a country based upon personal liberty, private
property and freedom from the tyranny of government.
On another, equally happy note, I was pleased as punch the GOP
resurrected Saul Alinsky. Saul would have been tickled. I know that,
first-hand. :)
We, collectively, have become lazy and envious of those who have
worked hard. Socialism fails under the weight of its vast majority of
unproductive and under-productive members. Social Security is a prime
example of a Socialist program that is failing and will soon crush
those few who are productive supporting those who are not productive.
Why do those who work owe those who don't work anything at all?
Don't slam the door on your way out of the country.
The social security system was self funded until the democrats diverted
the funds to other social welfare programs. It use to be called social
security insurance because it was self funded.
|
