Bayliner 2655
 

I am looking to purchase the above mentioned boat, was wondering if anyone
out there have had any experience with this boat, good,bad or ugly. All
opinions welcome.

Topics of interest for me is over all rating that you guys put to this boat,
any problems...good points, bad points that sort of thing.

Thanks

Glenn

Bayliner 2655
 

On Wed, 11 Jun 2008 23:50:53 -0600, "Wade Carl Henley"
wrote:

I am looking to purchase the above mentioned boat, was wondering if anyone
out there have had any experience with this boat, good,bad or ugly. All
opinions welcome.

Topics of interest for me is over all rating that you guys put to this boat,
any problems...good points, bad points that sort of thing.

It's a bubble boat.

Here's some reviews.

http://www.epinions.com/reviews/Bayl...X_LX_Sunbridge

Bayliner 2655
 

Short Wave Sportfishing wrote:
On Wed, 11 Jun 2008 23:50:53 -0600, "Wade Carl Henley"
wrote:

I am looking to purchase the above mentioned boat, was wondering if anyone
out there have had any experience with this boat, good,bad or ugly. All
opinions welcome.

Topics of interest for me is over all rating that you guys put to this boat,
any problems...good points, bad points that sort of thing.

It's a bubble boat.

Here's some reviews.

http://www.epinions.com/reviews/Bayl...X_LX_Sunbridge

Those were fairly honest reviews. Bayliner is a good boat for protected
waters. It is not a bluewater boat, nor does the mfg'er pretend it is a
bluewater boat. It is a Bayliner.

The boats built after the mid 90's are better quality than those built
in the 80's, which could be real lemons. If someone is looking for a
day boat or a weekender for a couple, to be used in protected waters, or
close to shore on fair weather days, it can be a great boat.

As SWS said, it is a bubble boat, some people like the look, others hate
the look. The advantages is you have more room down below. The
disadvantages is it can be difficult to use the foredeck, getting up and
down the step steps on the 2655 to retrieve the anchor or when docking
can be very ackward for many. As someone who owns a bubble boat, which
has easy access to the foredeck, it can still be very slick when washing
the boat. I have seen some people screw up and actually wax the
foredeck. It will be very painful and dangerous when you slip and land
on your ass when you are rushing to grab a dock line.

Bayliner 2655
 

"Wade Carl Henley" wrote in message
...
I am looking to purchase the above mentioned boat, was wondering if anyone
out there have had any experience with this boat, good,bad or ugly. All
opinions welcome.

Topics of interest for me is over all rating that you guys put to this
boat,
any problems...good points, bad points that sort of thing.

Thanks

Glenn

It has compromises to be a cruiser at that size but if your use is mainly
fair weather boating they are not a big issue.

One of the main things to watch for on just about all the boats is being
under powered. A lot of manufacturers, in order to keep the entry price
low, will sell boats with the smallest engine they can get away with. I
think this one can be had with a 5.0 (305) small block. Once you load it up
with a 5.0 it probably takes forever to get on plane and has to be run
"floored" to get any speed. If you test drive a boat bring a pile of your
friends to act as "load". A 5.7 (350) would be the bare minimum for me on
that boat and a big block would be ideal. Don't let anyone tell you a
smaller engine gets better milage. The difference is not that significant
and the lack of performance will be quite noticeable.

Bayliner 2655
 

jamesgangnc wrote:
"Wade Carl Henley" wrote in message
...
I am looking to purchase the above mentioned boat, was wondering if anyone
out there have had any experience with this boat, good,bad or ugly. All
opinions welcome.

Topics of interest for me is over all rating that you guys put to this
boat,
any problems...good points, bad points that sort of thing.

Thanks

Glenn

It has compromises to be a cruiser at that size but if your use is mainly
fair weather boating they are not a big issue.

One of the main things to watch for on just about all the boats is being
under powered. A lot of manufacturers, in order to keep the entry price
low, will sell boats with the smallest engine they can get away with. I
think this one can be had with a 5.0 (305) small block. Once you load it up
with a 5.0 it probably takes forever to get on plane and has to be run
"floored" to get any speed. If you test drive a boat bring a pile of your
friends to act as "load". A 5.7 (350) would be the bare minimum for me on
that boat and a big block would be ideal. Don't let anyone tell you a
smaller engine gets better milage. The difference is not that significant
and the lack of performance will be quite noticeable.



I think the 5.7 is the largest available engine for a boat this size. I
have seen them add the DuolProp or Alpha 3 to improve the ability to get
on plane, but a 7.4 liter engine would take up too much space and
encroach into the space they use for the mid berth.

Bayliner 2655
 

"Reginald P. Smithers III" "Reggie is Here wrote in message
. ..
jamesgangnc wrote:
"Wade Carl Henley" wrote in message
...
I am looking to purchase the above mentioned boat, was wondering if
anyone
out there have had any experience with this boat, good,bad or ugly. All
opinions welcome.

Topics of interest for me is over all rating that you guys put to this
boat,
any problems...good points, bad points that sort of thing.

Thanks

Glenn

It has compromises to be a cruiser at that size but if your use is mainly
fair weather boating they are not a big issue.

One of the main things to watch for on just about all the boats is being
under powered. A lot of manufacturers, in order to keep the entry price
low, will sell boats with the smallest engine they can get away with. I
think this one can be had with a 5.0 (305) small block. Once you load it
up with a 5.0 it probably takes forever to get on plane and has to be run
"floored" to get any speed. If you test drive a boat bring a pile of
your friends to act as "load". A 5.7 (350) would be the bare minimum
for me on that boat and a big block would be ideal. Don't let anyone
tell you a smaller engine gets better milage. The difference is not that
significant and the lack of performance will be quite noticeable.



I think the 5.7 is the largest available engine for a boat this size. I
have seen them add the DuolProp or Alpha 3 to improve the ability to get
on plane, but a 7.4 liter engine would take up too much space and encroach
into the space they use for the mid berth.

That's too bad. The size difference is not as much as people think. A few
more inches on the front, sides, and top. I think you mean a bravo 3.
Volvo has a dual prop drive as well. Those will help and in combination
with a 5.7 probably work well on this boat. I'm guessing that adds 6 to 8
grand to the base price though. A 5.0 with an alpha II would suck.

Bayliner 2655
 

On Jun 12, 7:59 am, "Reginald P. Smithers III" "Reggie is Here
wrote:
jamesgangnc wrote:
"Wade Carl Henley" wrote in message
...
I am looking to purchase the above mentioned boat, was wondering if anyone
out there have had any experience with this boat, good,bad or ugly. All
opinions welcome.

Topics of interest for me is over all rating that you guys put to this
boat,
any problems...good points, bad points that sort of thing.

Thanks

Glenn

It has compromises to be a cruiser at that size but if your use is mainly
fair weather boating they are not a big issue.

One of the main things to watch for on just about all the boats is being
under powered. A lot of manufacturers, in order to keep the entry price
low, will sell boats with the smallest engine they can get away with. I
think this one can be had with a 5.0 (305) small block. Once you load it up
with a 5.0 it probably takes forever to get on plane and has to be run
"floored" to get any speed. If you test drive a boat bring a pile of your
friends to act as "load". A 5.7 (350) would be the bare minimum for me on
that boat and a big block would be ideal. Don't let anyone tell you a
smaller engine gets better milage. The difference is not that significant
and the lack of performance will be quite noticeable.

I think the 5.7 is the largest available engine for a boat this size. I
have seen them add the DuolProp or Alpha 3 to improve the ability to get
on plane, but a 7.4 liter engine would take up too much space and
encroach into the space they use for the mid berth.

Wrong. The 7.4L was available.

Bayliner 2655
 

JimH wrote:
On Jun 12, 7:59 am, "Reginald P. Smithers III" "Reggie is Here
wrote:
jamesgangnc wrote:
"Wade Carl Henley" wrote in message
...
I am looking to purchase the above mentioned boat, was wondering if anyone
out there have had any experience with this boat, good,bad or ugly. All
opinions welcome.
Topics of interest for me is over all rating that you guys put to this
boat,
any problems...good points, bad points that sort of thing.
Thanks
Glenn
It has compromises to be a cruiser at that size but if your use is mainly
fair weather boating they are not a big issue.
One of the main things to watch for on just about all the boats is being
under powered. A lot of manufacturers, in order to keep the entry price
low, will sell boats with the smallest engine they can get away with. I
think this one can be had with a 5.0 (305) small block. Once you load it up
with a 5.0 it probably takes forever to get on plane and has to be run
"floored" to get any speed. If you test drive a boat bring a pile of your
friends to act as "load". A 5.7 (350) would be the bare minimum for me on
that boat and a big block would be ideal. Don't let anyone tell you a
smaller engine gets better milage. The difference is not that significant
and the lack of performance will be quite noticeable.
I think the 5.7 is the largest available engine for a boat this size. I
have seen them add the DuolProp or Alpha 3 to improve the ability to get
on plane, but a 7.4 liter engine would take up too much space and
encroach into the space they use for the mid berth.

Wrong. The 7.4L was available.

Nah, I can't be wrong, because I really did think it was the largest
engine available.

A number of years ago, I owned a similar sized boat built from a
different mfg'er, it had a 5.7 and that was the largest engine available
at that time. It really was more than enough power for 5 adults. More
than 5 adults and the boat was too crowded, even for a day cruise.

I just checked Bayliner's web page, and the 5.7 is the only size
available today

I did not say it was NOT available, I just thought it was the largest
available. ;)

So, now that i know the 7.4 was available at one time, I would be wrong
if I said I think it was the largest available engine.

When was the 7.4 available on the 2655 and when did they discontinue
offering it as an option?

Bayliner 2655
 

On Jun 12, 9:20 am, "Reginald P. Smithers III" "Reggie is Here
wrote:
JimH wrote:
On Jun 12, 7:59 am, "Reginald P. Smithers III" "Reggie is Here
wrote:
jamesgangnc wrote:
"Wade Carl Henley" wrote in message
...
I am looking to purchase the above mentioned boat, was wondering if anyone
out there have had any experience with this boat, good,bad or ugly. All
opinions welcome.
Topics of interest for me is over all rating that you guys put to this
boat,
any problems...good points, bad points that sort of thing.
Thanks
Glenn
It has compromises to be a cruiser at that size but if your use is mainly
fair weather boating they are not a big issue.
One of the main things to watch for on just about all the boats is being
under powered. A lot of manufacturers, in order to keep the entry price
low, will sell boats with the smallest engine they can get away with. I
think this one can be had with a 5.0 (305) small block. Once you load it up
with a 5.0 it probably takes forever to get on plane and has to be run
"floored" to get any speed. If you test drive a boat bring a pile of your
friends to act as "load". A 5.7 (350) would be the bare minimum for me on
that boat and a big block would be ideal. Don't let anyone tell you a
smaller engine gets better milage. The difference is not that significant
and the lack of performance will be quite noticeable.
I think the 5.7 is the largest available engine for a boat this size. I
have seen them add the DuolProp or Alpha 3 to improve the ability to get
on plane, but a 7.4 liter engine would take up too much space and
encroach into the space they use for the mid berth.

Wrong. The 7.4L was available.

Nah, I can't be wrong, because I really did think it was the largest
engine available.

A number of years ago, I owned a similar sized boat built from a
different mfg'er, it had a 5.7 and that was the largest engine available
at that time. It really was more than enough power for 5 adults. More
than 5 adults and the boat was too crowded, even for a day cruise.

I just checked Bayliner's web page, and the 5.7 is the only size
available today

I did not say it was NOT available, I just thought it was the largest
available. ;)

So, now that i know the 7.4 was available at one time, I would be wrong
if I said I think it was the largest available engine.

When was the 7.4 available on the 2655 and when did they discontinue
offering it as an option?

Do your own research. I thought you were the Google expert.

Bayliner 2655
 

On Jun 12, 9:20*am, "Reginald P. Smithers III" "Reggie is Here
wrote:
JimH wrote:
On Jun 12, 7:59 am, "Reginald P. Smithers III" "Reggie is Here
wrote:
jamesgangnc wrote:
"Wade Carl Henley" wrote in message
...
I am looking to purchase the above mentioned boat, was wondering if anyone
out there have had any experience with this boat, good,bad or ugly. *All
opinions welcome.
Topics of interest for me is over all rating that you guys put to this
boat,
any problems...good points, bad points that sort of thing.
Thanks
Glenn
It has compromises to be a cruiser at that size but if your use is mainly
fair weather boating they are not a big issue.
One of the main things to watch for on just about all the boats is being
under powered. *A lot of manufacturers, in order to keep the entry price
low, will sell boats with the smallest engine they can get away with. *I
think this one can be had with a 5.0 (305) small block. *Once you load it up
with a 5.0 it probably takes forever to get on plane and has to be run
"floored" to get any speed. *If you test drive a boat bring a pile of your
friends to act as "load". *A 5.7 *(350) would be the bare minimum for me on
that boat and a big block would be ideal. *Don't let anyone tell you a
smaller engine gets better milage. *The difference is not that significant
and the lack of performance will be quite noticeable.
I think the 5.7 is the largest available engine for a boat this size. *I
have seen them add the DuolProp or Alpha 3 to improve the ability to get
on plane, but a 7.4 liter engine would take up too much space and
encroach into the space they use for the mid berth.

Wrong. *The 7.4L was available.

Nah, I can't be wrong, because I really did think it was the largest
engine available.

A number of years ago, I owned a similar sized boat built from a
different mfg'er, it had a 5.7 and that was the largest engine available
at that time. *It really was more than enough power for 5 adults. *More
than 5 adults and the boat was too crowded, even for a day cruise.

I just checked Bayliner's web page, and the 5.7 is the only size
available today

I did not say it was NOT available, I just thought it was the largest
available. *;)

So, now that i know the 7.4 was available at one time, I would be wrong
if I said I think it was the largest available engine.

When was the 7.4 available on the 2655 and when did they discontinue
offering it as an option?- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

That might make sense. The hp options on the 5.7 take it close to the
low end of the 7.4 so if you combine that with a bravo3 or volvo
duoprop advantage plus the weight savings of the 5.7 it may make the
comparison close enough that bayliner decided to drop the 7.4. Of
course it could just be that no one bought enough. I'd pass on the
5.0 though. None of the 5.0 variations had much hp. Twin v6's would
be cool but I'm guessing no way is there space for that plus the added
expense of a second outdrive would not sell in this price range.

Bayliner 2655
 

On Jun 12, 9:20*am, "Reginald P. Smithers III" "Reggie is Here
wrote:
JimH wrote:
On Jun 12, 7:59 am, "Reginald P. Smithers III" "Reggie is Here
wrote:
jamesgangnc wrote:
"Wade Carl Henley" wrote in message
...
I am looking to purchase the above mentioned boat, was wondering if anyone
out there have had any experience with this boat, good,bad or ugly. *All
opinions welcome.
Topics of interest for me is over all rating that you guys put to this
boat,
any problems...good points, bad points that sort of thing.
Thanks
Glenn
It has compromises to be a cruiser at that size but if your use is mainly
fair weather boating they are not a big issue.
One of the main things to watch for on just about all the boats is being
under powered. *A lot of manufacturers, in order to keep the entry price
low, will sell boats with the smallest engine they can get away with. *I
think this one can be had with a 5.0 (305) small block. *Once you load it up
with a 5.0 it probably takes forever to get on plane and has to be run
"floored" to get any speed. *If you test drive a boat bring a pile of your
friends to act as "load". *A 5.7 *(350) would be the bare minimum for me on
that boat and a big block would be ideal. *Don't let anyone tell you a
smaller engine gets better milage. *The difference is not that significant
and the lack of performance will be quite noticeable.
I think the 5.7 is the largest available engine for a boat this size. *I
have seen them add the DuolProp or Alpha 3 to improve the ability to get
on plane, but a 7.4 liter engine would take up too much space and
encroach into the space they use for the mid berth.

Wrong. *The 7.4L was available.

Nah, I can't be wrong, because I really did think it was the largest
engine available.

A number of years ago, I owned a similar sized boat built from a
different mfg'er, it had a 5.7 and that was the largest engine available
at that time. *It really was more than enough power for 5 adults. *More
than 5 adults and the boat was too crowded, even for a day cruise.

I just checked Bayliner's web page, and the 5.7 is the only size
available today

I did not say it was NOT available, I just thought it was the largest
available. *;)

So, now that i know the 7.4 was available at one time, I would be wrong
if I said I think it was the largest available engine.

When was the 7.4 available on the 2655 and when did they discontinue
offering it as an option?- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Reggie, don't fuel the stooges, please!

Bayliner 2655
 

My anchor snagged on one, but it was no trouble to pull it free.
JR


Wade Carl Henley wrote:
I am looking to purchase the above mentioned boat, was wondering if anyone
out there have had any experience with this boat, good,bad or ugly. All
opinions welcome.

Topics of interest for me is over all rating that you guys put to this boat,
any problems...good points, bad points that sort of thing.

Thanks

Glenn



--
--------------------------------------------------------------
Home Page: http://www.seanet.com/~jasonrnorth

Bayliner 2655
 

On Jun 12, 7:46 pm, JR North wrote:
My anchor snagged on one, but it was no trouble to pull it free.
JR


Another rec.boats regular looking to improve the quality and tone of
this group.

Bayliner 2655
 

On Thu, 12 Jun 2008 08:56:07 -0400, "jamesgangnc"
wrote:

That's too bad. The size difference is not as much as people think. A few
more inches on the front, sides, and top. I think you mean a bravo 3.
Volvo has a dual prop drive as well. Those will help and in combination
with a 5.7 probably work well on this boat. I'm guessing that adds 6 to 8
grand to the base price though. A 5.0 with an alpha II would suck.

IMHO, the ideal engine would be the Mercruiser 6.2L MPI with a Bravo 3
duo-prop. We have that combo on our Searay 270, and at 320 hp it is a
strong little engine. I believe that it's based on a stroked small
block.

The Bayliner in question has got to be seriously under powered with a
single 5.0L, as demonstrated by the one reviewer who is cruising at
4500 RPM. That is a sure recipe for premature engine failure.

Bayliner 2655
 

Thanks for all the responses. The reason I mention this boat, is because I
am looking for a trailerable boat, one that can house two to four people,
stopping at various small villages along the way, max. time would be two
weeks long.

The idea is to cruise up and down the west coast British Columbia, seeing
all the small villages that are there.

Do you guys think this boat would do the trick?

Glenn
"JimH" wrote in message
...
On Jun 12, 7:46 pm, JR North wrote:
My anchor snagged on one, but it was no trouble to pull it free.
JR


Another rec.boats regular looking to improve the quality and tone of
this group.

Bayliner 2655
 

No sense of Yuma?
JR

On Thu, 12 Jun 2008 16:52:28 -0700 (PDT), JimH
wrote:

On Jun 12, 7:46 pm, JR North wrote:
My anchor snagged on one, but it was no trouble to pull it free.
JR


Another rec.boats regular looking to improve the quality and tone of
this group.
HOME PAGE:
http://www.seanet.com/~jasonrnorth
--------------------------------------------------

Bayliner 2655
 

On Jun 12, 6:53�pm, "Wade Carl Henley" wrote:
Thanks for all the responses. �The reason I mention this boat, is because I
am looking for a trailerable boat, one that can house two to four people,
stopping at various small villages along the way, max. time would be two
weeks long.

The idea is to cruise up and down the west coast British Columbia, seeing
all the small villages that are there.

Do you guys think this boat would do the trick?


Yes. With a close eye on the weather, always erring on the side of
caution.Keep a flexible schedule and a willingness to "stay put" when
things are looking nasty, and stay out of the straits when conditions
aren't ideal. Pick up a copy of "Day by Day to Alaska" by Dale
Petersen. He has covered virtually all the coastal waters between
Seattle and Galcier Bay, Alaska in his trailerable C-Dory, ("Day by
Day"). The boat you are considering will be adequate for all but the
worst stretches on average or better days, but there are areas where
you will need to wait for much better than average conditions,
particularly in a boat of that displacement and design, to be
comfortable and safe in those waters.

Bayliner 2655
 

Chuck Gould wrote:
On Jun 12, 6:53�pm, "Wade Carl Henley" wrote:
Thanks for all the responses. �The reason I mention this boat, is because I
am looking for a trailerable boat, one that can house two to four people,
stopping at various small villages along the way, max. time would be two
weeks long.

The idea is to cruise up and down the west coast British Columbia, seeing
all the small villages that are there.

Do you guys think this boat would do the trick?


Yes. With a close eye on the weather, always erring on the side of
caution.Keep a flexible schedule and a willingness to "stay put" when
things are looking nasty, and stay out of the straits when conditions
aren't ideal. Pick up a copy of "Day by Day to Alaska" by Dale
Petersen. He has covered virtually all the coastal waters between
Seattle and Galcier Bay, Alaska in his trailerable C-Dory, ("Day by
Day"). The boat you are considering will be adequate for all but the
worst stretches on average or better days, but there are areas where
you will need to wait for much better than average conditions,
particularly in a boat of that displacement and design, to be
comfortable and safe in those waters.


Two people who are really friendly might survive such a trip. Four?
:)

Bayliner 2655
 

On Jun 13, 8:48Â*am, HK wrote:
Chuck Gould wrote:
On Jun 12, 6:53�pm, "Wade Carl Henley" wrote:
Thanks for all the responses. �The reason I mention this boat, is because I
am looking for a trailerable boat, one that can house two to four people,
stopping at various small villages along the way, max. time would be two
weeks long.

The idea is to cruise up and down the west coast British Columbia, seeing
all the small villages that are there.

Do you guys think this boat would do the trick?

Yes. With a close eye on the weather, always erring on the side of
caution.Keep a flexible schedule and a willingness to "stay put" when
things are looking nasty, and stay out of the straits when conditions
aren't ideal. Pick up a copy of "Day by Day to Alaska" by Dale
Petersen. He has covered virtually all the coastal waters between
Seattle and Galcier Bay, Alaska in his trailerable C-Dory, ("Day by
Day"). The boat you are considering will be adequate for all but the
worst stretches on average or better days, but there are areas where
you will need to wait for much better than average conditions,
particularly in a boat of that displacement and design, to be
comfortable and safe in those waters.

Two people who are really friendly might survive such a trip. Four?
:)- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Yes, it's the age-old misperception. "Sleeps Four" doesn't always mean
that 4 will be comfortable or have enough personal space when not
asleep. Has to be one of the major reasons people "trade up"- it
certainly isn't to enjoy the greater expense and fuel burn of a larger
boat.

Bayliner 2655
 

On Jun 13, 11:48 am, HK wrote:
Chuck Gould wrote:
On Jun 12, 6:53�pm, "Wade Carl Henley" wrote:
Thanks for all the responses. �The reason I mention this boat, is because I
am looking for a trailerable boat, one that can house two to four people,
stopping at various small villages along the way, max. time would be two
weeks long.

The idea is to cruise up and down the west coast British Columbia, seeing
all the small villages that are there.

Do you guys think this boat would do the trick?

Yes. With a close eye on the weather, always erring on the side of
caution.Keep a flexible schedule and a willingness to "stay put" when
things are looking nasty, and stay out of the straits when conditions
aren't ideal. Pick up a copy of "Day by Day to Alaska" by Dale
Petersen. He has covered virtually all the coastal waters between
Seattle and Galcier Bay, Alaska in his trailerable C-Dory, ("Day by
Day"). The boat you are considering will be adequate for all but the
worst stretches on average or better days, but there are areas where
you will need to wait for much better than average conditions,
particularly in a boat of that displacement and design, to be
comfortable and safe in those waters.

Two people who are really friendly might survive such a trip. Four?
:)

We once owned a 27 foot Searay Sundancer (with aft cabin) which we
spent a lot of time on, including weekends and week long trips on the
Lake. Our kids were fairly young when we owned the boat and things
became a bit tight even though the kids were small. After a few years
of owning it we up sized to a 32 footer. Even with that larger boat
we were glad to head back home after a week on it with the 4 of us.

Bayliner 2655
 

"Chuck Gould" wrote in message
...

Yes, it's the age-old misperception. "Sleeps Four" doesn't always mean
that 4 will be comfortable or have enough personal space when not
asleep. Has to be one of the major reasons people "trade up"- it
certainly isn't to enjoy the greater expense and fuel burn of a larger
boat.


My Sandpiper 565 claimed to sleep 4 people.
They had better be super friendly. as it wasn't much better than a pup tent
with a small table in the middle.

Bayliner 2655
 

On Jun 12, 7:52*pm, JimH wrote:
On Jun 12, 7:46 pm, JR North wrote:

My anchor snagged on one, but it was no trouble to pull it free.
JR

Another rec.boats regular looking to improve the quality and tone of
this group.

Hey, Jim, take a look at the quality of your girlfriend, Harry's post
about my little girl. What a low life pig.

Bayliner 2655
 

On Jun 13, 3:01*pm, wrote:
On Jun 12, 7:52*pm, JimH wrote:

On Jun 12, 7:46 pm, JR North wrote:

My anchor snagged on one, but it was no trouble to pull it free.
JR

Another rec.boats regular looking to improve the quality and tone of
this group.

Hey, Jim, take a look at the quality of your girlfriend, Harry's post
about my little girl. What a low life pig.

..... oh for ****'s sake, only cause he knew it would give him new
life, which you are doing here...

Bayliner 2655
 

On Jun 13, 4:21 pm, wrote:
On Jun 13, 3:01 pm, wrote:

On Jun 12, 7:52 pm, JimH wrote:

On Jun 12, 7:46 pm, JR North wrote:

My anchor snagged on one, but it was no trouble to pull it free.
JR

Another rec.boats regular looking to improve the quality and tone of
this group.

Hey, Jim, take a look at the quality of your girlfriend, Harry's post
about my little girl. What a low life pig.

..... oh for ****'s sake, only cause he knew it would give him new
life, which you are doing here...

Scott........this is a boating NG yet most posts from you, Loogie,
Reggie, JohnH and a couple of others seem to be asking folks to ignore
other folks.

If the tone of this NG is to improve the crap, bitching and whining
has to stop.