![]() |
|
Bluetooth enabled NMEA multiplexers
"Yme Bosma" wrote in message
m... "Meindert Sprang" wrote in message ... Hi all, Our Bluetooth enabled multiplexers have finally seen the light. See www.shipmodul.com for more details. Meindert Definitely an interesting product, wrote some thoughts about it on my weblog, www.panbo.com/yae. How do you see Zigbee (www.zigbee.org) and NMEA 2000 fitting into this? Will they obsolete your products? I don't think so. Not for the near future. Like I mentioned in my other post, NMEA2000 is quite costly. It is just too darn simple to put a simple serial interface on a device. As for ZigBee, I'll have to investigate that one. It is of course not such a widespread standard as Bluetooth, but it has it merits. But I'll always have my doubt about equipping every sensor with a wireless link. As long as you have to power something with a wire, you can also transport data over that wire, eliminating the need for wireless. Regards, Meindert |
Bluetooth enabled NMEA multiplexers
"Meindert Sprang" wrote in message ...
"Yme Bosma" wrote in message m... "Meindert Sprang" wrote in message ... Hi all, Our Bluetooth enabled multiplexers have finally seen the light. See www.shipmodul.com for more details. Meindert Definitely an interesting product, wrote some thoughts about it on my weblog, www.panbo.com/yae. How do you see Zigbee (www.zigbee.org) and NMEA 2000 fitting into this? Will they obsolete your products? I don't think so. Not for the near future. Like I mentioned in my other post, NMEA2000 is quite costly. It is just too darn simple to put a simple serial interface on a device. As for ZigBee, I'll have to investigate that one. It is of course not such a widespread standard as Bluetooth, but it has it merits. But I'll always have my doubt about equipping every sensor with a wireless link. As long as you have to power something with a wire, you can also transport data over that wire, eliminating the need for wireless. Regards, Meindert Yes, I understand that last point, but then again, Zigbee was developed with exactly that requirement in mind. It's extremely efficient with power so that it can be used for a long time running on a battery, or on a few solar cells. This would probably not be feasible with Bluetooth. Although they are now developing a low-powered version of Bluetooth to deal with this problem... Yme http://www.panbo.com/yae/ |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:07 AM. |
|
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com