| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#6
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
|
" said:
IMO, Ted Brewer's motion comfort ratio is BS. Brewer is an interested party and he admits that the "ratio" was made up as a kind of joke. There is absolutely no evidence that it works. As a general theory is is indefensible. No, it's defensible on several grounds. It was invented by a knowledgeable NA, it does model that "bigger + heavier = more comfort" which is true, and it is widely quoted. None of that makes it a valuable quantity for comparing boats IMHO. For example, if you take two boats of very similar dimension & displacement, the one with longer overhangs will have a higher "Motion Comfort Index." Why? Because old salty prejudices favor boats with long overhangs. Long overhangs were fashionable in the early 1900s but they don't make a boat more comfortable at sea, if anything they make it wetter, slower, and less "comfortable" by most definitions of the word. .... On any given day I'd bet you'll be a lot more comfortable in a Catalina 30 than you will be in a 5.5 meter both in terms of motion comfort and amenities but you certainly will not learn that from the "comfort" ratio. And you'd be more comfortable yet in a cheap hotel. Where does this fit into the ratio? ![]() ... Any comfort motion rating system that says that the Colin Archer ketch is the pinnacle of comfortable is just plain cr@p. I'd rate the "comfort ratio" as significantly less important than the color of the mast step in my boat comparison list. Of course, TB has a different view. You can see his rational he http://www.tedbrewer.com/yachtdesign.html. Jere Lull wrote: I'd be a bit less inflammatory if I wrote on the subject, Yeah, but where's the fun in that? Then again, if we're heeling between 15 and 25 degrees, my lovely lady knows not to complain as that's normal for our lovely lady/beast/vessel. If she were longer and heavier, the acceptable heel numbers would be a bit lower. And most likely, slower in lighter air. 95% (or more) of all sailing is done in winds of less than 15 knots. Therefor, any boat which does *not* have to reef or reduce sail in 15 ~ 18 knot winds is a *less* capable vessel. But again, old salty prejudices lean the other way.... Fresh Breezes- Doug King |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Motion comfort | Cruising | |||
| Aid and Comfort to the Enemy | ASA | |||
| Cold comfort | Boat Building | |||
| Cold comfort | Cruising | |||
| Pitch & Roll sensor with USB output | Electronics | |||