Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#4
![]()
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
wrote in message
... Lozman v. The City of Riviera Beach, Florida http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/opinions/ops/201010695.pdf ..................... Interesting. This decision indicates that there is a federal definition of 'vessel' that supersedes and doesn't take into consideration the Florida statutory definition of 'houseboat'. It doesn't say this and it also doesn't indicate this. In connection with the, What's a 'vessel'? question, it ruled merely that, for the purposes of the case, that is, that 'the point' at issue in this respect was merely whether for the purpose of determining what may be the subject of federal admiralty jurisdiction in a foreclosure of a maritime lien proceeding in admiralty, the federal law definition of 'vessel' and not what states variously may adopt and use for their state law purposes governs. Hardly interesting and not novel. If this is true then the State of Florida mandating a particular type of MSD for a 'houseboat' as opposed to a 'vessel' is flawed. This is a state law issue enforceable by the state as a matter of state law and does not implicate federal court admiralty jurisdiction in a maritime lien foreclosure proceeding prosecuted under federal maritime law. Ah, but that's where you're clearly in error. The fact remains that federal admiralty law takes precedence over any contradictory state statutes. The case in question demonstrates that. Here is something for your to read. http://www.law.ufl.edu/conservation/...sanitation.pdf It is long and some of it doesn't apply but to sum it up it allows states to create a houseboat designation for MSD device purposes only. It follows then that the federal law definition of a houseboat as a vessel first and foremost could contradict the state of Florida using the limited definition for MSD device purposes only to enforce the type of MSD required. Since federal law states a houseboat is INDEED a *vessel* no matter what as long as it floats on the water then the federal law that states a *vessel* must have either a Type I, II or III to be legally compliant is at odds with Florida's state law requirement that a houseboat have a specific type of MSD (Type III) Get the drift? Wilbur Hubbard |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|