Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Matt/Meribeth Pedersen wrote:
I think the Morgan 34 (and the CCA era M33, not the Out Island) are pretty good boats. The Tartan has a nice reputation but the centerboard doesn't kick up if you run aground and it can be hard to repair the mechanism if you ground hard and bend something. The Morgan 34 CB doesn't kick up either, but if you do break something it is relatively easy to fix since it's a cable mechanism. You might get arguments from owners of the Ericson 35 that they are just as good as the Ranger, but I don't have the heavy air miles on one to confirm the opinion ( and I'm thinking of the Bruce King designed Mark II version here). Pretty comparable boats in many ways, but IMHO the Ranger is a little better looking and the Ericson is better built. The Ranger is more likely to be found at the lower end of the price range, too (not a judgement on them). As far a centerboard boats go, for a trip in the Gulf/Florida/Bahamas I think it's almost a requirement. Not so much for some of the Caribbean. The big disadvantage is of course the added maintenence of the board and it's raising/lowering mechanism. Sure the centerboard is a maintenance item, and some are easier & more reliable than others. IMHO it is well worth the added capability... when we talk about cruising with people who have deep draft boats, they usually say "We can go anywhere we want" dismissively... but then it turns out that there is a long long list of nice places that they "don't want" to go... I also consider it a safety issue, in that you have more options with less draft. ... That and they can clunk around in the slot in a seaway, which I always found disconcerting. That can be fixed relatively easily, depending on the board design. ... They do help you go to windward if your sails are up to it, but there are many people who glass the board in place and forget about sailing close winded. I wouldn't, but then I hate sailing boats that don't go to weather well. Agreed. Getting trapped on a lee shore is guaranteed bad day. Of course, seaworthiness is always an issue with centerboard boats. Deep keels have more favorable wieght distribution for resisting and recovery from capsize. A competent, well prepared crew should be able to make a centerboarder work for the type of trip your thinking of though. It wouldn't be my choice for a circumnavigation, but would be for for Gulf cruising. The big issue I see here is the Center of Gravity (specifically, where it is located vertically) and it's impact on the Limit of Positive Stability. It's a lot easier to get a good LPOS if you can put the ballast nice and low. But the old fashioned centerboarders, somewhat narrow by modern standards, with strong sheer and narrow sterns, can have a better LPOS in practice than a modern boat with high sides and wide transom. That's in theory... in practice, when this is an issue, it's more important to make sure you don't get conked in the head by a flying soup can... not on most people's list of seaworthiness issues ![]() AFter the Fastnet storm of 79, there was a lot of research done on characteristics that help or hinder capsize. One fallout of that was a capsize screen formula. It is Beam (feet) divided by displacement^.3333 (displacement to the 1/3 power, displacement in cubic feet). The result of this formula should be a value less than 2. I have always argued that the formula is a little simplistic because it doesn't take into account ballast placement (you could have 4000 pounds of lead at the top of the mast and the formula would say you have a seaworthy boat). However, for the boats under discussion it should give good results. Yes, the point of the capsize screen formula (or ratio) is to compare similar boats... not to scale seaworthiness. In the absence of more detailed data, the CSR and the ballast/disp ratio can tell a lot about a boats hardiness for rough weather. And there are so many other seaworthiness considerations... the rig, the hatches, the stowage, etc etc... that it's easy to give this too much weight. BTW I noticed that nobody has yet mentioned "small cockpits" or recommended double enders... Fresh Breezes- Doug King |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Water systems on my boat - need suggestions, please. | Boat Building | |||
Harry's lobster boat? | General | |||
Where to find ramp stories? | General | |||
Fresh Water Tank | Cruising | |||
Hot Water Dispenser | Cruising |