Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#25
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article , chuck
wrote: Hello Bruce, You must be a lawyer! I suspect that Doug was not necessarily asking whether his older M710 is covered by the newer Type Acceptance Certificate. I think he was asking whether his older, open M710 is Type Accepted under *any* certificate. This gets all the more interesting since I believe Icom supplied the open M710s as an option and seemed to claim they were type-accepted. It is true that third parties and owners also opened some M710s and it is an entirely different question whether that invalidated the type acceptance. Let's stick with the M710s that Icom sold as open first. I understand your assertion that IF the early M710s were not type-accepted in an open version, THEN the type acceptance could be invalidated even if Icom opened them itself. What has NOT been established is that there was in fact no type acceptance of the early open versions. Can any of your contacts shed any light on that question? Thanks! Chuck Nope, not a Lawyer. I was, however, an FCC Field Agent for a number of years. I also have been in the Marine Electronics Field for over 35 years, in various capacities. I am now retired, and just do Communications Consulting. I do know a bunch of Communications Lawyers, however....... Bruce in alaska -- add a 2 before @ |