Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]()
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#2
![]()
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jul 3, 8:47*am, "Kapt Krunch" wrote:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zk1o6...eature=related Lets start with the not so obvious Look at the helm's sun glasses. They should be a yellow-amber color to increase contrast. The dark lense he has simply darkens his view and deminshes contrast. Along with his very stylish clothing choices he screams, "I am more concerned with style and looking good than function. Right there I would place that guy in with all the rest of the fu fu wanna look good girly men. When my sole means of motor transportaiton was a Norton motorcycle we had a saying, "if it dont go crome it" That is what the helm has accomplised. You wanna be impotant ya gotta look impotant. 2 cant tell by the video quality but look at the dark line on the horrizon. appears to be a "squall line" or front conditions. What comes along with that condition? 3 sailing with seas on the STB quarter. 4 speed 10.8+ knots 5 at least the main was reefed 6 notice the sea conditions were not bad. infact, I would rate the Beaufort Sea State as: a rather nice day for sailing. that is, no breaking seas. 7 notice the constant helm corrections. this suggests a rather squrrley boat... given the condition. probably has a fin keel and a huge hung rudder. both designed for nimble turning ![]() 8 the planets aligne: an expected, larger than normal wave shows up, the boat is all ready rounding up because of all of the above (1-7), got on top of the wave and caught the wind in the main that finished the job the helm put together. The sun glasses are an accurate predictor of this event........... Bob |
#3
![]()
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Bob" wrote in message ... On Jul 3, 8:47 am, "Kapt Krunch" wrote: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zk1o6...eature=related Lets start with the not so obvious Look at the helm's sun glasses. They should be a yellow-amber color to increase contrast. The dark lense he has simply darkens his view and deminshes contrast. Along with his very stylish clothing choices he screams, "I am more concerned with style and looking good than function. Right there I would place that guy in with all the rest of the fu fu wanna look good girly men. When my sole means of motor transportaiton was a Norton motorcycle we had a saying, "if it dont go crome it" That is what the helm has accomplised. You wanna be impotant ya gotta look impotant. 2 cant tell by the video quality but look at the dark line on the horrizon. appears to be a "squall line" or front conditions. What comes along with that condition? 3 sailing with seas on the STB quarter. 4 speed 10.8+ knots 5 at least the main was reefed 6 notice the sea conditions were not bad. infact, I would rate the Beaufort Sea State as: a rather nice day for sailing. that is, no breaking seas. 7 notice the constant helm corrections. this suggests a rather squrrley boat... given the condition. probably has a fin keel and a huge hung rudder. both designed for nimble turning ![]() 8 the planets aligne: an expected, larger than normal wave shows up, the boat is all ready rounding up because of all of the above (1-7), got on top of the wave and caught the wind in the main that finished the job the helm put together. The sun glasses are an accurate predictor of this event........... Bob You are a genius! |
#4
![]()
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jul 3, 10:34*am, "Kapt Krunch" wrote:
Bob You are a genius! Thank you..... thank you very much. Senario No.2 The weight in the boat is all forward: chain in bow, holding tank full of ****, water tanks 1/2 full with lots of free surface etc. When on top of the wave given the weight distribution its a fast round up and beam to the sea.......... Eeeek ! Either way, a dead give-a-way is the constant helm corrections. somthing aint right. Bob |
#5
![]()
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Bob" wrote in message ... Either way, a dead give-a-way is the constant helm corrections. somthing aint right. Bob What ain't right is your absurd assumptions about the constant helm corrections. There is no modern, high performance sailboat with fin keel/spade rudder combo that doesn't need constant helm corrections when running with the seas on or abaft the quarter. It's the nature of the beast. Duh! If there is anything physically wrong with that boat it's the gear ratio of the wheel and the wheel itself. It needs to be rotated way too far to effect any sort of meaningful course change. That broach would not have happened with a tiller-steered vessel. A helmsman sitting sideways in the boat doesn't have his back to weather like that fool has and a tiller moves the rudder a significant amount instantaneously with great feedback. Now, this brings up the even greater folly of a pilot house where the helmsman is even more isolated from the elements. Get back to basics for safe and successful sailing. Haven't any of you learned anything from the unnecessary loss of the "Red Cloud?" Wilbur Hubbard |
#6
![]()
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jul 3, 3:14*pm, "Wilbur Hubbard"
wrote: "Bob" wrote in message Either way, a dead give-a-way is the constant helm corrections. somthing aint right. Bob What ain't right is your absurd assumptions about the constant helm corrections. There is no modern, high performance sailboat with fin keel/spade rudder combo that doesn't need constant helm corrections when running with the seas on or abaft the quarter. It's the nature of the beast. Duh! Wilbur Hubbard two comments Wilbur: 1, I agree the boat type is absurd and simply not a safe designe for most people. still a helm should not have to drive a boat that much. It an indacation somthin aint ballanced right. my boat handled a bit that way too. but i had 300+ pounds of chain and a 45lb anchor in the bow....... 2., I belive the correct tem is simply "quarter". No other language is needed to give that area on a vessel meaning. but your use may be a local dialect. I other words, locate the "quarters" on a vessel. But i got your idea. those kind of boats are dangerous in an amature's hands. bob |
#7
![]()
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Kapt Krunch" wrote in message ... http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zk1o6...eature=related What the helmsman did wrong is he broached. From the direction of the waves it appears he was broad reaching. Yet he never even bothered looking behind to check for rogue or misdirected waves. Instead he was posing for the camera trying to look cool. In other words imagining how great he was going to look on video and not paying attention to the real job at hand. When one particularly large wave hit him on the quarter it slewed the boat around. He should have been paying attention to the waves approaching on the quarter. All he would have to have done is steered so as to have the wave approach directly from astern. Dummy! Wilbur Hubbard |
#8
![]()
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 2008-07-03 12:47:10 -0400, "Kapt Krunch" said:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zk1o6...eature=related Gawd! He was looking *down* at the instruments, sailing *them* not the boat! -- Jere Lull Xan-à-Deux -- Tanzer 28 #4 out of Tolchester, MD Xan's pages: http://web.mac.com/jerelull/iWeb/Xan/ Our BVI trips & tips: http://homepage.mac.com/jerelull/BVI/ |
#9
![]()
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 08 Jul 2008 04:41:48 GMT, in message
2008070800414850073-jerelull@maccom Jere Lull wrote: On 2008-07-03 12:47:10 -0400, "Kapt Krunch" said: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zk1o6...eature=related Gawd! He was looking *down* at the instruments, sailing *them* not the boat! I like my instruments and find them useful in making the boat perform. I don't know what he was looking at, but we saw that most of the instruments were mounted forward where he could see them without losing the larger forward view. Still, he needed to be looking over his shoulder and setting the rudder before it loaded up. That late response did no good and probably ate some life out of the rudder bearings. I also wonder why the main trimmer wasn't dumping the main when rudder control was lost. Maybe s/he was the one with the camera. The amount of steering action didn't look odd to me, even for a fairly conservative boat with a keel aspect ratio of 1. It might have been easier to steer with less lift surface up high and more weight at the bottom. Other than that, it looked like a great downhill ride, although the boat looked like it should be surfing faster than 10 in those conditions. Mind you, my perspective is biased towards going fast and spinning out now and then. Ryk |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Usenet downloads: 1943 USS Cero Helmsman.jpg 239967 bytes | Tall Ship Photos | |||
Australian yacht hit by 12 meter wave - helmsman lost | General | |||
Australian yacht hit by 12 meter wave - helmsman lost | Cruising | |||
Wrong? | ASA | |||
What's wrong with you? | ASA |