Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#30
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Avoidance strategies might reduce the odds of collision somewhat, but not enough to
consider the risk eliminated. Radar, for instance, might work in some conditions, but not all. This leaves two approaches: one, which has been discussed, is preparing to handle the damage efficiently. I'd be curious what percentage of collision damages event can be handled with a collision mat, and how many required abandoning ship. Clearly, when the damage is too severe, most vessels will sink like the proverbial stone, but there are certain levels of damage where a mat will save the day. The third approach is to reduce the odds of the vessel sinking, with positive floatation and/or collision bulkheads. Multihulls have an advantage, since they don't have the dead weight of the keel, and the hulls are shaped to facilitate flotation chambers. But any relatively light vessel can be made reasonably unsinkable. One can make a case that floatation bags are a better investment than a liferaft. -- -jeff www.sv-loki.com "The sea was angry that day, my friend. Like an old man trying to send back soup at the deli." "Courtney Thomas" wrote in message ... Is there an electronic strategy with alarms to avoid collision with floating objects while sailing ? A full description would be appreciated. Thank you. -- Courtney Thomas s/v Mutiny lying Oriental, NC WDB5619 |