![]() |
The answer ISN"T an electric or a bigger windlass
On Mon, 14 Apr 2008 19:51:23 -0300, wrote:
"Bloody Horvath" wrote in message .. . On Mon, 14 Apr 2008 08:42:37 -0400, "Wilbur Hubbard" wrote this crap: Therefore, though sail size is a limiting factor, it is not as big a limiting factor as anchor weight. And, I would suggest that more vessels get in trouble due to folks futzing around with anchors that are too heavy for them to handle than with sails that are on the largish end of the spectrum. A "lunch hook" is a trouble hook. Always use an anchor sized for the vessel Wilbur Hubbard I have a thirty-five foot yacht, and NO electric windlass. I have no problem pulling up the anchor. IMO you don't need one until you get 40 foot or larger. I'm Horvath and I approve of this post. For your perusal: Your thirty-five foot yacht, subject to where your are cruising, requires at least a primary anchor of about 35 pounds and a secondary one of about the same size. You may be able to get away with an aluminum anchor like the Fortress or equivalent of about 18 pounds. Not mention the weight of the chain you have a fair load to hoist. Compound this with a fresh wind when you lift your anchor and you will not have to go to Body Plus (Gym) that evening). The other way is to use an undersize anchor and lifting become much easier as well as dragging when the wind starts to freshen up. I never had a windlass for decades with my previous boat using a 13 pounds Danford. Now, with my new boat I carry three anchors, two of 35 pounds each and one of 18 pounds. Having pulled my old Danford for decades I appreciate the electric windlass. My windlass will not work unless the boat engine is on. Should the windlass becomes not operational I can always return to my basic training to pull the anchor or use one of the winches. I'll add a bit to that. You have, say a 40 pound of anchor, anchored in say 30 feet of somewhat exposed water so you have a 5:1 scope out. The wind is blowing onshore at say 7 MPH. You are single handed. I guarantee that you will appreciate having a powered windlass! Bruce-in-Bangkok (correct email address for reply) |
The answer ISN"T an electric or a bigger windlass
On 2008-04-14 13:27:55 -0400, "Wilbur Hubbard"
said: Because they all ARE! It's a biological fact that the elderly are much diminished from their mental and physical capacites they embodied in their prime. It's nothing to be ashamed of but it IS something that should be taken into consideration. To deny aging equates to diminished capacity is to deny reality. But to assert that they are incapable is to deny reality as well. It's not an either-or, but a "both" solution. My wife can't manhandle systems on our boat the way I do. She needs winch handles, for instance, and couldn't easily haul our current anchor and chain by hand. She's a little girl and never had that sort of strength. But she can handle a properly set-up 46' cat as easily as our pocket cruiser once she learns the systems. All it takes is adapting your systems and techniques to the available skills. Sometimes the system needed *is* a smaller boat. We have a few people on our docks who aren't old or particularly incapable, but don't go out single-handed. They should have smaller boats. (Some got sailing dinks for knocking around.) -- Jere Lull Tanzer 28 #4 out of Tolchester, MD Xan's pages: http://web.mac.com/jerelull/iWeb/Xan/ Our BVI trips & tips: http://homepage.mac.com/jerelull/BVI/ |
The answer ISN"T an electric or a bigger windlass
On Mon, 14 Apr 2008 18:46:54 -0400, "Roger Long"
wrote: I have no qualms about my Fortress standing up to the strains that sand, mud, or gravel can put on it. They're OK for certain conditions but I regard them as a special purpose anchor. They will frequently not set in adverse conditions such as: - from a moving boat (anchor planes through water or skips along the bottom). - strong currents (see above). - unfavorable bottom (hard, weedy, rocky, etc). All danforth type anchors have a strong propensity for becoming fouled in reversing tide or wind conditions. They excel however in high holding power for their weight *if* properly set, and if the load direction does not change more than a small amount. |
The answer ISN"T an electric or a bigger windlass
On Mon, 14 Apr 2008 18:38:01 -0600, Paul Cassel
wrote: Thus, as I said, the limiting factor isn't boat size or anchor weight but really, sail area. You need a better sail handling system. Do you have lazy jacks, dutch men, and/or a stack pack system? I have seen one person easily handle the mainsail on a 70 footer using all the above (and an electric halyard winch). It is also important to have your halyard and jiffy reefing lines run back to the cockpit with stoppers and winches, halyard on one side, jiffy reefing on the other. |
The answer ISN"T an electric or a bigger windlass
On Tue, 15 Apr 2008 08:10:52 +0700, Bruce in Bangkok
wrote: 40 feet is marginal for two..... We find that a 49 ft trawler is about right but even that has its limits. |
The answer ISN"T an electric or a bigger windlass
On 2008-04-14 09:24:20 -0400, "Wilbur Hubbard"
said: You are soooo wrong! If your first priority is a sailboat large enough to make it a seaborne reflection of your shoreside residence filled will all the luxuries and frivolity of said lubberly abode then please STAY ashore. He's wrong only if he's alone doing it. Adding a second person at least doubles the "stuff", and very few mates (of either sex) are as dedicated, so the required few concessions add to the clutter. Add occasional family and friends and the requirements pretty much double again (though that space can be reclaimed between times). ----- At work, I'm training my replacements, will be outsourced by the end of the year. If it were just me, I'd sell the house, cut the lines and be in the Bahamas on Xan by this time next year. But having my lady with me makes it so much better, so at most we'll be on a sabbatical of a few months down there. -- Jere Lull Xan-à-Deux -- Tanzer 28 #4 out of Tolchester, MD Xan's pages: http://web.mac.com/jerelull/iWeb/Xan/ Our BVI trips & tips: http://homepage.mac.com/jerelull/BVI/ |
The answer ISN"T an electric or a bigger windlass
On 2008-04-14 17:01:58 -0400, "Capt. JG" said:
I find my 30-footer the perfect size for "extended" day cruising and several overnights. It's big enough to be comfortable, yet it's small enough to make single-handing a breeze in most conditions. Pat and I find our 28' comfortable for about a month at a time, our max cruise so far. Pat thinks Xan's satisfactory for 2-3 months at a clip, but time will tell. -- Jere Lull Xan-à-Deux -- Tanzer 28 #4 out of Tolchester, MD Xan's pages: http://web.mac.com/jerelull/iWeb/Xan/ Our BVI trips & tips: http://homepage.mac.com/jerelull/BVI/ |
The answer ISN"T an electric or a bigger windlass
On 2008-04-14 19:58:04 -0400, Bloody Horvath said:
35 lbs. is hardly more than a sixteen pound bowling ball in each hand. If you can't handle that... shape up or ship out. My sixteen year old nephew can pull up the anchor. Don't forget the chain. We are a size (or maybe two) big on 30' of chain, so have an additional 30# to haul up. Mud can weigh a bit, too. I just imagine most 5'2" 125# women trying to haul that by hand. Yeah, we can lighten our anchor & chain, but would first get a windlass, as we sleep better with what we have mounted. -- Jere Lull Xan-à-Deux -- Tanzer 28 #4 out of Tolchester, MD Xan's pages: http://web.mac.com/jerelull/iWeb/Xan/ Our BVI trips & tips: http://homepage.mac.com/jerelull/BVI/ |
The answer ISN"T an electric or a bigger windlass
On Apr 14, 3:19 pm, Bruce in Bangkok wrote:
I've been aboard some of those 35 ft. cruising boats that have been sailing for several years. The ones that entertain guests in the cockpit because there isn;t room down below for four people to sit down. Well our experience here differs. I've enjoyed a good number of dinners served below by cruising couples in their 30 something foot boats. Some on small 30 something boats. We sat six to dinner one night in Tonga on a 32 foot boat cruised by a couple. Four of us had dinner below on a 25' Pacific Seacraft that was half way between Hawaii and Oz with a couple aboard... I've got two sets of particularly dear friends who've fed us many times in their 36 and 37 foot boats and both pairs of them have been cruising very seriously for over 20 years. One of them is a professional boat builder and a talented sculptor and he keeps an extraordinarily complete set of tools and spares and there's still plenty of room below. Two folks can live and cruise full time on a moderate displacement monohull of 35 feet in some comfort (eg. with a computer, tv, books &c) and still have a place to entertain below, stow a few grand-kids for the occasional week or two and carry a lot of spares. If you absolutely refuse to ever take anything off the boat you'll eventually be entertaining on deck no matter how big your boat is. Of course, bigger boats can carry more, are generally faster, safer and more comfortable at sea, have more privacy, berths that are kinder to old backs and so on. The trade offs are that they're more expensive to keep, and either harder to work or more complex... So, there's an engineering compromise that juggles money, crew strength, tech ability and so on. There are also many aesthetic questions. For instance, I think its good for people to live on boat that gives them a buzz to behold. Some folks want to live with a Zen like simplicity and others want to be reminded of oak and tar... One size does not fit all. But, IMO, all things considered, 36 isn't a bad number. By the way, Pago is civilization. Heck Apia is civilization. They have currier service, hardware stores, engineering shops, you name it. I've had a broken boat in Apia. -- Tom. |
The answer ISN"T an electric or a bigger windlass
"Jere Lull" wrote in message
news:2008041422261877923-jerelull@maccom... On 2008-04-14 19:58:04 -0400, Bloody Horvath said: 35 lbs. is hardly more than a sixteen pound bowling ball in each hand. If you can't handle that... shape up or ship out. My sixteen year old nephew can pull up the anchor. Don't forget the chain. We are a size (or maybe two) big on 30' of chain, so have an additional 30# to haul up. Mud can weigh a bit, too. I just imagine most 5'2" 125# women trying to haul that by hand. Yeah, we can lighten our anchor & chain, but would first get a windlass, as we sleep better with what we have mounted. -- Jere Lull Xan-à-Deux -- Tanzer 28 #4 out of Tolchester, MD Xan's pages: http://web.mac.com/jerelull/iWeb/Xan/ Our BVI trips & tips: http://homepage.mac.com/jerelull/BVI/ Jere... he doesn't actually sail and he certainly has never had to deal with an anchor/chain combo. 30 feet of chain ain't nuthin if you have a all-chain rode. -- "j" ganz @@ www.sailnow.com |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:31 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com