Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Boat shopping here in the Middle East has proven to be a pleasant
diversion. Beats getting shot at, anyway. As much as I look and research online, there are a lot of boats that are interesting. The venerable Tayana 37 is nice, the Shannons are good choices, and the Caliber 38 is a pretty good buy. And of course there are more, loads more. I have decided to stick with something under 40 feet; everything just gets too complicated in larger boats. And in that category, I keep returning to one boat- the Crealock 37. They are pricey. Real pricey. A mid-80's model is all I am going to be able to buy and still have cash in reserve for the inevitable "stuff that has to be dealt with." The boat is a beautiful craft, and while she is not nearly as roomy as, say, the T-37, she's plenty big for one or two people. I have never had the pleasure of sailing on one, but I understand they are very nicely balanced, easy to singlehand (as singlehanding goes), and they are not terrors around the docks. That the boats are well-made and respected is a plus; if I ever decide to sell I should get a good portion of the purchase price back. But the things are awfully expensive. Wendy |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
wendy wrote:
Boat shopping here in the Middle East has proven to be a pleasant diversion. Beats getting shot at, anyway. So does almost anything... at least that's what I hear! As much as I look and research online, there are a lot of boats that are interesting. The venerable Tayana 37 is nice, the Shannons are good choices, and the Caliber 38 is a pretty good buy. The Caliber is a very different boat than the Tayana. It's a fin keeler, flatter hull. They are built with bigger tanks and other provisions for long term cruising but I've heard a number of owners reporting problems.... but then no boat is perfect. FWIW I have sailed a Caliber 35 and found it sails better than the numbers suggest it should. I like the handling of such a boat much better than a full keeler, but that's an issue of personal taste. The Shannon and Gozzard boats are similar, full keelers, and usually rather pricey. ... And of course there are more, loads more. I have decided to stick with something under 40 feet; everything just gets too complicated in larger boats. And in that category, I keep returning to one boat- the Crealock 37. They are pricey. Real pricey. A mid-80's model is all I am going to be able to buy and still have cash in reserve for the inevitable "stuff that has to be dealt with." The boat is a beautiful craft, and while she is not nearly as roomy as, say, the T-37, she's plenty big for one or two people. That difference in roominess reflects the design and also to a large extent the structure of the boat. It's relatively narrow and well bulkheaded. ... I have never had the pleasure of sailing on one, but I understand they are very nicely balanced, easy to singlehand (as singlehanding goes), and they are not terrors around the docks. I've sailed the 31. It's one of the nicer sailing of the heavyweights. ... That the boats are well-made and respected is a plus; if I ever decide to sell I should get a good portion of the purchase price back. But the things are awfully expensive. Well, assuming that the current generation doesn't completely destroy the environment, rendering it impossible to sail the oceans; and the younger generation doesn't turn it's back on vigorous out doors pursuits; then yes you should be able to recoup a good price for the boat. And that makes a difference in the overall expense of having her. But you'll find that keeping & outfitting & maintaining a boat can still be expensive. IMHO an long term average of ~8% of it's value per year is a good figure... much more, if you have to hire others to work on her. Why have you zeroed in on the Crealock 37? Fresh Breezes- Doug King |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
DSK wrote in message ...
Why have you zeroed in on the Crealock 37? Why the Crealock… That's a good question, but my answer might be a bit nebulous. However, I will attempt to answer. Aesthetically, the boat is stunning in appearance. I know that sounds, on the surface, a bit of a silly reason to settle on a boat, and if it was the sole reason for purchasing a particular model, I concede that it would indeed be silly. It is so easy to get caught up in the nuts and bolts of boats- all the technical specifications and ratios, the carbon-this and the vinylester-that, and there is no doubt that these things are of great importance. Only a fool would give them cursory attention. I am sure there are boat owners for whom these details are the very aspect of boat ownership from which they draw the most satisfaction, and there is nothing remotely wrong with that. There is, for me, an indefinable aesthetic to sailing that cannot be spreadsheeted or calculated. The Crealock 37 embodies this aesthetic- again, for me. This sounds like the ravings of an incurable romantic I know, but if, at the end of the day, this obsession with craft that ghost along on the wind isn't a romantic one, then what is it? The boat is just so well designed and manufactured that I KNOW I can't go wrong with one (financial considerations notwithstanding ;-) I am single, and the boat has plenty of room for me- plus she can be easily singlehanded. PSC supports these boats regardless of year of manufacture, and that's a big plus- particularly so as the manufacturer is here in the US. I am a member of the PSC sailnet mailing list and I've heard a lot of good things about support; Bill Crealock himself lends advice on that list from time to time. While I have not sailed one, I have read from many sources how well balanced the boat is, and how well she fares in a seaway. I don't want to sit on the dock, and this boat is made to go to sea. But oh, are they expensive. |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
DSK wrote ...
Why have you zeroed in on the Crealock 37? wendy wrote: Why the Crealock… That's a good question, but my answer might be a bit nebulous. However, I will attempt to answer. Aesthetically, the boat is stunning in appearance. I know that sounds, on the surface, a bit of a silly reason to settle on a boat, No, it's a good reason. Mind you, it may lead to some compromises you might grumble under your breath about... just like marrying a woman because she is stunningly beautiful... but if you're happy overall, then I would be the last person to criticise. .... It is so easy to get caught up in the nuts and bolts of boats- all the technical specifications and ratios, the carbon-this and the vinylester-that, and there is no doubt that these things are of great importance. Agreed, but unenthusiastically. You can't simply say "All the technical aspects and details are equally important." A boat designed with this principle in mind would be a total failure. All boats are a compromise. That's why none of them do *everything* well. Choosing the 'right' boat is simply picking your top two or three priorities, finding a boat that fulfills them, and won't make you miserable over the 9,999 other things on the list. The boat is just so well designed and manufactured Hmmm... I don't want to start a flame war, but I find the Pacific Seacrafts... especially the post-buyout ones... uninspiring in build quality. The older ones are solid... and functional. OTOH, stacked up next to say a Morris or an Oyster... well... One very good thing about the PSC Crealocks is that the rig & deck layout is very good, very practical. Considered as a machine, it works well. And a wise man once said, "Utility is beauty." It sounds to me like you have looked at the practical side of things and have some pretty good answers. .... I don't want to sit on the dock, and this boat is made to go to sea. There you have it. But oh, are they expensive. So steal one.... wait, just kidding... but patience is also a virtue. Peace! Doug King |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
wendy wrote:
This sounds like the ravings of an incurable romantic I know, but if, at the end of the day, this obsession with craft that ghost along on the wind isn't a romantic one, then what is it? rhys wrote: Not really. I love the Shearwater 45's lines, but there are better boats. If I'm going to spend $400,000, that is. Exactly. .... Why, I could buy a Saga 43 or 48...probably an excellent sailing machine, but if I wanted a shuttlecraft I would've joined Starfleet, right? G For the money, I'm not tempted by one of those. You could get an Able or Morris or Baltic or Swan etc etc. At the end of the day, you've got to love the boat you are going to live aboard. That means (to a point), the "look" has to appeal on some level. There are a LOT of "pretty" boats out there today, but not so many that will increase your odds of living out a bad blow. If all else is equal, why not go for the prettier boat? Now, if J-Boats did proper cruisers...aaahh...that would be great! What's wrong with the J-32, the J-35C, the J-37, or (since you're talking about spending the money) the J-42? To my eye, they're not "beautiful" but they are certainly good looking and good sailing boats; plenty habitable enough (and also seaworthy by all accounts) to be a "proper cruiser." Fresh Breezes- Doug King |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 28 Sep 2004 10:04:03 -0400, DSK wrote:
What's wrong with the J-32, the J-35C, the J-37, or (since you're talking about spending the money) the J-42? To my eye, they're not "beautiful" but they are certainly good looking and good sailing boats; plenty habitable enough (and also seaworthy by all accounts) to be a "proper cruiser." =================================== For offshore cruising, I'd pick the J-44. It's fast, roomy and solid, not bad looking either to my eye. Perhaps a bit "drafty" for some venues however. |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 28 Sep 2004 10:04:03 -0400, DSK wrote:
What's wrong with the J-32, the J-35C, the J-37, or (since you're talking about spending the money) the J-42? To my eye, they're not "beautiful" but they are certainly good looking and good sailing boats; plenty habitable enough (and also seaworthy by all accounts) to be a "proper cruiser." Yes, yes, and yes...but I am enough of a belt and suspenders traditionalist to wish there was some sort of steel cutter- ketch with a skeg rudder that had some of the other attributes--like fine build--I see in the J-boats. I attend the boat shows, and I am very attracted to J-Boats because they hit most of my personal quality benchmarks regarding systems layout, handholds, backing plates, access to wiring and engine and so on. But they can't carry a lot of tankage and they are skewed a little too slightly to the "performance" side of cruiser. Which makes them great to sail...I've been on J-24s and J-29s in big air, and it's a hell of a sleigh ride, but I think I would have to look at (in a "money is no object" world) the J-160 to get into a comfort zone for world cruising that I could find in a smaller, heavier and no doubt pokier...but more appropriate for liveaboards with a kid...cruiser. They are very nice boats. So are Swans and Morrises, but those are too deluxe for my taste. I actually LIKE the idea of the racing J-boats, where you can power wash the all-plastic interior and then pump it out and run a heat fan to dry it out. Ah, simplicity! Most cruisers look like '70s rec rooms below...wood is lovely but is heavy and more work. R. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|