Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
internal/external ballast
I frequently hear the supposed virtues of external ballast when
somebody hits a rock and says it absorbed the impact so they got no water in the boat. Does this make sense? Most internal ballast is encapsulated so an impact to it would not let in any water. I also hear horror stories about external ballast keels on older boats coming loose resulting in very expensive reapirs or drilling into thick lead to install new keel bolts. So, why is external ballast supposedly better? |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Am I chasing my tail?? | Boat Building | |||
Putting ballast to work | Cruising | |||
Bilge Pump Switch | General | |||
Catalina 250 | Cruising | |||
Adding lead ballast | Boat Building |