![]() |
|
Interesting article about Jim Gray who went missing
"Roger Long" wrote in message ... "Joe" wrote Looking at the gouge is just a small view, you need to see Titanic bottom for the full picture. I've actually seen more of the Titanic's bottom than all but a roomful of people on the planet. -- Roger Long You ain't just whistling Dixie, Roger. ;-) |
Interesting article about Jim Gray who went missing
On Jul 25, 1:05 pm, "Roger Long" wrote:
"Joe" wrote Looking at the gouge is just a small view, you need to see Titanic bottom for the full picture. I've actually seen more of the Titanic's bottom than all but a roomful of people on the planet. -- Roger Long I'm aware of what you have seen and done Roger, cool gig if you can get it. Question: How did you go under the Titanic and look at her bottom? She's sitting on her bottom...on the bottom...did you tunnel? ;0) http://channel.nationalgeographic.co...teractive.html Joe |
Interesting article about Jim Gray who went missing
Joe wrote:
On Jul 25, 12:33 pm, "Roger Long" wrote: "Joe" wrote Oh a a point you missed on your Titanic assumption is when ordered hard astern the wheel walk of the titanic also pulled her stern to stbd, creating more force against the hull as she grazed the berg. The best evidence, from both ship motion simulators (full size bridge training versions) and study of the hystorical record, is that Titanic's engines were never actually reversed. The center screw was non-reversable and is the only one that would have created significant wheel walk. The wing screws were along side the keel so very little side flow could be created by them. Do you know what type screws she had outboard to stbd, I'd bet she had a LH . It's actually the lack of side movement or pressure of the hull against the iceberg that is one of the hardest things to explain about the accident. The after part of the ship was swinging away from the iceberg by the time ice reached it. Looking at the gouge is just a small view, you need to see Titanic bottom for the full picture. Most bergs are 90%+ submerged and the bottom may have taken a harder shove lessing the side gouge. http://defiant.corban.edu/gtipton/net-fun/iceberg.html http://www.snopes.com/photos/natural/iceberg.asp DT |
Interesting article about Jim Gray who went missing
On Jul 26, 1:06 pm, dt wrote:
Joe wrote: On Jul 25, 12:33 pm, "Roger Long" wrote: "Joe" wrote Oh a a point you missed on your Titanic assumption is when ordered hard astern the wheel walk of the titanic also pulled her stern to stbd, creating more force against the hull as she grazed the berg. The best evidence, from both ship motion simulators (full size bridge training versions) and study of the hystorical record, is that Titanic's engines were never actually reversed. The center screw was non-reversable and is the only one that would have created significant wheel walk. The wing screws were along side the keel so very little side flow could be created by them. Do you know what type screws she had outboard to stbd, I'd bet she had a LH . It's actually the lack of side movement or pressure of the hull against the iceberg that is one of the hardest things to explain about the accident. The after part of the ship was swinging away from the iceberg by the time ice reached it. Looking at the gouge is just a small view, you need to see Titanic bottom for the full picture. Most bergs are 90%+ submerged and the bottom may have taken a harder shove lessing the side gouge. http://defiant.corban.edu/gtipton/net-fun/iceberg.html http://www.snopes.com/photos/natural/iceberg.asp DT- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Still a good rendention of shape by a berg expert, I never said it was a real picture DT. Every berg is different but all fit into class shapes like domed, drydock, tabular, blocky, wedge, pinnacle. I bet it was a drydock or tabular type berg that cause the pressure to decrease as she ripped Titanics hull side (not Bottom),as Roger Long stated puzzled the computor models and experts, that.... and the icecube bounce effect. In my oilfield days I worked in some large tow groups that had a few X berg wranglers running tugs, and they always said to keep a wide wide berth as 90% of a big berg is underwater and often in the form of shelfs, like hitting a rock bottom. Joe .. |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:01 PM. |
|
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com