krj wrote:

Don W wrote:

Geoff,

Geoff Schultz wrote:

Don W wrote in
. net:

Hi Rosie,

I don't see what is the big deal about getting a couple of
crewmembers to go on the longer passages. Worst case, you spend a
little more on the provisions.

Personally, I decided some time ago that to do the Pacific I want at
least four capable people on the boat. This allows for 12 hour
two-person shifts at sea, as well as two people on the boat at all
times for anchor watch once you arrive. Only two people on the boat
is too much work for me. I'm cruising to have fun!



If you think that 12 hour shifts are a good idea, then I never want
to sail with you! I personally think that 3 people crews work
great. You get 4 on, 8 off. If there's a problem, then you've got 1
person who's been down for at least 4 hours. Anything more than 4
hours at night is too long.

-- Geoff


A 12 hour two-person shift allows each person to do 2 hours on, 2
hours off or 3 hours on, 3 hours off with their companion crewperson,
and then to get up to 12 hours of uninterupted rest before coming back
on for another 12 hour two-person shift. If there's a problem, you've
got two people who are on shift to take care of it without waking the
two who are off shift. Also, your 12 hour shift alway starts at the
same time each day, so you don't have to deal with upsetting your
sleep cycle.

If you think that this is a bad idea, I believe you must still not
quite understand how the schedule works. It is much better than a
2-person crew with 3 on / 3 off continuous, or your 3-person crew with
4 on / 8 off except in case of need -- at least for me.

If you still think its a bad idea, I'd really like to understand your
objections.

Don W.

Your original post on 12 hour shifts wasn't clear. I thought you meant
12 continuous hours on shift, which is almost impossible. 3 on, three
off for 12 hours is very doable.
krj

Ahh... I thought it must have come out a little
muddled.

Don W.