Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
If.....radar was THAT sensitive then why was I, sailing a 43 footer, nearly
run over by a tanker in the English Channel between Flushing and Lowestoft? The weather was stormy, rainy and it happened in the middle of the night during a downpour! And....vessels are not on auto pilot in that location. Radar is a tool, but it does not replace common sense ;-) -- c ya Wim www.cruising.ca/thousand/f-index.html "surfnturf" wrote in message news:xlMvb.461044$pl3.204000@pd7tw3no... : The waters cited are not prone to large swells, but I have been in a water : taxi late at night and seen the radar pick out logs and other debris on the : water. It was overcast, poor visibility and moderately high wind at the : time. : : Unfortunately, did not note manufacturer of unit. : : surfnturf : : "Doug Dotson" wrote in message : ... : Maybe on a dead calm sea. : : "Tom Dacon" wrote in message : ... : : : The stuff is so low in the water that it can't be picked up by radar. : A : debris object would have to be nearly as large as your boat to set off : any : radar collision alarm.. : : : This hasn't been my experience. In calm inner waters, such as the inland : passage along the west coast of Canada, radar when set to short range : can : commonly pick up a log or the top of a deadhead if it breaks the water's : surface, and it will routinely pick up a seagull standing on top of it. : In : fact, I've even seen it pick up the riffles from a tidal rip. : : Tom Dacon : : : : : : |