![]() |
A taste of their own Frijoles
Tomorrow the new restrictions on travel to Cuba take effect. Up until
now, Cuban Americans could go to Cuba once a year, carry anything that they could pack in 140 lbs of luggage and spend $167/day. This is a right that no other American citizen has had for 40 years. Effective tomorrow Cuban Americans can only go once every 3 years, can carry no more than 44 pounds of luggage and can spend only $50 a day. Now the South Florida Cubans are screaming that they are being treated unfairly and that the new restrictions are "unconstitutional". My heart bleeds. At least now they get a taste of what they have inflicted on the rest of us. -- Glenn Ashmore I'm building a 45' cutter in strip/composite. Watch my progress (or lack there of) at: http://www.rutuonline.com Shameless Commercial Division: http://www.spade-anchor-us.com |
A taste of their own Frijoles
On Tue, 29 Jun 2004 12:24:58 -0400, something compelled Glenn
Ashmore , to say: Tomorrow the new restrictions on travel to Cuba take effect. I think travel restrictions are wrong. What business is it of my government where I may or may not travel? I can certainly see them saying something like, "We recommend you stay away from foo, and if you go there and get into trouble, you're on your own," but to forbid me from going somewhere? That's just wrong. |
A taste of their own Frijoles
Agreed. Land of the free indeed.
matt "Steve Daniels, Seek of Spam" wrote in message ... On Tue, 29 Jun 2004 12:24:58 -0400, something compelled Glenn Ashmore , to say: Tomorrow the new restrictions on travel to Cuba take effect. I think travel restrictions are wrong. What business is it of my government where I may or may not travel? I can certainly see them saying something like, "We recommend you stay away from foo, and if you go there and get into trouble, you're on your own," but to forbid me from going somewhere? That's just wrong. |
A taste of their own Frijoles
Matt Kocch wrote:
Agreed. Land of the free indeed. matt "Steve Daniels, Seek of Spam" wrote in message ... On Tue, 29 Jun 2004 12:24:58 -0400, something compelled Glenn Ashmore , to say: Tomorrow the new restrictions on travel to Cuba take effect. I think travel restrictions are wrong. What business is it of my government where I may or may not travel? I can certainly see them saying something like, "We recommend you stay away from foo, and if you go there and get into trouble, you're on your own," but to forbid me from going somewhere? That's just wrong. Just remember that when you head to the polls this fall. |
A taste of their own Frijoles
Matt Kocch wrote: Agreed. Land of the free indeed. matt "Steve Daniels, Seek of Spam" wrote in message Tomorrow the new restrictions on travel to Cuba take effect. I think travel restrictions are wrong. What business is it of my government where I may or may not travel? I can certainly see them saying something like, "We recommend you stay away from foo, and if you go there and get into trouble, you're on your own," but to forbid me from going somewhere? That's just wrong. Just remember that when you head to the polls this fall. Oh yeah, because the other party will do something differently. Tell me how going to the polls will solve this. Well, lets see... for President you have your choice of a Republican baby-boomer with a Yale education who is a member of the Yale "Skull & Bones" society, or a Democrat baby-boomer with a Yale education who is a member of the Yale "Skull & Bones" society. The Republican's father was a Senator, former head of the CIA, and former President, while the Democrat's father was just a diplomat. Seriously people! This is why we need a true multi-party system in the USA, with multi being more than two. At least you gotta admire GWB's dad for skydiving on his 80th birthday. soapbox mode off PS - I agree completely that it isn't right for the US govt to restrict citizens travel rights, no matter the issue at stake. Write your senator and congressmen. Later, Don W. |
A taste of their own Frijoles
Well... not going to the polls will certainly not affect it.
Bill wrote: Oh yeah, because the other party will do something differently. Tell me how going to the polls will solve this. |
A taste of their own Frijoles
"Harry Krause" wrote in message ... Matt Kocch wrote: Agreed. Land of the free indeed. matt "Steve Daniels, Seek of Spam" wrote in message ... On Tue, 29 Jun 2004 12:24:58 -0400, something compelled Glenn Ashmore , to say: Tomorrow the new restrictions on travel to Cuba take effect. I think travel restrictions are wrong. What business is it of my government where I may or may not travel? I can certainly see them saying something like, "We recommend you stay away from foo, and if you go there and get into trouble, you're on your own," but to forbid me from going somewhere? That's just wrong. Just remember that when you head to the polls this fall. Oh yeah, because the other party will do something differently. Tell me how going to the polls will solve this. |
A taste of their own Frijoles
On Tue, 29 Jun 2004 12:24:58 -0400, Glenn Ashmore
wrote: Tomorrow the new restrictions on travel to Cuba take effect. Up until now, Cuban Americans could go to Cuba once a year, carry anything that they could pack in 140 lbs of luggage and spend $167/day. This is a right that no other American citizen has had for 40 years. Effective tomorrow Cuban Americans can only go once every 3 years, can carry no more than 44 pounds of luggage and can spend only $50 a day. Now the South Florida Cubans are screaming that they are being treated unfairly and that the new restrictions are "unconstitutional". My heart bleeds. At least now they get a taste of what they have inflicted on the rest of us. You hit that one dead center, Glenn. If the restrictions make sense for me, they should apply to them as well. Personally I think the whole thing is misguided and pointless, but it does serve the purpose of transferring many dollars into the hands of the politicians from the hardline Cuban exiles. Castro is probably going to outlive most of his enemies, anyway:) |
A taste of their own Frijoles
The new regulations are only going to hurt the poor people in Cuba. As
always, those in power have everything they want. I would hope that after a few decades of embargo "experimentation" on Cuba, we'd figure out it's not going to work. We're all hugs and kisses with Russia and China, but have a hard on for Cuba? Come on! MMC "felton" wrote in message ... On Tue, 29 Jun 2004 12:24:58 -0400, Glenn Ashmore wrote: Tomorrow the new restrictions on travel to Cuba take effect. Up until now, Cuban Americans could go to Cuba once a year, carry anything that they could pack in 140 lbs of luggage and spend $167/day. This is a right that no other American citizen has had for 40 years. Effective tomorrow Cuban Americans can only go once every 3 years, can carry no more than 44 pounds of luggage and can spend only $50 a day. Now the South Florida Cubans are screaming that they are being treated unfairly and that the new restrictions are "unconstitutional". My heart bleeds. At least now they get a taste of what they have inflicted on the rest of us. You hit that one dead center, Glenn. If the restrictions make sense for me, they should apply to them as well. Personally I think the whole thing is misguided and pointless, but it does serve the purpose of transferring many dollars into the hands of the politicians from the hardline Cuban exiles. Castro is probably going to outlive most of his enemies, anyway:) |
A taste of their own Frijoles
Subject: A taste of their own Frijoles
From: Glenn Ashmore Now the South Florida Cubans are screaming that they are being treated unfairly and that the new restrictions are "unconstitutional". My heart bleeds. At least now they get a taste of what they have inflicted on the rest of us. Let me get this straight, they came here to escape political oppression from a communist dictator. He lets them return to cuba and then fly back to the US whenever they choose. THEY GO TO CUBA ONCE A YEAR FOR VACATION, HOW OPPRESIVE CAN IT BE? Our president has said they can only go once every 3 years instead of every year. They are very upset at our president for not letting them go back to the cuba, that they "escaped" from because of political persecution. These immigrants do not want US Citizens to be allowed to go to Cuba at all. They were upset when travel restrictions were relaxed for US citizens and let the president know it. He agreed and tightened the restrictions, they got upset because it applied to cubans as well. They think they are entitled to special treatment. Vote seeking politicians encourage this mindset. Its good to see them treated almost like US citizens. When they get fined $10k for going down and spending money they will find out what its like to be a real US citizen. Dennis |
A taste of their own Frijoles
Oh, the poor, poor people of Cuba. Perhaps they should take a lesson from
Castro and revolt. |
A taste of their own Frijoles
Subject: A taste of their own Frijoles
From: Glenn Ashmore Now the South Florida Cubans are screaming that they are being treated unfairly and that the new restrictions are "unconstitutional". My heart bleeds. At least now they get a taste of what they have inflicted on the rest of us. You have to wonder about the Bush administration. Can they do anything right? To **** off all the Cubans in Florida in an election year? Do they seriously think restricting travel like this is going to cause the fall of Castro and his government? They really should have the air quality in the White House checked. Something is making them think they can just have it their way. |
A taste of their own Frijoles
On Wed, 30 Jun 2004 22:49:04 GMT, "Gordon Wedman"
wrote: Subject: A taste of their own Frijoles From: Glenn Ashmore Now the South Florida Cubans are screaming that they are being treated unfairly and that the new restrictions are "unconstitutional". My heart bleeds. At least now they get a taste of what they have inflicted on the rest of us. You have to wonder about the Bush administration. Can they do anything right? To **** off all the Cubans in Florida in an election year? Do they seriously think restricting travel like this is going to cause the fall of Castro and his government? They really should have the air quality in the White House checked. Something is making them think they can just have it their way. They probably only ****ed off about half of the Cuban "exile" community. I heard an interesting news piece on Cuban American attitudes on this and related issues. There is a fairly sharp divide based on age and date of arrival. Later arrivals and those younger in age are much more moderate in their views. Moderation of views is not a winning formula in South Florida, though:) I was visiting with some Cuban Americans this past weekend and they seemed all for it, but I would classify them as exceptions to the rule as they were from a family that would not be welcome back in Cuba regardless of the laws. The real question is does this administration realize how much they have antagonized the sailing community?:) |
A taste of their own Frijoles
felton wrote:
On Wed, 30 Jun 2004 22:49:04 GMT, "Gordon Wedman" ...snip... The real question is does this administration realize how much they have antagonized the sailing community?:) Is there a sailing community? Politically, I mean. I think sailors tend to vote their 'real life' issues. The number of voters that cruise full time and would vote "sailing issures" are probably rather small, politically speaking. Just a fact of life, even if the cruising life is the best life of all.... Tom of the Swee****er Sea |
A taste of their own Frijoles
On Wed, 30 Jun 2004 18:37:32 -0500, Tom Shilson
wrote: felton wrote: On Wed, 30 Jun 2004 22:49:04 GMT, "Gordon Wedman" ...snip... The real question is does this administration realize how much they have antagonized the sailing community?:) Is there a sailing community? Politically, I mean. I think sailors tend to vote their 'real life' issues. The number of voters that cruise full time and would vote "sailing issures" are probably rather small, politically speaking. Just a fact of life, even if the cruising life is the best life of all.... Well, it is probably not all that large or influential, but I was in Key West a couple of weeks ago and there was more than a little grumbling about the increased enforcement of the laws against sailors. Mainly I was just trying to keep the post semi-sailing relatated:) Cruising World did have some sort of cover story on the Cuba crackdown in the last month or two, so it is on the minds of some. I would like to visit Cuba myself, but not enough to risk a felony conviction and a $50,000 fine. I suspect that things will change after the November election, regardless of who wins. This is election year politics. |
A taste of their own Frijoles
On Wed, 30 Jun 2004 22:01:19 GMT, "Garuda" wrote:
Oh, the poor, poor people of Cuba. Perhaps they should take a lesson from Castro and revolt. That might be the intent...squeeze from the inside. If there was an open border, a free exchange, there would be less pressure internally, and the entire Castro Revolution would most likely lead to another problem for the US...."What do we say to the kids?" |
A taste of their own Frijoles
"Den73740" wrote
Let me get this straight, they came here to escape political oppression from a communist dictator. He lets them return to cuba and then fly back to the US whenever they choose. THEY GO TO CUBA ONCE A YEAR FOR VACATION, HOW OPPRESIVE CAN IT BE? Well, if you were/are an MD you can make a million$$/year in the USA or a few thou a year in socialist Cuba. Other examples abound. Hot lick: make big bux here then vacation there - right? |
A taste of their own Frijoles
Yeah, remember they tried that one time and were given the high hard one by
CIA. The Shiite tried it too. So did the Kurds. And we let them all down. Ease travel to all US citizens and Fidel and co will be sitting in the corner wondering what hit them. The only reasons for the continued embargo is strong lobbying by FL Cubans, the voting block, and the complete lack of interest on the part of the rest of the US. MMC "Garuda" wrote in message ... Oh, the poor, poor people of Cuba. Perhaps they should take a lesson from Castro and revolt. |
A taste of their own Frijoles
MMC wrote: Yeah, remember they tried that one time and were given the high hard one by CIA. The Shiite tried it too. So did the Kurds. And we let them all down. Ease travel to all US citizens and Fidel and co will be sitting in the corner wondering what hit them. The only reasons for the continued embargo is strong lobbying by FL Cubans, the voting block, and the complete lack of interest on the part of the rest of the US. When you sit down and compare the past 50 years, Coca-Cola, Levi's and Rock and Roll have been more effective at bringing down totalitarian regimes than blockades and embargoes. The embargo gives Castro a scapegoat. Interaction breeds decent and gives the decenters courage to act. US culture is the most dangerous weapon on the planet. -- Glenn Ashmore I'm building a 45' cutter in strip/composite. Watch my progress (or lack there of) at: http://www.rutuonline.com Shameless Commercial Division: http://www.spade-anchor-us.com |
A taste of their own Frijoles
Very well put Glen.
"Glenn Ashmore" wrote in message news:o8WEc.8$4Z3.4@lakeread02... MMC wrote: Yeah, remember they tried that one time and were given the high hard one by CIA. The Shiite tried it too. So did the Kurds. And we let them all down. Ease travel to all US citizens and Fidel and co will be sitting in the corner wondering what hit them. The only reasons for the continued embargo is strong lobbying by FL Cubans, the voting block, and the complete lack of interest on the part of the rest of the US. When you sit down and compare the past 50 years, Coca-Cola, Levi's and Rock and Roll have been more effective at bringing down totalitarian regimes than blockades and embargoes. The embargo gives Castro a scapegoat. Interaction breeds decent and gives the decenters courage to act. US culture is the most dangerous weapon on the planet. -- Glenn Ashmore I'm building a 45' cutter in strip/composite. Watch my progress (or lack there of) at: http://www.rutuonline.com Shameless Commercial Division: http://www.spade-anchor-us.com |
A taste of their own Frijoles
"Glenn Ashmore" wrote in message news:o8WEc.8$4Z3.4@lakeread02... MMC wrote: Yeah, remember they tried that one time and were given the high hard one by CIA. The Shiite tried it too. So did the Kurds. And we let them all down. Ease travel to all US citizens and Fidel and co will be sitting in the corner wondering what hit them. The only reasons for the continued embargo is strong lobbying by FL Cubans, the voting block, and the complete lack of interest on the part of the rest of the US. When you sit down and compare the past 50 years, Coca-Cola, Levi's and Rock and Roll have been more effective at bringing down totalitarian regimes than blockades and embargoes. The embargo gives Castro a scapegoat. Interaction breeds decent and gives the decenters courage to act. US culture is the most dangerous weapon on the planet. US culture? hmm.... . Yeah I guess it is kind of dangerous. Almost an oxymoron. -- Glenn Ashmore I'm building a 45' cutter in strip/composite. Watch my progress (or lack there of) at: http://www.rutuonline.com Shameless Commercial Division: http://www.spade-anchor-us.com |
A taste of their own Frijoles
I suspect that things will change after the November election, regardless of who wins. This is election year politics. I do not expect loosening of anything if Bush wins re-election. That 2nd term he will not be restrained by any thought of needing to win another election and will ram through laws and regulations that make the current crop look like school house rules. It will be plunder and oppression on a grand scale. |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:23 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com