Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]()
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sun, 18 May 08, Jay wrote:
4--Jay is not taking the new Suzuki out on the lake until clarification is ascertained on all of items 1-2-3. Wait a sec. Let's not over react here. Nobody is saying the pushing ability of your motor is broken or even defective. And even if it were to crap out, you're no worse off than when you had no motor at all as long as you have your trusty oars along. Right now the motor is fine. It's only the monitoring system thats appears a little odd. Research in solving the apparent contradictions is ongoing, pervasive, focused and laced with a dose of chagrin. Glad to hear you're looking for an explanation but it's way to early for chagrin. Even a small dose. Rick |
#2
![]()
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On May 19, 8:35*am, wrote:
On Sun, 18 May 08, Jay *wrote: 4--Jay is not taking the new Suzuki out on the lake until clarification is ascertained on all of items 1-2-3. Wait a sec. *Let's not over react here. Nobody is saying the pushing ability of your motor is broken or even defective. And even if it were to crap out, you're no worse off than when you had no motor at all as long as you have your trusty oars along. Right now the motor is fine. It's only the monitoring system thats appears a little odd. Actually, Rick, I'm not really over-reacting; I'm just realizing that in the entire chain of events here something is amiss and I'm the type of person who likes ALL the ducks in a row before moving on. It's not an emotional state, it's a lifestyle. I fully realize that all is well with the motor in general and the only items left to sift out in this mystery are the veracity of the owner's manual vs. the design of the motor and/or both. Research in solving the apparent contradictions is ongoing, pervasive, focused and laced with a dose of chagrin. Glad to hear you're looking for an explanation but it's way to early for chagrin. Even a small dose. Rick Actually I've chatted with two Suzuki mechanics and both have scratched their heads regarding the manual and one is going to reach out to the major shop wizards in the Suzuki USA conglomerate. (And being unable to figure it out at the local level caused him a bit of chagrin...I could sense it through ther telephone wires). However, I'm leaning toward the bogus manual solution but we'll see. I'll let you know as soon as the word trickles down from the mountain. -Jay |
#3
![]()
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Jay wrote:
On May 19, 8:35 am, wrote: On Sun, 18 May 08, Jay wrote: 4--Jay is not taking the new Suzuki out on the lake until clarification is ascertained on all of items 1-2-3. Wait a sec. Let's not over react here. Nobody is saying the pushing ability of your motor is broken or even defective. And even if it were to crap out, you're no worse off than when you had no motor at all as long as you have your trusty oars along. Right now the motor is fine. It's only the monitoring system thats appears a little odd. Actually, Rick, I'm not really over-reacting; I'm just realizing that in the entire chain of events here something is amiss and I'm the type of person who likes ALL the ducks in a row before moving on. It's not an emotional state, it's a lifestyle. I fully realize that all is well with the motor in general and the only items left to sift out in this mystery are the veracity of the owner's manual vs. the design of the motor and/or both. Research in solving the apparent contradictions is ongoing, pervasive, focused and laced with a dose of chagrin. Glad to hear you're looking for an explanation but it's way to early for chagrin. Even a small dose. Rick Actually I've chatted with two Suzuki mechanics and both have scratched their heads regarding the manual and one is going to reach out to the major shop wizards in the Suzuki USA conglomerate. (And being unable to figure it out at the local level caused him a bit of chagrin...I could sense it through ther telephone wires). However, I'm leaning toward the bogus manual solution but we'll see. I'll let you know as soon as the word trickles down from the mountain. -Jay Personally I'd go for running it at the dock with an electronic thermometer monitoring the power head (hollow out a little block of polystyrene so the probe is insulated from the air and tape or wedge the probe against the cylinder head, with a little dab of thermal transfer grease (as used for PC CPUs etc.) for good heat conduction, with the polystyrene over it. Some time spent at varying revs and in and out of gear and you'll soon know which part of the manual to belive. Your own observations are likely to be more accurate than a manual that has suffered in translation . . . I must note however that unless the cooling water telltale or 'pee hole' squirts up into the air jetski style, you are very unlikely to notice a blockage in time. They seem to be more to let you check the impeller isn't b*****ed beginining of each trip. There is no simple way of adding an alarm to an engine without an electrical system at the design stage, One could only design in a thermal trip that operated the kill switch. Probably there would be enough false trips to make it a manufacturer's nightmare and a laywers dream :-( Perhaps there's a market for a minature watch battery powered alarm beeper that sticks inside the cowling with a probe that tapes to the cylinder head. |
#4
![]()
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I've talked to several Suzuki mechanics and to Customer Service at
USA Suzuki Marine and here are "answers" (i.e. "information") I received. 1--The amount of water squirting out of the pilot (pee) hole is determined by the rpms of the motor; the faster the motor revs, the bigger the stream. 2--The idle setting on the motor is 1800 rpm (which seemed quite peppy to me) but is needed to be that fast to keep the impeller pumping water at idle/low speed. 3--At some speeds, there will not be a "stream" of water but only a "mist" that one can feel by putting one's hand in front of the pilot "pee" hole. 4--The manual still sucks. 5--There was a recall issued by Suzuki for certain motors within a serial number range for a defective cooling system. My motor was not in that group. And now for what REALLY ****ED ME OFF! I've owned Suzuki motorcycles and ATVs and have always liked the quality and style of products made in Japan; however, in looking at the motor plate today I saw the words MADE IN THAILAND stamped therein. GRRRRRRRRR...even our outsourcees are now outsourcing. Where will it all end? -Jay (Who may be reliving dreams about that 5HP air-cooled Briggs & Stratton outboard he passed up for $699 although it was probably made in Bangladesh, Nigeria or high in the mountains of Nepal..lol) |
#5
![]()
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Well... my original question is addressed in #3, At least we know
there IS and indicator at all times of impeller operation. That's good. But now I have a new question brought on by #2. I don't think I've ever tried to put any motor in gear at 1800 rpm. Are the backs of your boat seats equipped with head rests? Seems like whiplash may be a problem ;-) Seriously though, stay in touch. I'm interested to know how it all works out over time. Rick ---- still think you did better than the Briggs & Stratton On Fri, 23 May 08, Jay wrote: I've talked to several Suzuki mechanics and to Customer Service at USA Suzuki Marine and here are "answers" (i.e. "information") I received. 1--The amount of water squirting out of the pilot (pee) hole is determined by the rpms of the motor; the faster the motor revs, the bigger the stream. 2--The idle setting on the motor is 1800 rpm (which seemed quite peppy to me) but is needed to be that fast to keep the impeller pumping water at idle/low speed. 3--At some speeds, there will not be a "stream" of water but only a "mist" that one can feel by putting one's hand in front of the pilot "pee" hole. 4--The manual still sucks. 5--There was a recall issued by Suzuki for certain motors within a serial number range for a defective cooling system. My motor was not in that group. And now for what REALLY ****ED ME OFF! I've owned Suzuki motorcycles and ATVs and have always liked the quality and style of products made in Japan; however, in looking at the motor plate today I saw the words MADE IN THAILAND stamped therein. GRRRRRRRRR...even our outsourcees are now outsourcing. Where will it all end? -Jay (Who may be reliving dreams about that 5HP air-cooled Briggs & Stratton outboard he passed up for $699 although it was probably made in Bangladesh, Nigeria or high in the mountains of Nepal..lol) |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Suzuki DF4 vs. DF6 | General | |||
Suzuki 2hp Tell Tale | General | |||
200 hp Suzuki | General | |||
150 HP Suzuki | General | |||
FS: Suzuki 15 HP 4-stroke in NC | Marketplace |