| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#25
|
|||
|
|||
|
That's an unreasonable expectation to assume the USCG would hear a small
boat between Midway and Japan on HF, which is far from our area of responsibilty. You're on your own out in waters like that, and 2182 or 4125 are for 20-200 mile coverage. Higher frequencies as you used to call someone nearer to your locaton, are certainly better for long haul comms. Why is it that USCG "monitored" frequencies are not reliable at these distances, but ham frequencies are pretty reliable. 4125 is just a bit above the 80m ham band. I can talk to Australia, Africa, Europe and Asia fairly reliably. I think the bottom line is that for whatever reason, the USCG and USCGA do not do a very good job of monitoring the frequencies that they claim to. Hams are always on the air somewhere, getting a ham license is the best insurance for one's safety. Doug, k3qt s/v Callista |