![]() |
|
Possessed!
Well, we are, at least, about to possess ...
.... But the question is, how. Various prior threads have dealt with various forms of ownership. We're wrestling with whether to take the boat personally, form a corporation, limited liability entity, limited partnership, general partnership, or something else. We'll have pretty limited assets other than the boat, so don't expect we'd be 'targets' of any sort, but there may well be other reasons to take possession other than just personally. Do any here have experience in that area, and if so, why did you do it one way or the other? We'll be living aboard, as our primary residence, and are considering financing for liquidity purposes, not for ability to buy, but might have some use for write-offs, as we'll both be working during part of the year. Unlike our original plans, we'll not use the boat in a charter or other income generation, as far as we can see. Any legal or accounting types looking on with experience in this (how to take possession, and why)? Thanks. L8R Skip and Lydia -- "Twenty years from now you will be more disappointed by the things you didn't do than by the ones you did do. So throw off the bowlines. Sail away from the safe harbor. Catch the trade winds in your sails. Explore. Dream. Discover." - Mark Twain |
Possessed!
Skip
You can run into some real problems if you ever go into a French Island. They have a very different view of US corporations and look at you as some type of hired crew. As such, you must have the proper seamanship (50 tom master) papers as well as permission by the corporation for you to use the boat. Then they want to see how you came to be in possession of a corporate boat and the bull sh@# questions go on and on. There were some real horror stories of entry into French Islands with the paper work a little odd. Best to follow the kiss principle on this one. Buy the boat, pay the tax and get it documented. Life will be much simpler Bruce -- See how our Endeavour is progressing at www.cruisinglife.net/horizonproject.htm |
Possessed!
Skip
You can run into some real problems if you ever go into a French Island. They have a very different view of US corporations and look at you as some type of hired crew. As such, you must have the proper seamanship (50 tom master) papers as well as permission by the corporation for you to use the boat. Then they want to see how you came to be in possession of a corporate boat and the bull sh@# questions go on and on. There were some real horror stories of entry into French Islands with the paper work a little odd. Best to follow the kiss principle on this one. Buy the boat, pay the tax and get it documented. Life will be much simpler Bruce -- See how our Endeavour is progressing at www.cruisinglife.net/horizonproject.htm |
Possessed!
"Bruce" wrote in message
... Skip You can run into some real problems if you ever go into a French Island. They have a very different view of US corporations and look at you as some type of hired crew. As such, you must have the proper seamanship (50 tom master) papers as well as permission by the corporation for you to use the boat. Then they want to see how you came to be in possession of a corporate boat and the bull sh@# questions go on and on. There were some real horror stories of entry into French Islands with the paper work a little odd. Best to follow the kiss principle on this one. Buy the boat, pay the tax and get it documented. Life will be much simpler Bruce The French bit is good to know. It wasn't about tax avoidance, but rather, the various reasons for the various ways to take possession. I think the boats we'll consider will already be documented, so it will be more a matter of whether we boogie for the islands right away or take up residence for a time wherever it is, while we shake it down. L8R Skip and Lydia -- "Twenty years from now you will be more disappointed by the things you didn't do than by the ones you did do. So throw off the bowlines. Sail away from the safe harbor. Catch the trade winds in your sails. Explore. Dream. Discover." - Mark Twain -- See how our Endeavour is progressing at www.cruisinglife.net/horizonproject.htm |
Possessed!
"Bruce" wrote in message
... Skip You can run into some real problems if you ever go into a French Island. They have a very different view of US corporations and look at you as some type of hired crew. As such, you must have the proper seamanship (50 tom master) papers as well as permission by the corporation for you to use the boat. Then they want to see how you came to be in possession of a corporate boat and the bull sh@# questions go on and on. There were some real horror stories of entry into French Islands with the paper work a little odd. Best to follow the kiss principle on this one. Buy the boat, pay the tax and get it documented. Life will be much simpler Bruce The French bit is good to know. It wasn't about tax avoidance, but rather, the various reasons for the various ways to take possession. I think the boats we'll consider will already be documented, so it will be more a matter of whether we boogie for the islands right away or take up residence for a time wherever it is, while we shake it down. L8R Skip and Lydia -- "Twenty years from now you will be more disappointed by the things you didn't do than by the ones you did do. So throw off the bowlines. Sail away from the safe harbor. Catch the trade winds in your sails. Explore. Dream. Discover." - Mark Twain -- See how our Endeavour is progressing at www.cruisinglife.net/horizonproject.htm |
Possessed!
ownership
I'm not a lawyer. Take the following only as an indication of what you may wish to look into. If you already know what state your residence will be in, a good estate lawyer can answer most of your questions. I really don't know what resource could give you a comparative analysis of various states. Your legal residence: There are various tax and legal implications relating to what state you "live" in. There is some heavy duty number crunching needed here because it involves many different types of taxes: sales, income, property, intangible property, inheritance, vehicle, insurance regulations, pension regulations, marital (family) laws, etc. States differ widely on how they regulate and tax boat owners, although the theme generally remains $$$$. In California there is actually a legal method of taking possesion of a boat without paying sales tax (or was 2 years ago when last I looked it up). HOWEVER, some states apparently insist that if you can't prove you've paid sales tax to _somebody_, then you owe it to them if you come and stay within their jurisdiction for some nominal time (3 months?). Since sales tax can be a pretty bit of change, depending on where you berth (what state and county), this may be worth investigating within the context of any plans you have already made. Federal documentation may be helpful in some dire straits. One local harbor had a documented hulk residing grandly in front of the harbor master's office for almost a year - _after_ he started trying to sell it under lien - because the feds wouldn't allow it without the right forms getting filled out. Naturally the owner couldn't find time to file the forms. Various ownerships: If multiple parties own an asset with the word AND between the names on the title, not the word OR, it usually becomes more difficult to seize it all. Certain trust setups allow the placing of large assets in the name of the next generation (or, probably, of anybody else you might choose) while allowing the trustees full use and benefit of that asset during their life times. Estate lawyers know about ownership issues. Quite aside from ownership, another useful practice involves setting up your own company. There are often price advantages to purchasing equipment as one _business_ to another. RJ Systems, with a tax exempt number, buying from Acme Chain & Rigging, usually pays less than Robert Jones using a VISA card at West Marine. But your income tax consultant needs to know about this. Finally, my insurance rant: Insurance is becoming a lose/lose-more proposition for US citizens. I think you will need to invest some serious time in finding a policy. After diligent and deep research to weed out the most egregious rip-offs you will still find your cruising much restricted as you try to not void your policy coverage. In particular you will need to watch your cruising areas, time of year, number of _experienced_ crew, distance from shore, type of equipment, and what the weather report on record has said, where you berth your boat, where you haul it. One issue recently exposed is what coverage you (don't) have between the water and the place your boat is placed in a yard - ie. while it's on the crane or travel-lift. Another sore point is live-aboard issues - some policies prohibit it, others have _no_ personal property or liability coverage. Another point is coverage while you live aboard in a yard. Get a copy of the policy before you waste your time signing it and read all 30 pages of it at least twice. I suspect it will leave a bad taste in your mouth. Actually you may find it quite difficult to even get a copy of the policy, unless you give them money - but it can be done. I'm afraid that to me insurance companies appear to have stopped offering value and started to collect extortion. But for all that, it should be a grand adventure. Good luck. Rufus |
Possessed!
ownership
I'm not a lawyer. Take the following only as an indication of what you may wish to look into. If you already know what state your residence will be in, a good estate lawyer can answer most of your questions. I really don't know what resource could give you a comparative analysis of various states. Your legal residence: There are various tax and legal implications relating to what state you "live" in. There is some heavy duty number crunching needed here because it involves many different types of taxes: sales, income, property, intangible property, inheritance, vehicle, insurance regulations, pension regulations, marital (family) laws, etc. States differ widely on how they regulate and tax boat owners, although the theme generally remains $$$$. In California there is actually a legal method of taking possesion of a boat without paying sales tax (or was 2 years ago when last I looked it up). HOWEVER, some states apparently insist that if you can't prove you've paid sales tax to _somebody_, then you owe it to them if you come and stay within their jurisdiction for some nominal time (3 months?). Since sales tax can be a pretty bit of change, depending on where you berth (what state and county), this may be worth investigating within the context of any plans you have already made. Federal documentation may be helpful in some dire straits. One local harbor had a documented hulk residing grandly in front of the harbor master's office for almost a year - _after_ he started trying to sell it under lien - because the feds wouldn't allow it without the right forms getting filled out. Naturally the owner couldn't find time to file the forms. Various ownerships: If multiple parties own an asset with the word AND between the names on the title, not the word OR, it usually becomes more difficult to seize it all. Certain trust setups allow the placing of large assets in the name of the next generation (or, probably, of anybody else you might choose) while allowing the trustees full use and benefit of that asset during their life times. Estate lawyers know about ownership issues. Quite aside from ownership, another useful practice involves setting up your own company. There are often price advantages to purchasing equipment as one _business_ to another. RJ Systems, with a tax exempt number, buying from Acme Chain & Rigging, usually pays less than Robert Jones using a VISA card at West Marine. But your income tax consultant needs to know about this. Finally, my insurance rant: Insurance is becoming a lose/lose-more proposition for US citizens. I think you will need to invest some serious time in finding a policy. After diligent and deep research to weed out the most egregious rip-offs you will still find your cruising much restricted as you try to not void your policy coverage. In particular you will need to watch your cruising areas, time of year, number of _experienced_ crew, distance from shore, type of equipment, and what the weather report on record has said, where you berth your boat, where you haul it. One issue recently exposed is what coverage you (don't) have between the water and the place your boat is placed in a yard - ie. while it's on the crane or travel-lift. Another sore point is live-aboard issues - some policies prohibit it, others have _no_ personal property or liability coverage. Another point is coverage while you live aboard in a yard. Get a copy of the policy before you waste your time signing it and read all 30 pages of it at least twice. I suspect it will leave a bad taste in your mouth. Actually you may find it quite difficult to even get a copy of the policy, unless you give them money - but it can be done. I'm afraid that to me insurance companies appear to have stopped offering value and started to collect extortion. But for all that, it should be a grand adventure. Good luck. Rufus |
Possessed!
Rufus wrote:
Finally, my insurance rant: Insurance is becoming a lose/lose-more proposition for US citizens... ... I'm afraid that to me insurance companies appear to have stopped offering value and started to collect extortion. I couldn't agree with you more. they don't seem to want to be in their alleged business any more -- that is, the business of gambling, underwriting other people's risks. instead they seem to be in the business of collecting the money and then refusing to pay it out if the slightest risk has been taken. their present focus is not on insuring you against risk, but on trying to prevent you from taking any. will we see the day when boat insurance policies prohibit leaving the dock if the wind exceeds 10 kts? or leaving the dock at all? sour grin in CA these days, many marinas will not rent you a slip unless you can show proof of $300K of liability/collision insurance. some Canadian E Coast insurers, so I hear, are refusing to underwrite any boat with a wood stove aboard (but they are happy about propane stoves which imho are far more dangerous). the insurance biz is becoming a racket: coercive, restrictive, and I fear it may also become mandated (legislation mandating a captive market for them to plunder). grmph. de -- .................................................. ............................ :De Clarke, Software Engineer UCO/Lick Observatory, UCSC: :Mail: | Your planet's immune system is trying to get rid : :Web: www.ucolick.org | of you. --Kurt Vonnegut : :1024D/B9C9E76E | F892 5F17 8E0A F095 05CD EE8B D169 EDAA B9C9 E76E: |
Possessed!
Rufus wrote:
Finally, my insurance rant: Insurance is becoming a lose/lose-more proposition for US citizens... ... I'm afraid that to me insurance companies appear to have stopped offering value and started to collect extortion. I couldn't agree with you more. they don't seem to want to be in their alleged business any more -- that is, the business of gambling, underwriting other people's risks. instead they seem to be in the business of collecting the money and then refusing to pay it out if the slightest risk has been taken. their present focus is not on insuring you against risk, but on trying to prevent you from taking any. will we see the day when boat insurance policies prohibit leaving the dock if the wind exceeds 10 kts? or leaving the dock at all? sour grin in CA these days, many marinas will not rent you a slip unless you can show proof of $300K of liability/collision insurance. some Canadian E Coast insurers, so I hear, are refusing to underwrite any boat with a wood stove aboard (but they are happy about propane stoves which imho are far more dangerous). the insurance biz is becoming a racket: coercive, restrictive, and I fear it may also become mandated (legislation mandating a captive market for them to plunder). grmph. de -- .................................................. ............................ :De Clarke, Software Engineer UCO/Lick Observatory, UCSC: :Mail: | Your planet's immune system is trying to get rid : :Web: www.ucolick.org | of you. --Kurt Vonnegut : :1024D/B9C9E76E | F892 5F17 8E0A F095 05CD EE8B D169 EDAA B9C9 E76E: |
Possessed!
Rufus wrote: Finally, my insurance rant: Insurance is becoming a lose/lose-more proposition for US citizens... ... I'm afraid that to me insurance companies appear to have stopped offering value and started to collect extortion. Then De Clarke wrote: I couldn't agree with you more.... the insurance biz is becoming a racket: coercive, restrictive, and I fear it may also become mandated (legislation mandating a captive market for them to plunder). Most people blame high insurance rates (whether you're talking about boat ins, car ins., business ins. or any other king of insurance) on either lawyers too willing to take on frivolous cases in the insurance lottery or the juries too willing to hand out high awards (especially for pain and suffering). It is a complex equation and these are certainly valid contributors, but consider this. The cost of litigation, let alone the cost of losing a court case has risen so high that it is extremely dangerous not to have insurance. As a result, we have all become captive customers for the handful of insurance companies out there. A number so small that they form what is effectively, if not actually, a monopoly. I've no evidence to back my feelings up, but I really don't believe that insurance companies look upon high awards or settlements as a bad thing. It's the best advertising they have and a wonderful justification for extraordinarily high rates. P.S. I've never understood why my boat/car/house/business insurance rates went up because of the 911 attack. Completely ignoring for the moment that our government succeeded in getting the vast majority of potential plaintiffs to give up their right to sue in return for a cash settlement from the tax payers, my tax rates going up implies that they are pooling ALL risks. If this is so, why do I have to pay more for my teenagers' car insurance that I do for my wife and I? It may be that I'm just too stupid to understand these complex issues, but methinks I see a contradiction here. OK, I'm off the soap box now, we can go back to talking about sailing topics. -- Dan Best - (707) 431-1662, Healdsburg, CA 95448 B-2/75 1977-1979 Tayana 37 #192, "Tricia Jean" http://rangerbest.home.comcast.net/TriciaJean.JPG |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:30 PM. |
|
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com