![]() |
Question for Peggy
Peggy,
I am re-plumbing my holding tank to include a macerator pump, Y-valve, and through hull. The easiest way to mount the macerator pump is to screw it into the outlet of the tank then plumb to the y-valve. Question is, will the pump out be able to suck through the pump or can I turn the pump on while pumping out the tank. Also is there any problem with pushing stuff through the Y-valve rather than pulling through the valve. Thanks krj |
Question for Peggy
On Feb 2, 5:06 pm, krj wrote:
Peggy, I am re-plumbing my holding tank to include a macerator pump, Y-valve, and through hull. The easiest way to mount the macerator pump is to screw it into the outlet of the tank then plumb to the y-valve. Question is, will the pump out be able to suck through the pump or can I turn the pump on while pumping out the tank. Also is there any problem with pushing stuff through the Y-valve rather than pulling through the valve. Thanks krj Typically the Y-valve diverts the contents of the head either to the holding tank or overboard through a thru-hull fitting. You could cut into the holding tank pumpout hose and install a T and run your macerator pump off that. That way the pumpout process wouldn't be sucking waste through the macerator pump. The discharge line on your macerator pump would then go to your thru-hull fitting thru a looped hose with a syphon break fitting. The Y valve wouldn't be involved at all in evacuating the holding tank. |
Question for Peggy
|
Question for Peggy
"krj" wrote in message ... Peggy, I am re-plumbing my holding tank to include a macerator pump, Y-valve, and through hull. The easiest way to mount the macerator pump is to screw it into the outlet of the tank then plumb to the y-valve. Question is, will the pump out be able to suck through the pump or can I turn the pump on while pumping out the tank. Also is there any problem with pushing stuff through the Y-valve rather than pulling through the valve. Thanks krj |
Question for Peggy
I've had very good luck with this very simple set up shown on this and the
following page. http://home.maine.rr.com/rlma/Strider0601.htm No "Y" valve, no macerator pump. You have to pump by hand but, hey, we could all use a little exercise at our age. There is no direct overboard discharge I find pumping out the tank occasionally less trouble than remembering to constantly switch back and forth as we move in and out of no-discharge zones. In our home waters, we usually have to make a special diversion to get to an area where we can pump. Most pumping is dond at the dock. The deck fitting seals well enough that the hand pump sucks through the "T". When back flushing the tank with fresh water, I open the discharge pump the hand pump a few strokes as the FW runs to clear the discharge lines. If you have a small crew and primarily pump at the dock, this is a very simple and workable set up. Someone will point out the lack of a vented loop on the discharge. Save your fingers. The through hull is only open when pumping and never needs to be operated by a crew or guest. Even if it was left open, the water would have to flow against two one way valves in the pump, fill the tank, and then flow against the joker valve. It might sink the boat after a few weeks at the dock but it's on the leaving boat checklist. Not having to pump through the longer pipe or having a siphon break to leak odors from a dirtly line makes the very slight risk worthwhile. If I ever need a survey for insurance, I'm sure I'll have a fight with the surveyor though. "krj" wrote in message ... Peggy, I am re-plumbing my holding tank to include a macerator pump, Y-valve, and through hull. The easiest way to mount the macerator pump is to screw it into the outlet of the tank then plumb to the y-valve. Question is, will the pump out be able to suck through the pump or can I turn the pump on while pumping out the tank. Also is there any problem with pushing stuff through the Y-valve rather than pulling through the valve. Thanks krj |
Question for Peggy
krj wrote:
Peggy, I am re-plumbing my holding tank to include a macerator pump, Y-valve, and through hull. The easiest way to mount the macerator pump is to screw it into the outlet of the tank then plumb to the y-valve. Question is, will the pump out be able to suck through the pump or can I turn the pump on while pumping out the tank. Also is there any problem with pushing stuff through the Y-valve rather than pulling through the valve. It doesn't matter whether waste is pushed or pulled through a y-valve. However, the pump, whether manual or electric, should be after the y-valve. If it's ahead of the y-valve, it'll interfere with pumpout. A particularly strong pumpout might be able to pull waste out of the tank through the pump, but that much suction is likely to damage the pump. You could eliminate the y-valve altogether by specifying two discharge fittings in the tank...the hose from one goes directly to the deck fitting...the hose from the other goes directly to the pump, vented loop and overboard. That would allow you to connect the macerator directly to the tank--but I don't recommend it 'cuz it increases the risk of cracking the female fitting in the tank. -- Peggie ---------- Peggie Hall Specializing in marine sanitation since 1987 Author "Get Rid of Boat Odors - A Guide To Marine Sanitation Systems and Other Sources of Aggravation and Odor" http://shop.sailboatowners.com/books...ku=90&cat=1304 |
Question for Peggy
I've often wondered it this setup requires a "lock" on the pumpout to
comply with 33CFR159. Most descriptions of the reg refer to "preventing accidental discharge" or securing a "direct discharge" line. It would appear that the chance of an "accident" on your system is essentially nil. Mine is similar, except that it includes a y-valve to allow for either a manual pump discharge, or a deck pumpout. Since the y-valve looks like one that might permit direct discharge, I often keep a cable tie on it. I could also lock the hatch or hide the pump handle, but I'd probably lose the key or handle! Unfortunately, the actually CFR doesn't actually mention "accidental" or "direct discharge." It more generally requires securing any means of discharge. If the holding tank is considered part of the MSD Type III system, then it would seem its pumping system would be included. 33CFR159.7 Roger Long wrote: I've had very good luck with this very simple set up shown on this and the following page. http://home.maine.rr.com/rlma/Strider0601.htm No "Y" valve, no macerator pump. You have to pump by hand but, hey, we could all use a little exercise at our age. .... |
Question for Peggy
No, you don't have to have a Y valve. I have two separate discharges
from my holding tank. One goes to the macerator pump for overboard discharge, the other goes to the deck pump-out. No Y valve and completely legal. The pump can only be operated with a key switch, and that's legal as a lock-out. |
Question for Peggy
Peggie Hall wrote:
krj wrote: Peggy, I am re-plumbing my holding tank to include a macerator pump, Y-valve, and through hull. The easiest way to mount the macerator pump is to screw it into the outlet of the tank then plumb to the y-valve. Question is, will the pump out be able to suck through the pump or can I turn the pump on while pumping out the tank. Also is there any problem with pushing stuff through the Y-valve rather than pulling through the valve. It doesn't matter whether waste is pushed or pulled through a y-valve. However, the pump, whether manual or electric, should be after the y-valve. If it's ahead of the y-valve, it'll interfere with pumpout. A particularly strong pumpout might be able to pull waste out of the tank through the pump, but that much suction is likely to damage the pump. You could eliminate the y-valve altogether by specifying two discharge fittings in the tank...the hose from one goes directly to the deck fitting...the hose from the other goes directly to the pump, vented loop and overboard. That would allow you to connect the macerator directly to the tank--but I don't recommend it 'cuz it increases the risk of cracking the female fitting in the tank. Thanks Peggy, I guess I will go with the conventional hookup. krj |
Question for Peggy
I remove the thru hull handle and keep it cable tied to the hose. No way
anyone will confuse it with inlet valve and I'm covered if the Coast Guard boards. "Jeff" wrote in message . .. I've often wondered it this setup requires a "lock" on the pumpout to -- Roger Long |
Question for Peggy
Jeff wrote:
I've often wondered it this setup requires a "lock" on the pumpout to comply with 33CFR159. It doesn't...Only valves and/or seacocks connected to overboard discharge thru-hulls must be secured: 33CFR159 sayeth: (c) When operating a vessel on a body of water where the discharge of untreated sewage is prohibited by the Environmental Protection Agency under 40 CFR 140.3, the operator must secure each Type III device in a manner which prevents discharge of sewage. Acceptable methods of securing the device include— (1) Closing each valve leading to an overboard discharge and removing the handle; (2) Padlocking each valve leading to an overboard discharge in the closed position; or (3) Using a non-releasable wire-tie to hold each valve leading to an overboard discharge in the closed position. No mention of the pumpout line at all. However, inland may be another story. The Great Lakes and all non-navigable inland lakes are “no discharge” waters. They’re also a loooong way from the ocean. Since there's no possible way to legally use a y-valve or macerator to dump a tank, many states have made it illegal for vessels operating on these waters even to have one or both installed. When in doubt, check with your local authorities. Most descriptions of the reg refer to "preventing accidental discharge" or securing a "direct discharge" line. There are no adjectives in the wording of the CFR (which I copy/pasted directly from it above)...just "discharge." If the holding tank is considered part of the MSD Type III system, then it would seem its pumping system would be included. Any means of pumping sewage overboard IS included. The CFR defines "discharge" as: "includes, but is not limited to, any spilling, leaking, pouring, pumping, emitting, emptying, or dumping." The deck pumpout fitting would automatically be "secure" as long as no hose going over the side is connnected to it. -- Peggie ---------- Peggie Hall Specializing in marine sanitation since 1987 Author "Get Rid of Boat Odors - A Guide To Marine Sanitation Systems and Other Sources of Aggravation and Odor" http://shop.sailboatowners.com/books...ku=90&cat=1304 |
Question for Peggy
Sorry Peggie, what I meant was the onboard pump that was shown in the
picture, not the deck pumpout fitting. I had assumed that my setup, and Roger's, was legal because because it didn't come directly from the head, but a closer reading of the CFR shows, as you say, that any line that could be used to discharge overboard, is included and must be secured. Peggie Hall wrote: Jeff wrote: I've often wondered it this setup requires a "lock" on the pumpout to comply with 33CFR159. It doesn't...Only valves and/or seacocks connected to overboard discharge thru-hulls must be secured: 33CFR159 sayeth: (c) When operating a vessel on a body of water where the discharge of untreated sewage is prohibited by the Environmental Protection Agency under 40 CFR 140.3, the operator must secure each Type III device in a manner which prevents discharge of sewage. Acceptable methods of securing the device include— (1) Closing each valve leading to an overboard discharge and removing the handle; (2) Padlocking each valve leading to an overboard discharge in the closed position; or (3) Using a non-releasable wire-tie to hold each valve leading to an overboard discharge in the closed position. No mention of the pumpout line at all. However, inland may be another story. The Great Lakes and all non-navigable inland lakes are “no discharge” waters. They’re also a loooong way from the ocean. Since there's no possible way to legally use a y-valve or macerator to dump a tank, many states have made it illegal for vessels operating on these waters even to have one or both installed. When in doubt, check with your local authorities. Most descriptions of the reg refer to "preventing accidental discharge" or securing a "direct discharge" line. There are no adjectives in the wording of the CFR (which I copy/pasted directly from it above)...just "discharge." If the holding tank is considered part of the MSD Type III system, then it would seem its pumping system would be included. Any means of pumping sewage overboard IS included. The CFR defines "discharge" as: "includes, but is not limited to, any spilling, leaking, pouring, pumping, emitting, emptying, or dumping." The deck pumpout fitting would automatically be "secure" as long as no hose going over the side is connnected to it. |
Question for Peggy
Jeff wrote:
Sorry Peggie, what I meant was the onboard pump that was shown in the picture, not the deck pumpout fitting. I had assumed that my setup, and Roger's, was legal because because it didn't come directly from the head, but a closer reading of the CFR shows, as you say, that any line that could be used to discharge overboard, is included and must be secured. It's legal. Since there is no y-valve, wire tying the seacock handle and removing it, or removing the handle from the pump, or both, secures the system. Peggie Peggie Hall wrote: Jeff wrote: I've often wondered it this setup requires a "lock" on the pumpout to comply with 33CFR159. It doesn't...Only valves and/or seacocks connected to overboard discharge thru-hulls must be secured: 33CFR159 sayeth: (c) When operating a vessel on a body of water where the discharge of untreated sewage is prohibited by the Environmental Protection Agency under 40 CFR 140.3, the operator must secure each Type III device in a manner which prevents discharge of sewage. Acceptable methods of securing the device include— (1) Closing each valve leading to an overboard discharge and removing the handle; (2) Padlocking each valve leading to an overboard discharge in the closed position; or (3) Using a non-releasable wire-tie to hold each valve leading to an overboard discharge in the closed position. No mention of the pumpout line at all. However, inland may be another story. The Great Lakes and all non-navigable inland lakes are “no discharge” waters. They’re also a loooong way from the ocean. Since there's no possible way to legally use a y-valve or macerator to dump a tank, many states have made it illegal for vessels operating on these waters even to have one or both installed. When in doubt, check with your local authorities. Most descriptions of the reg refer to "preventing accidental discharge" or securing a "direct discharge" line. There are no adjectives in the wording of the CFR (which I copy/pasted directly from it above)...just "discharge." If the holding tank is considered part of the MSD Type III system, then it would seem its pumping system would be included. Any means of pumping sewage overboard IS included. The CFR defines "discharge" as: "includes, but is not limited to, any spilling, leaking, pouring, pumping, emitting, emptying, or dumping." The deck pumpout fitting would automatically be "secure" as long as no hose going over the side is connnected to it. -- Peggie ---------- Peggie Hall Specializing in marine sanitation since 1987 Author "Get Rid of Boat Odors - A Guide To Marine Sanitation Systems and Other Sources of Aggravation and Odor" http://shop.sailboatowners.com/books...ku=90&cat=1304 |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:06 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com