Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Yme Bosma" wrote in message
om... Hi there, It's been discussed in this forum before, but over at Ocean Navigator they have published an article that states the NMEA 2000 standard is 'picking up steam'. Subscription is required, so here some quotes from the article: http://www.panbo.com/yae/archives/we...22.html#000356 I'm curious to know what you all think of this standard and wether it's really gaining any traction. Or do you already see any rival (non-proprietary) 'standards'/alternatives emerging? Based on CAN, it is a robust standard, but requires quite some protocol overhead since CAN can only transmit small datapackets. My biggest problem is the cost involved. To get your first product on the market, you have to buy the standard documents and test suites and apply for a vendor- and product ID. This will cost $10,500 total, quite a hurdle for small manufacturers. My 'all time favourite' would be a marriage between NMEA-0813 and SeaTalk and some other features. Use a CAN bus driver, (passive '1' level/active '0' level), use the same text-based NMEA type sentences (easy to debug), use the collision detect feature of SeaTalk and increase the speed to a few hundred kbit/second. And when need be, switch to a binary variant of NMEA. Meindert |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Wireless 802.11 NMEA server | Electronics | |||
Notes on short SSB antennas, for Larry | Cruising | |||
SSB Ground systems | Electronics | |||
NMEA mutiplexer | Electronics |