Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
We've been using a (somewhat modified) Autohelm 1000 connected to our
Aries for many years now. Our arrangement works well. We use it when motoring. We also use it when there is sufficient wind to sail but insufficient for the vane alone to work well ( 4 - 8 knots or so across the deck for us). Most use a small tiller pilot and attach it to the pivot hinge device where the normal wind sensor vane 'would normally be'. (it won't work properly unless you remove the wind sensor vane.) We don't remove the wind vane. In conditions where the Autohelm + Aries arrangement is best, the Autohelm easily overpowers any wind force on the vane. If there is enough wind for the windvane to work, there is no reason to rig another electronic device to do the job. If you are motoring, you do not have to save electricity and you can use the autopilot, but in most cases the autopilot can do the steering by itself, without the necessity to rig the wind steering gear. As decribed above, there are conditions when we can make useful way under sail, but the vane alone won't work. The Autohelm 1000 + Aries arrangement draws much less power than our Autohelm 3000, and so we prefer it when passagemaking in these conditions as our solar panels alone can then supply sufficient power for all needs. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Garmins and autopilot interfaces | Electronics | |||
Windvane you can build yourself | Cruising | |||
Windvane VS AutoPilot Test review LINK | Cruising | |||
Autopilot fails on Raytheon ST5000+ with "No Data" error | Cruising | |||
Autopilot fails on Raytheon ST5000+ with "No Data" error | Electronics |