![]() |
Copper bottom
How about we make a lightweight copper hull shell, them resin the
inside with glass, etc. to make a boat that never requires antifoul? If it was copper welded, it might need only very thin copper foil and the cost played against other maintenance and advantages could be a savings. As I do not have any idea what this would cost to do I ask this forum for knowledge, if there is any available? It's essentially a substitute for gelcoat, no? Terry K |
Copper bottom
On Sat, 26 Jan 2008 08:36:35 -0800 (PST), Terry K
wrote: How about we make a lightweight copper hull shell, them resin the inside with glass, etc. to make a boat that never requires antifoul? If it was copper welded, it might need only very thin copper foil and the cost played against other maintenance and advantages could be a savings. As I do not have any idea what this would cost to do I ask this forum for knowledge, if there is any available? It's essentially a substitute for gelcoat, no? Terry K Folks who forget history, are condemned to repeat it etc., etc...." [some famous American guy] When the Royal Navy enthusiastically adopted an idea [of Humphry Davy's??] to galvanically protect their copper bottoms, the copper erosion stopped, but the marine growth started up big time. They canned the protection within months. Take home message: what don't dissolve, don't protect. Brian Whatcott Altus OK |
Copper bottom
|
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:06 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com