schlackoff writes:

I didn't think

that ain't news, dood.

On 16 Oct 2004 13:30:09 GMT, (JAXAshby) wrote:

schlackoff writes:

I didn't think

that ain't news, dood.

lol, enough said.:) Thanks for resorting to the oldest trick in the
book and proving once and for all that you're an idiot.

Steve

On 16 Oct 2004 16:49:33 GMT, (JAXAshby) wrote:

idiot? schlackoff, *you* are the guy who to a toy crossbow and go hunting 17
year old pirates with AK-47's. So, who is the idiot?

Lay off the booze before you post, will ya? Oh, and to answer your
question, you are.

Steve

From: (Steven Shelikoff)
Date: 10/16/2004 11:45 AM Eastern Daylight Time
Message-id:

On 16 Oct 2004 13:30:09 GMT, (JAXAshby) wrote:

schlackoff writes:

I didn't think

that ain't news, dood.

lol, enough said.:) Thanks for resorting to the oldest trick in the
book and proving once and for all that you're an idiot.

Steve

On 16 Oct 2004 13:29:06 GMT,
JAXAshby wrote:
jimmy, let me parse this for you.

"as a ------------------ weapon ---------------------------- of
(((((((((((((((((((((((((((((war)))))))))))))))))) )))))))))), the biggest
crossbows ever had a range of about 30
feet"

jimmy, that statement means if the damned thing is useless beyond 30 feet it
ain't a weapon of war. therefore, its [effective] range [as a weapon of war]
is 30 feet.


It doesn't matter how often you repeat it Jax, you are incorrect.


jimmy, let me explain this another way. An M-14 can pitch a round
something like 3,000 yards, yet its [effective] range is about 500
yards. Getting hit by an M-14 round at 500 yards is going to cause
some problems, while getting hit by an M-14 round at 3,000 yards is
likely to merely **** you off.


Not relevent to the claim you made regarding crossbows.



--
Jim Richardson http://www.eskimo.com/~warlock
Life is too short to be taken seriously.
-- Oscar Wilde

jimmy, reality is for people who can't handle drugs.

not sure I am happy to see you are beyond reality, but hey, enjoy dood all
those green and orange colors.

From: Jim Richardson
Date: 10/16/2004 9:02 PM Eastern Daylight Time
Message-id:

On 16 Oct 2004 13:29:06 GMT,
JAXAshby wrote:
jimmy, let me parse this for you.

"as a ------------------ weapon ---------------------------- of
(((((((((((((((((((((((((((((war)))))))))))))))))) )))))))))), the biggest
crossbows ever had a range of about 30
feet"

jimmy, that statement means if the damned thing is useless beyond 30 feet
it
ain't a weapon of war. therefore, its [effective] range [as a weapon of
war]
is 30 feet.


It doesn't matter how often you repeat it Jax, you are incorrect.


jimmy, let me explain this another way. An M-14 can pitch a round
something like 3,000 yards, yet its [effective] range is about 500
yards. Getting hit by an M-14 round at 500 yards is going to cause
some problems, while getting hit by an M-14 round at 3,000 yards is
likely to merely **** you off.


Not relevent to the claim you made regarding crossbows.



--
Jim Richardson http://www.eskimo.com/~warlock
Life is too short to be taken seriously.
-- Oscar Wilde