BoatBanter.com

BoatBanter.com (https://www.boatbanter.com/)
-   Cruising (https://www.boatbanter.com/cruising/)
-   -   HF antenna placement question (https://www.boatbanter.com/cruising/46716-hf-antenna-placement-question.html)

Don White August 2nd 05 09:58 PM

Me wrote:
In article ,
"Mungo Bulge" wrote:


I'll get there again sooner or latter. Maybe on my way back from Lat
69.4 N Long 132.96 W



Over playing with he Canuks, are you? Just make sure you get out befor
the Ice closes in.......


Me


Or is that off the northern coast of Alaska? We'll claim it for Canada
anyway.

Mungo Bulge August 3rd 05 01:12 AM

I don't mind the ice and cold, its the fact that I have to ask
permission to go out side in the winter that bugs me.
"Me" wrote in message
...
| In article ,
| "Mungo Bulge" wrote:
|
| I'll get there again sooner or latter. Maybe on my way back from
Lat
| 69.4 N Long 132.96 W
|
| Over playing with he Canuks, are you? Just make sure you get out
befor
| the Ice closes in.......
|
|
| Me



Jim Richardson August 3rd 05 10:03 AM

On Tue, 02 Aug 2005 19:06:47 GMT,
Bruce in Alaska wrote:
In article ,
Brian Whatcott wrote:

Oh, I feel such a dud, not even knowing trhat your anonymous buddy is
in fact a big man on the radio waves in Alaska.

Oh, I feel so bad.
Still, I *can* spell. Does that count?
:-)

Brian W


and what makes you thnk he is "My Buddy"....... I just happen to
have worked with him, 35 years ago, at Northern Radio Co. He
was more than compitant then, and still compitant now, well as long as
you take into account that he may be having "Senior Moments" these days.


as for your spelling..... quote from above...."knowing trhat your"

Just what word is that in the middle there? Does "thrat" count?


Bruce in alaska


Probably about as much as a competent speller would think... absent any
"senior moments"

--
Jim Richardson http://www.eskimo.com/~warlock
"Microsoft Wheel. Now with 8 sides for a smoother ride."
-- The Ghost in the Machine, in COLA

Brian Whatcott August 3rd 05 05:16 PM

On Tue, 02 Aug 2005 19:06:47 GMT, Bruce in Alaska
wrote:

In article ,
Brian Whatcott wrote:

Oh, I feel such a dud, not even knowing trhat your anonymous buddy is
in fact a big man on the radio waves in Alaska.

Oh, I feel so bad.
Still, I *can* spell. Does that count?
:-)

Brian W


and what makes you thnk he is "My Buddy"....... I just happen to
have worked with him, 35 years ago, at Northern Radio Co. He
was more than compitant then, and still compitant now, well as long as
you take into account that he may be having "Senior Moments" these days.


as for your spelling..... quote from above...."knowing trhat your"

Just what word is that in the middle there? Does "thrat" count?


Bruce in alaska



I'll trade three" trhats" to two of your (and strangely enough ME's)
"compitants"

You two must really get along well together when you meet?

:-)

Brian W



Heikki August 14th 05 10:56 AM

"Me" wrote:

There are few 3 Mhz Marine Frequencies, (Mostly in alaskan waters)
and most non-commercial MF/HF Marine Radio Users rarely use any below
the Maritime Mobile 4 Mhz Band.


I don't claim to be any sort of expert, but on the radio course I took, we
learned that 2182 kHz is "the international distress, safety and calling
frequency for radiotelephony". As far as I can see that is well below 4MHz,
and commonly used even outside Alaska.

-Heikki



Me August 14th 05 08:12 PM

In article ,
Heikki wrote:

"Me" wrote:

There are few 3 Mhz Marine Frequencies, (Mostly in alaskan waters)
and most non-commercial MF/HF Marine Radio Users rarely use any below
the Maritime Mobile 4 Mhz Band.


I don't claim to be any sort of expert, but on the radio course I took, we
learned that 2182 kHz is "the international distress, safety and calling
frequency for radiotelephony". As far as I can see that is well below 4MHz,
and commonly used even outside Alaska.

-Heikki



Actually you will find that in the USA, 2182 Khz is not used along our
Coasts for the simple reason that it's daytime coverage (Groundwave)
is easily covered by Remote Base VHF Highsite Radio Systems. This is
different then most of the European Countires as they tend to have
significantly less coastline to monitor, and usally it can be done with
just one or two stations in any country. All High Seas Distress Radio
Systems are now based on the IMO GMDSS Convention, which feature
multiple Maritime Radio Frequencies in the HF Band. In the USA 2182.0
Khz isn't even monitored on a regular basis by human ears. For the
North Pacific, 4125.0 Khz is moniotred by human ears, from Kodiak,
Hawii, and Comox BC on a 24/7 basis.


Me who understands the difference between the book,
and reality.....


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:53 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com