Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]()
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hello Roger,
May be, we are talking about different propeller types? ... I'm in no way an expert on this issue ... just an "enthusiastic amateur" that loves to sail with sails ... I did not make it clear, that my above arguments and experience were based on folding propellers ... i.e. from at two bladed folding propeller made by Gori to a three bladed Volvo folding propeller ... Sorry, I did not make that basic assumption clear from the beginning ... -- Flemming Torp "Roger Long" skrev i en meddelelse ... These kinds of discussion almost always take place without benefit of actual prop calculations. A two blade prop is inherently more efficient than a three blade. A single blade would be even more efficient if there was a way to avoid the vibration due to imbalance. Most boat have an engine that is too big for their prop. If you are just adding a third blade to such a set up while keeping the prop diameter the same, you are adding 50% to the power you can put into the water. Of course performance under power seems better. You are also adding 50% of the drag due to prop blades which isn't 50% of the drag due to prop since the hub is still the same. Prop blade drag may be a small enough fraction of total resistance that you can't detect it without careful measurements which are seldom performed. If your boat has a two blade prop that is already properly matched to the engine, adding a blade with a 3 blade prop of the same diameter and pitch may over tax the engine. Cutting back the pitch to produce a prop that absorbs the same horsepower will be similar to dropping a gear in an auto's manual transmission. When you want quick acceleration or power going up hills, it's an improvement. Flatter blade angle does increase sailing resistance though. My boat has a two blade prop that is a good match to the engine and pitched for good efficiency. If I replaced it with a three blade that had the same sailing drag, I would need to reduce the diameter to keep it a good match for the engine. In that case, the boat would be a little smoother but I wouldn't expect to see any significant difference in performance under power. It's already smooth enough to suit me so I see little reason to change. There are a lot of complex relationships and trade off's here. Just adding a blade isn't a magic answer for all boats. For most boats though, designed with too big an engine to impress buyers and too small a prop to save money, a three blade conversion will probably meet the expectations of the urban legend. -- Roger Long |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Unlubberizing the Single Screw Inboard, Part II | General | |||
A freewheeling explanation | Cruising | |||
Changing Prop inwater. (lessons learned) | Cruising | |||
What are the pros and cons of a folding prop? | Cruising | |||
Removing lower unit from 40 hp Johnson outboard - Help? | General |