Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#5
![]()
posted to rec.boats.electronics
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "frank1492" wrote in message ... This seems like a good time to interject my problem. I had originally posted a thread explaining that my LX-201 Datamarine depth finder wouldn't work. The problem was traced to a faulty thru-hull transducer. Although I considered many solution alternatives (with the help of the fine folk on this group) I settled on trying an Airmar P79 in-hull because they told me it would be compatible with the LX-201. Also, I preferred not to mess with the old thru-hull as it needed to be pulled from the bottom and appeared to be epoxyed in place. Initial tests have shown that the Airmar will work well as it will be used on a non-cored Grady White with a solid hull thickness of less than one inch. The problem has been the mounting of the transducer. Airmar uses a bottomless base (ring) with a flange that is secured to the inside of the hull with adhesive. The base is then filled with either mineral oil or propylene glycol (their instructions), and the transducer snaps on over that such that its bottom face "floats" on the liquid. Obviously whatever adhesive is used must make a permanent seal between the hull and the base flange as the base itself has no bottom. Here is the problem. Airmar specifically states that epoxy, or the previously recommended Boatlife LIfe Seal or 3M 4200 are *not* to be used. Only GE Silicone II is allowed! With an area perfectly cleaned with 409 (the area has a gloss), I have tried to mount the base three times, each with many hours of cure time. Each time when I have added the glycol, it leaks out after a few seconds as if it were reacting with the silicone. When the base is removed, the silicone on the flange is a sticky mess. It really doesn't make sense to me that silicone would work at all in this application. So why not use epoxy? Is it just that it would be permanent and if the transducer base had to be moved or removed you couldnt get it off? Surely Airmar sells replacement bases. (I will check tomorrow.) Your counsel is much appreciated. Am I just doing something wrong in applying the Silicone II? (Otherwise known as "Kitchen and Bath.") Or am I correct that this is a bad idea for a permanent installation and epoxy should be used? Thank you. Frank On 2 Apr 2006 21:53:32 -0700, "DPFresh" wrote: Hello all, so as oppossed to drilling a hole in my hull for a depth finder sensor, I should be able to set it up inside the hull as long as the sensor is in some type of liquid right? IT will be able to tell depths through the fiberglass hull right? Thanks, David If you are going to contact Airmar regarding the availability of a replacement base why don't you ask them why you can't use epoxy or 4200? I would think 4200 would glue this down with no problem. Silicone is a sealer, not an adhesive. I don't think it produces a very strong bond and consequently any impacts on the base are likely to break the seal. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Signet heel angle sensor wanted | Electronics | |||
Fishing Kayak fish finder reviews | General | |||
Which fluxgate compass and rudder sensor for Raymarine model 100 autopilot | Electronics | |||
main tank oil level sensor | General | |||
Fram C3P depth filter 2 microns filtration | General |