I don't know what to say about this one.
 

I do: "Journalists who know nothing about boats should be prohibited from
writing about them." Since when is a seacock a "device which pumps water to
the engine"? John Coles of The Sun just lost his boat story privileges.

"WaIIy" wrote in message
...


http://www.thesun.co.uk/article/0,,2-2005450126,00.html

Dude, I thought that was the point.

"WaIIy" wrote in message
...
On Thu, 29 Sep 2005 14:52:55 -0500, "KLC Lewis"
wrote:

I do: "Journalists who know nothing about boats should be prohibited from
writing about them." Since when is a seacock a "device which pumps water
to
the engine"? John Coles of The Sun just lost his boat story privileges.

"WaIIy" wrote in message
. ..


http://www.thesun.co.uk/article/0,,2-2005450126,00.html


Man, you missed the whole point of the story on a nitpick.

In article ,
says...




http://www.thesun.co.uk/article/0,,2-2005450126,00.html


Looks like a Super Maramu. Shame.

On Fri, 30 Sep 2005 08:29:53 -0400, Gogarty
wrote:

In article ,
says...




http://www.thesun.co.uk/article/0,,2-2005450126,00.html


Looks like a Super Maramu. Shame.

Damn, I would have bought that sight unseen for 40,000 pounds. Now
it's got rising damp.

R.

In article ,
says...


On Fri, 30 Sep 2005 08:29:53 -0400, Gogarty
wrote:

In article ,
says...




http://www.thesun.co.uk/article/0,,2-2005450126,00.html


Looks like a Super Maramu. Shame.

Damn, I would have bought that sight unseen for 40,000 pounds. Now
it's got rising damp.

It's a $600,000 vessel at current exchange rates. I'd pay L40,000 just
for the winches.

for 40,000 pounds. Now
it's got rising damp.

It's a $600,000 vessel at current exchange rates. I'd pay L40,000 just
for the winches.

The couple in question are friends of friends, I`ll try to find out more,
will probably give him a call this evening.
Bob