![]() |
Parallelling fuel pumps
"Doug Dotson" wrote in
: Glenn, That is pretty much what I was figuring on other than the check valves. Not sure I want a center off switch though. I would prefer that one or the other be on at all times. I'm also considering putting an hours-meter on each so that I can balance the use. Doug s/v Callista I'll also vote for a manual valve on both in parallel...... We're in a seaway, big waves. The pump goes into failure mode, we switch on the backup and are back in business. Wouldn't it be good if we could isolate the failed pump for repairs, remove/replace or tear it down for that new diaphram while the other pump has the load and the first mate or autopilot is driving? Sure would be nice to be able to get that failed pump offline while the boat's still underway for repairs. Can't do that on the series pumps without some crazy plumbing bypasses and lots of valves.... Larry W4CSC |
Parallelling fuel pumps
"Doug Dotson" wrote in
: I want to be able to switch pumps with the flick of a switch not crawling into the engine compartment to switch valves. Doug s/v Callista Engine compartments with dead engines can get ugly in 12' waves beating against the hull in a foundering boat. I'm with Doug. I want it automated as it can get with all the isolation valves open and a pump switch at the helm. Larry W4CSC |
Parallelling fuel pumps
"Doug Dotson" wrote in
: I want to be able to switch pumps with the flick of a switch not crawling into the engine compartment to switch valves. Doug s/v Callista Engine compartments with dead engines can get ugly in 12' waves beating against the hull in a foundering boat. I'm with Doug. I want it automated as it can get with all the isolation valves open and a pump switch at the helm. Larry W4CSC |
Parallelling fuel pumps
"Doug Dotson" wrote in
: So perhaps a valve on both ends plus a check valve or maybe two check valves. This is getting too complicated to be worth it. Doug s/v Callista As the "worst case scenarios" become more absurd, we'll have a full time engineer in the engine room, 24/7, on 3 shifts. The kids will have to stay home as we need their berths for the engineers and the engineering supervisor. Larry W4CSC |
Parallelling fuel pumps
"Doug Dotson" wrote in
: So perhaps a valve on both ends plus a check valve or maybe two check valves. This is getting too complicated to be worth it. Doug s/v Callista As the "worst case scenarios" become more absurd, we'll have a full time engineer in the engine room, 24/7, on 3 shifts. The kids will have to stay home as we need their berths for the engineers and the engineering supervisor. Larry W4CSC |
Parallelling fuel pumps
Agreed!
"Larry W4CSC" wrote in message ... "Doug Dotson" wrote in : Glenn, That is pretty much what I was figuring on other than the check valves. Not sure I want a center off switch though. I would prefer that one or the other be on at all times. I'm also considering putting an hours-meter on each so that I can balance the use. Doug s/v Callista I'll also vote for a manual valve on both in parallel...... We're in a seaway, big waves. The pump goes into failure mode, we switch on the backup and are back in business. Wouldn't it be good if we could isolate the failed pump for repairs, remove/replace or tear it down for that new diaphram while the other pump has the load and the first mate or autopilot is driving? Sure would be nice to be able to get that failed pump offline while the boat's still underway for repairs. Can't do that on the series pumps without some crazy plumbing bypasses and lots of valves.... Larry W4CSC |
Parallelling fuel pumps
Agreed!
"Larry W4CSC" wrote in message ... "Doug Dotson" wrote in : Glenn, That is pretty much what I was figuring on other than the check valves. Not sure I want a center off switch though. I would prefer that one or the other be on at all times. I'm also considering putting an hours-meter on each so that I can balance the use. Doug s/v Callista I'll also vote for a manual valve on both in parallel...... We're in a seaway, big waves. The pump goes into failure mode, we switch on the backup and are back in business. Wouldn't it be good if we could isolate the failed pump for repairs, remove/replace or tear it down for that new diaphram while the other pump has the load and the first mate or autopilot is driving? Sure would be nice to be able to get that failed pump offline while the boat's still underway for repairs. Can't do that on the series pumps without some crazy plumbing bypasses and lots of valves.... Larry W4CSC |
Parallelling fuel pumps
Unfortunately, I have to mount mine in the engine compartment.
Maybe I'll give it a blast of T9 to keep it pretty. Doug s/v Callista "Marc" wrote in message ... I think it has to do with the integrity of the protective shell and corporate liability. I don't know why one is required. Obviously they are the same pumps. Do you think it has something to do with mounting the pump in the engine compartment.? CG Reg? Corrosion issues?. In any event, my pump is located outside the engine compartment and I see no reason not to remove the shell. On Tue, 13 Apr 2004 12:18:06 -0400, "Doug Dotson" wrote: Why do you think Walbro is lying about this? Doug s/v Callista "Marc" wrote in message .. . You got the same ones as we have,Doug. Yes, you have to bend the mounting bracket drastically. Pry off the end caps and the clam shell protection comes apart, exposing the pump. Remove three(?) screws on the bottom plate to expose the filter. http://www.autoperformanceengineerin...6000_pump.html On Tue, 13 Apr 2004 11:48:16 -0400, "Doug Dotson" wrote: It appears these do not. Just to remove the mounting bracket one would have to bend it out of shape quite drastically. I looked closely at the brass caps top and bottom and it does appear that they may be able to be pryed off. But in any case the instructions say the filters are not servicable and there are no spares or instructions for servicing provided. Doug s/v Callista "Rich Hampel" wrote in message ... Must be a 'new' version as all my Walbro pumps have accessible/removalbe/cleanable protection screens/strainer wire. In article , Doug Dotson wrote: Both my WALBRO pumps came with no replacement filters. A large box in bold print in the instructions states the following: " SERVICE DATA The Walbro Marine Electronic Pump incorporates two (2) built-in filters, one for filtering fine particles and the other (a magnet) for trapping metalic particles. Due to the construction of the protective outer shell, these filters cannot be serviced." The plastic outer shell appears to be glued together. Perhaps this is a newer or different model than the one you have. Doug s/v Callista : "Marc" wrote in message ... The internal filter on the Walbro can be cleaned. In fact, they supply a spare with the pump. Taking the pump apart is a little fussy in an emergency situation. I am a little concerned to find out that a pump failure may result in a blocked fuel supply due to the wobble plate. Right now, I have the Walbro in line with my mechanical pump. On Mon, 12 Apr 2004 17:55:34 -0400, "Doug Dotson" wrote: I seem to recall from the WALBRO docs that the pump is not field servicable. Specifically, it states that the internal filters cannot be changed. Doug s/v Callista "Kelton Joyner" wrote in message . .. Unless you have isolation valves to allow servicing of a parallel pump, series works just as well for backup. fuel wil flow through the unpowered pump. Kelton W4IND s/v Isle Escape Larry W4CSC wrote: (Steven Shelikoff) wrote in : That begs the question why are you going to put two pumps in parallel if you only want to run one at a time? Steve Backup? Larry W4CSC |
Parallelling fuel pumps
Unfortunately, I have to mount mine in the engine compartment.
Maybe I'll give it a blast of T9 to keep it pretty. Doug s/v Callista "Marc" wrote in message ... I think it has to do with the integrity of the protective shell and corporate liability. I don't know why one is required. Obviously they are the same pumps. Do you think it has something to do with mounting the pump in the engine compartment.? CG Reg? Corrosion issues?. In any event, my pump is located outside the engine compartment and I see no reason not to remove the shell. On Tue, 13 Apr 2004 12:18:06 -0400, "Doug Dotson" wrote: Why do you think Walbro is lying about this? Doug s/v Callista "Marc" wrote in message .. . You got the same ones as we have,Doug. Yes, you have to bend the mounting bracket drastically. Pry off the end caps and the clam shell protection comes apart, exposing the pump. Remove three(?) screws on the bottom plate to expose the filter. http://www.autoperformanceengineerin...6000_pump.html On Tue, 13 Apr 2004 11:48:16 -0400, "Doug Dotson" wrote: It appears these do not. Just to remove the mounting bracket one would have to bend it out of shape quite drastically. I looked closely at the brass caps top and bottom and it does appear that they may be able to be pryed off. But in any case the instructions say the filters are not servicable and there are no spares or instructions for servicing provided. Doug s/v Callista "Rich Hampel" wrote in message ... Must be a 'new' version as all my Walbro pumps have accessible/removalbe/cleanable protection screens/strainer wire. In article , Doug Dotson wrote: Both my WALBRO pumps came with no replacement filters. A large box in bold print in the instructions states the following: " SERVICE DATA The Walbro Marine Electronic Pump incorporates two (2) built-in filters, one for filtering fine particles and the other (a magnet) for trapping metalic particles. Due to the construction of the protective outer shell, these filters cannot be serviced." The plastic outer shell appears to be glued together. Perhaps this is a newer or different model than the one you have. Doug s/v Callista : "Marc" wrote in message ... The internal filter on the Walbro can be cleaned. In fact, they supply a spare with the pump. Taking the pump apart is a little fussy in an emergency situation. I am a little concerned to find out that a pump failure may result in a blocked fuel supply due to the wobble plate. Right now, I have the Walbro in line with my mechanical pump. On Mon, 12 Apr 2004 17:55:34 -0400, "Doug Dotson" wrote: I seem to recall from the WALBRO docs that the pump is not field servicable. Specifically, it states that the internal filters cannot be changed. Doug s/v Callista "Kelton Joyner" wrote in message . .. Unless you have isolation valves to allow servicing of a parallel pump, series works just as well for backup. fuel wil flow through the unpowered pump. Kelton W4IND s/v Isle Escape Larry W4CSC wrote: (Steven Shelikoff) wrote in : That begs the question why are you going to put two pumps in parallel if you only want to run one at a time? Steve Backup? Larry W4CSC |
Parallelling fuel pumps
Agreed again! Switching to the backup pump quickly is a must.
Then I can crawl into the engine room and switch valves to service the failed pump at my leasure. I'm also installing a vacuum gauge in a location viewable in the pilothouse. Hour meter on each pump allows me to manage the use of each pump. Doug s/v Callista "Larry W4CSC" wrote in message ... "Doug Dotson" wrote in : I want to be able to switch pumps with the flick of a switch not crawling into the engine compartment to switch valves. Doug s/v Callista Engine compartments with dead engines can get ugly in 12' waves beating against the hull in a foundering boat. I'm with Doug. I want it automated as it can get with all the isolation valves open and a pump switch at the helm. Larry W4CSC |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:24 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com