| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#9
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
|
Jonathan Ganz wrote: In article , Jim Cate wrote: I have. I think their garbage boats. You're just upset because you bought a piece of junk. Which models have you sailed, and under what circumstances? Have you sailed the current model (the 26M)? They include several fairly significant changes. If I told you, would you believe me... doubt it. Try me. Would you believe me if I told you that I know a major dealer of them in this area and even he thinks they're crap... doubt it. Shouldn't he consider some other kind of work? - There doesn't seem to be a great deal of profit running a Mac dealership. YEah, in very protected waters, in very limited situations. Good for you.. enjoy your Mac. Very limited situations, in very protected waters? I agree that the Mac isn't a good choice for an ocean crossing, and that their owners need to bs deleted It's nice when we agree. Johnny, seems to me that, if the Macs are simply a pile of junk as you keep saying, we would see thousands of them breaking apart in any winds higher than 15 knots or so, and we would see reports of hundreds of skippers and passengers drowned or stranded on capsized boats. Particularly since the Macs have been one of the most popular lines ever made, with over 40,000 of them sold, reports of failures should be all over the place. I spend a lot of time on the Mac discussion groups, and I read lots of reports and sailing mags, and I don't remember seeing accounts of any Macs that simply fell apart, or any on which the owners or passengers were drowned, etc., other than the one in which a drunk skipper rolled an overloaded Mac 26X with no ballast. As in any boat, repairs are sometimes needed, but the Mac owners keep on sailing their boats year after year, and when they want to trade, most of them seem to buy a newer Mac.- In any event, with that many boats out there, and if they are just a pile of junk as you say, surely hundreds of them would have simply fallen apart or capsized by this time. So, it should be fairly easy for you to cite some statisticsbacking up your ridiculous assertions. Could you do that for us, Johnny? - If you aren't just blowing smoke, that is. Jim |