Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#18
![]()
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Cal Vanize inscribed in red ink for all to know:
RW Salnick wrote: DSK inscribed in red ink for all to know: Budget max to buy is low $100k's. Annual budget would be in the neighborhood of $25-30k. Cap'n Ric wrote: Annual budget of 30K for a power boat isn't much unless you plan on not going very far. Or get a boat that is fuel efficient (ie not a speedboat) From what I have read, and talking to a lot of different cruiser in both power & sail bost, there isn't a whole lot of difference in the cost of cruising (unless you are burning fuel to make ten tons of boat & furniture plane). DSK I can only offer this direct, real-world comparison. Two years ago, we (and our 50' ketch, Perkins 4-236 4 cyl diesel) made a month-long trip from Seattle to Desolation Sound and back. During the same time frame, friends of ours down the dock made essentially the same trip in their 55' (?) trawler-style power boat. Not sure of the power plants, but they are also diesel. We burned 95 gallons of diesel over the course of the month. The power boat burned 895 gallons of diesel. bob s/v Eolian Seattle How much time was spent under sail? I don't recall, but "as much as possible", given that frequently a destination was targeted... I think that well more than half the miles were made under sail. Under power, we average 5.5 kt, and tho under sail, the speed variation was much greater, we probably averaged pretty much the same speed overall. One of our criteria was that if our speed (in the water) dropped to less than about 3.5 kt, we fired up the Perkins. Also, the PNW is an area of tremendous currents - if our SOG dropped to less than 2 kt, we fired up the Perkins as well. Frequently, the comparisons between power and sail are made with both boats under power. The thing that seems to be often left out in these comparisons is that with a sail boat, there is a lot of time when you are making miles with the engine switched off completely. This trip was in what is considered to be "inland waters" where the wind is less reliable than what you would find in coastal cruising. I have no experience there, but others might well say that our ratio of sail to power was lower than their experience. For example, friends of ours recently completed the trip from Seattle to San Francisco. Better than 95% of their miles were made under sail. What you will find is highly dependant on the area you intend to cruise, the time of year during which you intend to cruise, and a really indefinable quantity that is some combination of your enjoyment of the experience of being under sail, your patience, and your focus on the journey (as well as the destination). This is a very personal thing, and the great variety of boat types on the water reflects this diversity. Pick a boat that matches your personality type, or you will be forever frustrated, disappointed, and ultimately, disinterested in boating. Judging by the number of boats (of *all* types) that sit tied to the dock 40 or 50 weeks out of the year, not many people get this right... bob s/v Eolian Seattle |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
An essay on cruising boats | Cruising | |||
rec.boats.paddle sea kayaking FAQ | General | |||
rec.boats.paddle sea kayaking FAQ | General |