Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#7
![]()
posted to rec.boats.electronics
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
So I'll go back to my guess that the application layer is the same but the
underlying layers (transport to physical) have been altered to NMEA 2000. Incorrect. The bridge cable is passive. The NG cabling, it appears, just has extra wiring to accomodate the older SeaTalk network. I'm guessing they did this to allow bringing older SeaTalk gear into the network without having to run a lot of additional cabling. That is, bring a line off an older SeaTalk-based transducer and tee it into a new NG network. Leaves them an opening to attaching existing gear (sensors, gauges and the like) to the new network. So if you pulled a new NG 'backbone' network you would be able to connect any older gear onto the cable without keeping the old network. It would not have made much economic sense to go with the NMEA2k protocol stack and not take advantage of the economies of scale offered by standards-based chipsets. -Bill Kearney |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Conclusion [and further developments WRT KISS wind generation] (was) Water Heater experience sought | Boat Building | |||
Conclusion [and further developments WRT KISS wind generation] (was) Water Heater experience sought | Cruising | |||
Power generation on an outboard motor | Cruising |