![]() |
Clueless in (not Seattle) Amps, etc.
Since refrigeration is probably your largest consumer of power, and most
people don't *really* know how many hours a day their system runs, I would suggest that you get a 12V run-hour meter and wire it into your system. Log how many hours it runs and keep that in a spreadsheet and calculate how much power you're using on a daily basis. I do this and it lets me know how well the system is working and points out any potential problems which may be forming. Since I designed and built my system, I also have a tendancy to play with the expansion valve settings and thermostat set-points. This allows me see how the changes have effected the performance. I tend to go a bit overboard and keep track of both the refrigeration and freezer run hours. -- Geoff |
Clueless in (not Seattle) Amps, etc.
On Jul 27, 6:40 am, Skip Gundlach wrote:
Perhaps I'll just have to learn to live on less than 200AH/day, OH MY GOD ! Skip, you need either: 1) **** can everything: solar, wind, humongous dueling alts and get one good gen set. OR 2) walk the streets. find some peyote buttons or lsd and go on a vision quest. A significant paradigm shift is in order. Bob |
Amps, etc.
Wayne.B wrote in
: On Fri, 27 Jul 2007 05:21:01 -0500, Geoff Schultz wrote: And don't forget cooling. A 200A alternator is going to generate a lot of heat and will need to be cooled. You just can't throw it into an enclosed engine space and expect it to crank out 200A without burning up. You need to have a 3 stage controller with a thermocouple on the alternator and you need to pipe air into the engine space. Good points. In the end you may find that a generator coupled to an inverter/charger has a lot to recommend it. Maybe this is what we need......(c; http://www.fleetsource.com/Alternator_p/4900j.htm Will a 4 cyl 4-154 Perkins turn it and the prop simultaneously, or will we have to wait for the batteries to come up before coming out of neutral on the tranny?? Larry -- While in Mexico, I didn't have to press 1 for Spanish. While in Iran, I didn't have to press 1 for Farsi, either. While in Florida, I had to press 2 for English. It just isn't fair. |
Amps, etc.
On Fri, 27 Jul 2007 07:55:55 -0400, Wayne.B
wrote: On Thu, 26 Jul 2007 12:55:16 -0500, "KLC Lewis" wrote: I don't find anything on the Smartguage site that says how their meter can do it without a shunt, and with only two wires connected directly to the battery bank. It can't of course, it can only guesstimate. If you want to measure something you need the proper tools. The tool in this case is a shunt. That is analagous to using a flowmeter in your fuel line to drive your speedometer (via a lookup table) ;-) A shunt is used to measure current as you well know. The Magic box that looks at the shunt counts in and out then "guesstimates" based upon a number of parameters set by the installer that may be right or may be wrong at that point in the banks life. The final result is therefore ????? However most with amp counters assume the numbers are gospel! On the other hand you can argue that all that is really needed is a digital voltmeter to approximate state of charge. If your batteries are reading 12.6 volts under a light to moderate load, they are at 100%. Dropping down to 11.6 volts under the same conditions, they are at 50% and need to be recharged immediately. Granted (maybe) but the "average" boater has no idea what load is on at the time, and the average boater feels everything is OK if he sees 12.00 volts! How do you explain the real life discrepancy between units as discussed in my original post? The amp counter was WRONG! Oh and by the way try leaving an amp counter on a battery with no load for 6 months and see if it reads the correct information! No amps out, no amps in, bank is 100% !!! is it hell! -- Richard Nb "Pound Eater" Parkend G+S "Governments are like Nappies, they should be changed often." (For the same reason) |
Clueless in (not Seattle) Amps, etc.
Skip Gundlach wrote:
I'm obviously missing a great deal of intelligence here. I had thought we'd properly sized our bank and input sources to allow for our anticipated usages. Obviously I was mistaken; I need a large-frame alternator and the appropriate drive components, in order to only bring my bank to 90%. Wet cell batteries are a very mature technology. The rules for them are very simple. 1) If you want to consume 200AH/day, you must generate 250AH/day of replacement energy. You can play all kind of regulator games, but in the end, the overall average replacement rate is about 15% of the bank capacity or in this case, 15%(750)=112.5A. The minimum recharge time will be: 250/112.5=2.2 hours. How you choose to get it done is your business, but the above rules define the task. Solar: For an engineering estimate, use a 2ftx4ft,80W panel which translates into 10W/sq ft. Derate 50% for dirt, clouds, angle of attack, etc, thus 5W/sq ft. As a year around average use 12 hours/day, thus 12hours(5W/sq ft))=60 watt-hours/sq ft/day. 60watt-hours/12volts=5amp-hours/sq ft/day. To generate 250AH of solar you need 250/5=50sq ft or at least 7 2ftx4ft panels. Probably not going to happen unless you build a hard bimini so you have a place to plant your solar garden. That's why alternators like the L/N 4800/4805 family exist. Modest size, only 145/165 output depending on model, but either deliver in excess of 100A at 2,000 alternator. Ya pays ya money, ya takes ya pick. Lew |
Amps, etc.
"Electricky Dicky" wrote in message ... A shunt is used to measure current as you well know. The Magic box that looks at the shunt counts in and out then "guesstimates" based upon a number of parameters set by the installer that may be right or may be wrong at that point in the banks life. The final result is therefore ????? However most with amp counters assume the numbers are gospel! snippage -- Richard Nb "Pound Eater" Parkend G+S "Governments are like Nappies, they should be changed often." (For the same reason) So it really comes down to choosing your choice of "magic boxes" which "guesstimate"? How is the Smartguage better than the Link 10, if they both "guesstimate" the state of charge? |
Amps, etc.
On Thu, 26 Jul 2007 10:23:19 -0700, Pete C
wrote: On Jul 26, 4:29 pm, Stephen Trapani wrote: Can't a person extrapolate state of charge with a simple voltmeter? Good point, you can, with a few caveats which are covered by the battery FAQ I posted a link to. I'd probably use the voltmeter as a rough and ready guide on a day to day basis, and a hydro now and then to verify it. Cross referring the two could be pretty useful. This is a wireless SG sensor setup. Data can be fed to a PDA, laptop or desktop and crunched by the relevant software for analysis. http://www.electrosense.com.au/SG-Electrode.htm Toss out those old hydrometers. You can probably get a nice setup of these for less than $10k. Agitator beds for the batteries could be added if desired, but I haven't looked for them. If I ordered any of this stuff I would want a couple pocket protectors thrown in gratis. --Vic |
Amps, etc.
On Jul 27, 10:06 pm, Vic Smith
wrote: This is a wireless SG sensor setup. Data can be fed to a PDA, laptop or desktop and crunched by the relevant software for analysis.http://www.electrosense.com.au/SG-Electrode.htm Toss out those old hydrometers. You can probably get a nice setup of these for less than $10k. Agitator beds for the batteries could be added if desired, but I haven't looked for them. If I ordered any of this stuff I would want a couple pocket protectors thrown in gratis. LOL! For checking SG under way a refractometer might be easier, on the pocket at least! eg: http://cgi.ebay.com/Battery-Acid-Ant...lycol-Coolant- Refractometer- F_W0QQitemZ230154976520QQihZ013QQcategoryZ111537QQ ssPageNameZWDVWQQrdZ1QQcmdZViewItem cheers, Pete. |
Amps, etc.
On Fri, 27 Jul 2007 14:25:53 -0700, Pete C
wrote: On Jul 27, 10:06 pm, Vic Smith wrote: This is a wireless SG sensor setup. Data can be fed to a PDA, laptop or desktop and crunched by the relevant software for analysis.http://www.electrosense.com.au/SG-Electrode.htm Toss out those old hydrometers. You can probably get a nice setup of these for less than $10k. Agitator beds for the batteries could be added if desired, but I haven't looked for them. If I ordered any of this stuff I would want a couple pocket protectors thrown in gratis. LOL! For checking SG under way a refractometer might be easier, on the pocket at least! eg: http://cgi.ebay.com/Battery-Acid-Ant...lycol-Coolant- Refractometer- F_W0QQitemZ230154976520QQihZ013QQcategoryZ111537Q QssPageNameZWDVWQQrdZ1QQcmdZViewItem So many gadgets, so little time. --Vic |
Amps, etc.
On Fri, 27 Jul 2007 15:07:44 -0500, "KLC Lewis"
wrote: "Electricky Dicky" wrote in message .. . A shunt is used to measure current as you well know. The Magic box that looks at the shunt counts in and out then "guesstimates" based upon a number of parameters set by the installer that may be right or may be wrong at that point in the banks life. The final result is therefore ????? However most with amp counters assume the numbers are gospel! snippage -- Richard Nb "Pound Eater" Parkend G+S "Governments are like Nappies, they should be changed often." (For the same reason) So it really comes down to choosing your choice of "magic boxes" which "guesstimate"? How is the Smartguage better than the Link 10, if they both "guesstimate" the state of charge? Don't ask me, it was Wayne that said that the "Smartgauge" estimated not me! -- Richard Nb "Pound Eater" Parkend G+S "Governments are like Nappies, they should be changed often." (For the same reason) |
Amps, etc.
"Electricky Dicky" wrote in message ... On Fri, 27 Jul 2007 15:07:44 -0500, "KLC Lewis" wrote: So it really comes down to choosing your choice of "magic boxes" which "guesstimate"? How is the Smartguage better than the Link 10, if they both "guesstimate" the state of charge? Don't ask me, it was Wayne that said that the "Smartgauge" estimated not me! -- Richard Nb "Pound Eater" Parkend G+S "Governments are like Nappies, they should be changed often." (For the same reason) Sorry, I was thinking you were the one selling the Smartguages. Unless you are, in which case I still ask the question. They are all magic boxes that guesstimate, so how does the Smartguage guesstimate better? And if you aren't the proper one to answer, can the correct person please jump in? |
Clueless in (not Seattle) Amps, etc.
On Fri, 27 Jul 2007 19:37:37 GMT, Lew Hodgett
wrote stuff and I replied: snip I agree largely with you Lew, but I reckon that you are being a bit _generous_ with the solar panels' capabilities. Solar: For an engineering estimate, use a 2ftx4ft,80W panel which translates into 10W/sq ft. Derate 50% for dirt, clouds, angle of attack, etc, thus 5W/sq ft. As a year around average use 12 hours/day, thus 12hours(5W/sq ft))=60 watt-hours/sq ft/day. 60watt-hours/12volts=5amp-hours/sq ft/day. To generate 250AH of solar you need 250/5=50sq ft or at least 7 2ftx4ft panels. Human bevaviour: Bestiality with a brain |
Amps, etc.
On Fri, 27 Jul 2007 19:20:54 +0000, Larry wrote:
Maybe this is what we need......(c; http://www.fleetsource.com/Alternator_p/4900j.htm Will a 4 cyl 4-154 Perkins turn it and the prop simultaneously, or will we have to wait for the batteries to come up before coming out of neutral on the tranny?? It will use 3 to 4 hp under load. That should not be a problem if the Perkins is running OK and you use dual belts. That's the right unit assuming you can get a mount fabricated and the Perkins has dual drive sheaves. Nothing less is going to get that bank of L-16s charged in a reasonable length of time. |
Amps, etc.
In article om,
Pete C wrote: LOL! For checking SG under way a refractometer might be easier, on the pocket at least! eg: and the clothes...... Bruce in alaska -- add a 2 before @ |
Amps, etc.
In article ,
Wayne.B wrote: On Fri, 27 Jul 2007 19:20:54 +0000, Larry wrote: Maybe this is what we need......(c; http://www.fleetsource.com/Alternator_p/4900j.htm Will a 4 cyl 4-154 Perkins turn it and the prop simultaneously, or will we have to wait for the batteries to come up before coming out of neutral on the tranny?? It will use 3 to 4 hp under load. That should not be a problem if the Perkins is running OK and you use dual belts. That's the right unit assuming you can get a mount fabricated and the Perkins has dual drive sheaves. Nothing less is going to get that bank of L-16s charged in a reasonable length of time. Actually a single GearTooth Belt and GearTooth Sheaves can transfer up to 8 HP with ease..... Bruce in alaska -- add a 2 before @ |
Amps, etc.
On Sat, 28 Jul 2007 20:02:33 GMT, Bruce in Alaska
wrote: Actually a single GearTooth Belt and GearTooth Sheaves can transfer up to 8 HP with ease..... Probably so but most of us do not have gear tooth sheaves. |
Amps, etc.
Bruce in Alaska wrote:
In article , Wayne.B wrote: On Fri, 27 Jul 2007 19:20:54 +0000, Larry wrote: Maybe this is what we need......(c; http://www.fleetsource.com/Alternator_p/4900j.htm Will a 4 cyl 4-154 Perkins turn it and the prop simultaneously, or will we have to wait for the batteries to come up before coming out of neutral on the tranny?? It will use 3 to 4 hp under load. That should not be a problem if the Perkins is running OK and you use dual belts. That's the right unit assuming you can get a mount fabricated and the Perkins has dual drive sheaves. Nothing less is going to get that bank of L-16s charged in a reasonable length of time. Actually a single GearTooth Belt and GearTooth Sheaves can transfer up to 8 HP with ease..... Bruce in alaska You can do 24 HP with an 8 rib micro vee. But if you have vee belts, it doesn't matter.... -- “TANSTAAFL” __________________________________________________ __________________________ "A prudent man foresees the difficulties ahead and prepares for them; The simpleton goes blindly on and suffers the consequences." - Proverbs 22:3 __________________________________________________ __________________________ |
Amps, etc.
Wayne.B wrote in
: reasonable length of time = 5 hours from 40% down....(c; Larry |
Amps, etc.
Electricky Dicky wrote in
: snippage http://www.factorydirect2you.com/di.html I always thought it would be great to modify a cell cap to permanently mount the probe for one of these digital hydrometers into one cell on the house batteries. No guesstimating here....you can READ the GRAVITY, the only way to tell the condition of charge in a wetcell battery. Price has come down a lot....$50! Even if you couldn't mount it, its use would be much easier than a glass hydrometer with the batteries buried like they are in most yachts. Lots of boats, you can't even get the glass hydrometer into the cells, much less actually read it. Larry -- While in Mexico, I didn't have to press 1 for Spanish. While in Iran, I didn't have to press 1 for Farsi, either. While in Florida, I had to press 2 for English. It just isn't fair. |
Amps, etc.
Electricky Dicky wrote in
: snippage Yahoo found lots of digital hydrometers....some with probes you can mount... http://shopping.yahoo.com/search/; _ylc=X3oDMTJuYWNqZDEzBF9TAzk2MDc5MjYwBGFkZ3JwAzI4N zA1NjUyMwRldnQDODc3NzE1Mw RrA2RpZ2l0YWwgaHlkcm9tZXRlcgRvbW0DYnJvYWQEc2VjA2ti BHNsawN0aXRsZQ--? view=l&p=digital+hydrometer&sp=pall&no_truncation= 1&sem=google http://tinyurl.com/2kq62e same URL...much easier to click. Larry -- While in Mexico, I didn't have to press 1 for Spanish. While in Iran, I didn't have to press 1 for Farsi, either. While in Florida, I had to press 2 for English. It just isn't fair. |
Amps, etc.
On Sat, 28 Jul 2007 22:37:14 +0000, Larry wrote:
reasonable length of time = 5 hours from 40% down....(c; Larry That's too long for practical usage. Let's run the numbers: Trojan L16s are approximately 400 AH, 2 in parallel, 800 AH. Max recharge rate in bulk charge mode at 25% = 200 amps, 150 if you're conservative and temperature limited. AH to be replaced at 40% down up to 80% of full charge = 160 AH (going above 80% takes too long so must of us settle for that or slightly higher) Time to achieve 80% is approx 1 hour, 90% about 2 hours, and that's good enough. My batteries have been lasting 3+ years with that kind of usage and I'm OK with it given the amount of time I spend onboard, and the amount of geneator time the inverter saves me. |
Amps, etc.
Wayne.B wrote in
: On Sat, 28 Jul 2007 22:37:14 +0000, Larry wrote: reasonable length of time = 5 hours from 40% down....(c; Larry That's too long for practical usage. Let's run the numbers: Trojan L16s are approximately 400 AH, 2 in parallel, 800 AH. Max recharge rate in bulk charge mode at 25% = 200 amps, 150 if you're conservative and temperature limited. AH to be replaced at 40% down up to 80% of full charge = 160 AH (going above 80% takes too long so must of us settle for that or slightly higher) Time to achieve 80% is approx 1 hour, 90% about 2 hours, and that's good enough. My batteries have been lasting 3+ years with that kind of usage and I'm OK with it given the amount of time I spend onboard, and the amount of geneator time the inverter saves me. That'll work.....It's fine..... I just don't want to be aboard any boat with 120A applied to these batteries, sealed away in a really tight box where there is ZERO cooling, effectively, for hours on end. I'd hate to be the one they blame when the plates warp and touch each other, resulting in an acid steam explosion. Have you ever seen one? Even the stainless flatware sealed away in a drawer far away from the batteries was just eaten alive...pitted by acid fumes. All the clothes in the cabinets way up in the V-berth were acid eaten, too! Everything aboard had to be tossed...anything fuming sulfuric acid gas could eat. I certainly wouldn't want to be stranded aboard in some hermit's cove on the hook when it happened! BOOM! The one I saw was caused by a big battery charger at the dock whos electronic controller malfunctioned leaving the 40A beast on full current way past time to shut down, which it couldn't do. I wondered how high the voltage got at 40A when she blew! Larry -- |
Amps, etc.
On Sun, 29 Jul 2007 03:56:48 +0000, Larry wrote:
I just don't want to be aboard any boat with 120A applied to these batteries, sealed away in a really tight box where there is ZERO cooling, effectively, for hours on end. That can not happen with a proper 3 stage charge regulator. It certainly is not going to happen on a sailboat using the aux engine to recharge batteries. No one wants to run that engine longer than necessary. |
Clueless in (not Seattle) Amps, etc.-Update
Lew Hodgett wrote:
Skip Gundlach wrote: I'm obviously missing a great deal of intelligence here. I had thought we'd properly sized our bank and input sources to allow for our anticipated usages. Obviously I was mistaken; I need a large-frame alternator and the appropriate drive components, in order to only bring my bank to 90%. Wet cell batteries are a very mature technology. The rules for them are very simple. 1) If you want to consume 200AH/day, you must generate 250AH/day of replacement energy. You can play all kind of regulator games, but in the end, the overall average replacement rate is about 15% of the bank capacity or in this case, 15%(750)=112.5A. The minimum recharge time will be: 250/112.5=2.2 hours. The only way to reduce the recharge time is to increase the size of the battery bank which in turn allows for a higher recharge rate. Still no free lunch, but does reduce the recharge time. Batteries to a cruising sailor are like clamps to a wood worker, you can never have too many. How you choose to get it done is your business, but the above rules define the task. Solar: For an engineering estimate, use a 2ftx4ft,80W panel which translates into 10W/sq ft. Derate 50% for dirt, clouds, angle of attack, etc, thus 5W/sq ft. As a year around average use 12 hours/day, thus 12hours(5W/sq ft))=60 watt-hours/sq ft/day. 60watt-hours/12volts=5amp-hours/sq ft/day. To generate 250AH of solar you need 250/5=50sq ft or at least 7 2ftx4ft panels. Probably not going to happen unless you build a hard bimini so you have a place to plant your solar garden. That's why alternators like the L/N 4800/4805 family exist. Modest size, only 145/165 output depending on model, but either deliver in excess of 100A at 2,000 alternator. Ya pays ya money, ya takes ya pick. Lew |
Clueless in (not Seattle) Amps, etc.
OldNick wrote:
I agree largely with you Lew, but I reckon that you are being a bit _generous_ with the solar panels' capabilities. That is why it was called an "engineering estimate" If you vary more than a few degrees from the equator, you will need more panels for sure. Lew |
Clueless in (not Seattle) Amps, etc.-Update
On Jul 31, 12:38 am, Lew Hodgett wrote:
Batteries to a cruising sailor are like clamps to a wood worker, you can never have too many. How about 2 alts and 2 banks, use the banks alternately so one is bulk charged while the other is absorption charged at the same time. Plenty of redundancy too. Maybe 2x 75A alts and controllers are cheaper than a 150A alt and controller. Also solar will work better with a bank that is between 50-85% state of charge. cheers, Pete. |
Clueless in (not Seattle) Amps, etc.-Update
On Thu, 02 Aug 2007 04:29:11 -0700, Pete C
wrote: Maybe 2x 75A alts and controllers are cheaper than a 150A alt and controller. The battery bank in question is close to 800 AH and can not be recharged from 40 or 50% depletion in a reasonable length of time by a 75 amp alternator. The main cost of the 200 amp alternator is in the installation work, also an issue with a dual alternator set up. |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:47 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com