faulty rivets may have hastened Titanic's sinking
 

On 2008-04-17 13:47:17 -0400, "Wilbur Hubbard"
said:

"Roger Long" wrote in message
...
I'm going to shut up now and follow the advice I was giving others here.

Yes, make sure those blinders fit tightly. Maybe double earplugs are in order?

Actually, I believe he has been saying that he'll look, but only
respond to those of your posts to which he feels he can contribute.

(IOW: don't feed the trolls)

--
Jere Lull
Xan-à-Deux -- Tanzer 28 #4 out of Tolchester, MD
Xan's pages: http://web.mac.com/jerelull/iWeb/Xan/
Our BVI trips & tips: http://homepage.mac.com/jerelull/BVI/

faulty rivets may have hastened Titanic's sinking
 

"Herodotus" wrote in message
...
I post this as there has been past interest in the Titanic.

http://msn.nzherald.co.nz/section/2/...ectid=10504501

I started to read ,, the postings .. about rivets.. then Wibur, Roger,
Liberals,, Conservatives..

For me: Titanic = boat going too fast, into ice, and then sunk.. That is it
, nothing more.

I wonder though... with the price of fuel, if the ocean liner will be making
a comeback.

Maybe not in the classic sense, but a big ship can carry lots of passengers,
and freight.
With the price of fuel, isn't it possible that the ocean liner is cheaper to
operate than a fleet
of airplanes, et all.

In many parts of the world, passenger shipping is common. Why not in the
USA?

My boat is located near a military runway. All day long the big jets come
and go. What a waste of fuel.

Soon, fuel will be at the $5 dollar per gallon rate. I spoke to a motor
boat, big cruiser, owner today. He
said he doesnt' plan on taking her off the dock .. she will be a condo.

Meanwhile,, plane after plane goes overhead.

faulty rivets may have hastened Titanic's sinking
 

On 2008-04-17 21:32:07 -0400, "Thomas, Spring Point Light"
said:

Maybe not in the classic sense, but a big ship can carry lots of
passengers, and freight.

With the price of fuel, isn't it possible that the ocean liner is
cheaper to operate than a fleet of airplanes, et all.

Passenger travel, I doubt. Time=money for the commercial flier

Freight: Perhaps, particularly for time-insensitive loads. I get a
"feel" that somehow the money for dredging the ICW up the east coast
has been found, which can take a lot of load off of I-95. I certainly
haven't heard much about unusual grounding spots for a few months.

Military traffic=ASAP, "What cost?". (Okay, lots of military freight
(almost said "fright") moves by boat.)

--
Jere Lull
Xan-à-Deux -- Tanzer 28 #4 out of Tolchester, MD
Xan's pages: http://web.mac.com/jerelull/iWeb/Xan/
Our BVI trips & tips: http://homepage.mac.com/jerelull/BVI/

faulty rivets may have hastened Titanic's sinking
 

Perhaps a chilling parallel to the current Boeing "Dreamliner" supply
problems caused (partly) by the lack of "fasteners".... (rivets?)

http://www.designnews.com/article/CA6539816.html




"Herodotus" wrote in message
...
I post this as there has been past interest in the Titanic.

http://msn.nzherald.co.nz/section/2/...ectid=10504501