Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#6
![]()
posted to alt.sailing.asa,rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Joe" wrote Oh a a point you missed on your Titanic assumption is when ordered hard astern the wheel walk of the titanic also pulled her stern to stbd, creating more force against the hull as she grazed the berg. The best evidence, from both ship motion simulators (full size bridge training versions) and study of the hystorical record, is that Titanic's engines were never actually reversed. The center screw was non-reversable and is the only one that would have created significant wheel walk. The wing screws were along side the keel so very little side flow could be created by them. It's actually the lack of side movement or pressure of the hull against the iceberg that is one of the hardest things to explain about the accident. The after part of the ship was swinging away from the iceberg by the time ice reached it. It's a subject I've had more than usual opportunity to consider but this isn't a Titanic forum. -- Roger Long |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Very interesting article | Touring | |||
Interesting article on Applied Aerodynamics | ASA | |||
Noisy Gray | General |