Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]()
posted to rec.boats.cruising,rec.boats.building
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
This seems to be the best thread in which to insert this...
George Huffman, of "The Dinghy Dock" newsletter, made a post in Renegades, offering his help as soon as his own vehicular challenges are resolved... Hi, George, and onlookers, It keeps getting better... The transportation issue isn't yet resolved - but there's a distinct possibility in the area. I just got a mail from my surveyor, ex-QC and Service Manager for Morgan during the entire time of building our boats. The short story is that if the detabbing is at the bulkhead and the bulkhead hasn't been compromised with oil products (fuel, oil, etc.), just wedging it open, flowing in epoxy and then screwing it down will rebond and, as my wife, and England-raised lady, sez, "Bob's your uncle!" I'm going to follow up to see if one *must* screw it back down (vs, e.g., wedging i.e. are the screws necessary for structural integrity, or just used to pull it tight?) to make it happen. If wedging will suffice, likely we won't have to pull the tanks, minimizing an already labor intensive project into something far more manageable. I'm already into project management mode, but Lydia's still in full depression, as the enormity of the elephant she has to eat is still too close to analyze. She doesn't do patience, or methodical long- term results. "Lord, give me patience - and I want it *right now!!!* - funny, but unfortunately true for her generally, let alone under these circumstances. Yet, all this will pass, and we'll have the most amazing stories to tell around the potlucks out in the Caribbean, or to the BoyScouts we might do charters for on their Extreme Adventure series "Sail the Keys" once this is all settled. Not quite Robinson Cruso, or the other which escapes me about the swiss family, but still entertaining, if you don't have to deal with the pain of the real possibility of losing your home and every one of your possessions. Yet, I'm struck by how fortunate we are in comparison, for example, of some of the Rita/Katrina/Wilma/Ivan survivors. We're truly blessed, including by such as you all. Love to all of you kind souls, most of whom we don't even know exist, having never even corresponded, let alone met... L8R Skip Morgan 461 #2 Disaster link: http://ipphotos.com/FlyingPig.asp SV Flying Pig KI4MPC See our galleries at www.justpickone.org/skip/gallery! Follow us at http://groups.google.com/group/flyingpiglog and/or http://groups.yahoo.com/group/TheFlyingPigLog "Twenty years from now you will be more disappointed by the things you didn't do than by the ones you did do. So throw off the bowlines. Sail away from the safe harbor. Catch the trade winds in your sails. Explore. Dream. Discover." - Mark Twain |
#2
![]()
posted to rec.boats.cruising,rec.boats.building
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Skip,
Regarding the "pulling it apart and flowing-in epoxy" -- yes, that will work with certain caveats: How clean is the material on either face which will be epoxied together? Oil-free is good, of course, but if the two surfaces pulled cleanly away from each other, leaving little glass on the wood or wood on the glass, they weren't bonded strongly-enough to begin with. Trying to rebond them with epoxy won't be very strong, and eventually that joint will fail again. New epoxy won't form a primary bond with old polyester resin. If, in pulling apart, plenty of glass was left in the wood or visa-versa, then the glue joint was as strong as it could have been. But in either case, rebonding without mechanical fasteners will be weaker than the original joint which failed. You might want to consider, rather than screws through the glass into the bulkheads, using through-bolted hardwood battens at least half an inch thick to help spread the load and reinforce that joint. If at all possible, I would want to laminate those battens into place, making a "wood-glass-wood-glass-wood" sandwich bolted and epoxied together. "Skip Gundlach" wrote in message ups.com... This seems to be the best thread in which to insert this... George Huffman, of "The Dinghy Dock" newsletter, made a post in Renegades, offering his help as soon as his own vehicular challenges are resolved... Hi, George, and onlookers, It keeps getting better... The transportation issue isn't yet resolved - but there's a distinct possibility in the area. I just got a mail from my surveyor, ex-QC and Service Manager for Morgan during the entire time of building our boats. The short story is that if the detabbing is at the bulkhead and the bulkhead hasn't been compromised with oil products (fuel, oil, etc.), just wedging it open, flowing in epoxy and then screwing it down will rebond and, as my wife, and England-raised lady, sez, "Bob's your uncle!" I'm going to follow up to see if one *must* screw it back down (vs, e.g., wedging i.e. are the screws necessary for structural integrity, or just used to pull it tight?) to make it happen. If wedging will suffice, likely we won't have to pull the tanks, minimizing an already labor intensive project into something far more manageable. I'm already into project management mode, but Lydia's still in full depression, as the enormity of the elephant she has to eat is still too close to analyze. She doesn't do patience, or methodical long- term results. "Lord, give me patience - and I want it *right now!!!* - funny, but unfortunately true for her generally, let alone under these circumstances. Yet, all this will pass, and we'll have the most amazing stories to tell around the potlucks out in the Caribbean, or to the BoyScouts we might do charters for on their Extreme Adventure series "Sail the Keys" once this is all settled. Not quite Robinson Cruso, or the other which escapes me about the swiss family, but still entertaining, if you don't have to deal with the pain of the real possibility of losing your home and every one of your possessions. Yet, I'm struck by how fortunate we are in comparison, for example, of some of the Rita/Katrina/Wilma/Ivan survivors. We're truly blessed, including by such as you all. Love to all of you kind souls, most of whom we don't even know exist, having never even corresponded, let alone met... L8R Skip Morgan 461 #2 Disaster link: http://ipphotos.com/FlyingPig.asp SV Flying Pig KI4MPC See our galleries at www.justpickone.org/skip/gallery! Follow us at http://groups.google.com/group/flyingpiglog and/or http://groups.yahoo.com/group/TheFlyingPigLog "Twenty years from now you will be more disappointed by the things you didn't do than by the ones you did do. So throw off the bowlines. Sail away from the safe harbor. Catch the trade winds in your sails. Explore. Dream. Discover." - Mark Twain |
#3
![]()
posted to rec.boats.cruising,rec.boats.building
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
If it were my boat and the joint were structurally important, i'd gain
access to the loose tabbing, cut away the separated leaf of tabbing, grind both sides of the joint and lay up new tabbng with epoxy. "KLC Lewis" wrote in message et... Skip, Regarding the "pulling it apart and flowing-in epoxy" -- yes, that will work with certain caveats: How clean is the material on either face which will be epoxied together? Oil-free is good, of course, but if the two surfaces pulled cleanly away from each other, leaving little glass on the wood or wood on the glass, they weren't bonded strongly-enough to begin with. Trying to rebond them with epoxy won't be very strong, and eventually that joint will fail again. New epoxy won't form a primary bond with old polyester resin. If, in pulling apart, plenty of glass was left in the wood or visa-versa, then the glue joint was as strong as it could have been. But in either case, rebonding without mechanical fasteners will be weaker than the original joint which failed. You might want to consider, rather than screws through the glass into the bulkheads, using through-bolted hardwood battens at least half an inch thick to help spread the load and reinforce that joint. If at all possible, I would want to laminate those battens into place, making a "wood-glass-wood-glass-wood" sandwich bolted and epoxied together. "Skip Gundlach" wrote in message ups.com... This seems to be the best thread in which to insert this... George Huffman, of "The Dinghy Dock" newsletter, made a post in Renegades, offering his help as soon as his own vehicular challenges are resolved... Hi, George, and onlookers, It keeps getting better... The transportation issue isn't yet resolved - but there's a distinct possibility in the area. I just got a mail from my surveyor, ex-QC and Service Manager for Morgan during the entire time of building our boats. The short story is that if the detabbing is at the bulkhead and the bulkhead hasn't been compromised with oil products (fuel, oil, etc.), just wedging it open, flowing in epoxy and then screwing it down will rebond and, as my wife, and England-raised lady, sez, "Bob's your uncle!" I'm going to follow up to see if one *must* screw it back down (vs, e.g., wedging i.e. are the screws necessary for structural integrity, or just used to pull it tight?) to make it happen. If wedging will suffice, likely we won't have to pull the tanks, minimizing an already labor intensive project into something far more manageable. I'm already into project management mode, but Lydia's still in full depression, as the enormity of the elephant she has to eat is still too close to analyze. She doesn't do patience, or methodical long- term results. "Lord, give me patience - and I want it *right now!!!* - funny, but unfortunately true for her generally, let alone under these circumstances. Yet, all this will pass, and we'll have the most amazing stories to tell around the potlucks out in the Caribbean, or to the BoyScouts we might do charters for on their Extreme Adventure series "Sail the Keys" once this is all settled. Not quite Robinson Cruso, or the other which escapes me about the swiss family, but still entertaining, if you don't have to deal with the pain of the real possibility of losing your home and every one of your possessions. Yet, I'm struck by how fortunate we are in comparison, for example, of some of the Rita/Katrina/Wilma/Ivan survivors. We're truly blessed, including by such as you all. Love to all of you kind souls, most of whom we don't even know exist, having never even corresponded, let alone met... L8R Skip Morgan 461 #2 Disaster link: http://ipphotos.com/FlyingPig.asp SV Flying Pig KI4MPC See our galleries at www.justpickone.org/skip/gallery! Follow us at http://groups.google.com/group/flyingpiglog and/or http://groups.yahoo.com/group/TheFlyingPigLog "Twenty years from now you will be more disappointed by the things you didn't do than by the ones you did do. So throw off the bowlines. Sail away from the safe harbor. Catch the trade winds in your sails. Explore. Dream. Discover." - Mark Twain |
#4
![]()
posted to rec.boats.cruising,rec.boats.building
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article . com,
"Skip Gundlach" wrote: I'm going to follow up to see if one *must* screw it back down (vs, e.g., wedging i.e. are the screws necessary for structural integrity, or just used to pull it tight?) to make it happen. If wedging will suffice, likely we won't have to pull the tanks, minimizing an already labor intensive project into something far more manageable. I suspect it's like doing glue & nail in woodworking: The nails are really there only to get a good bond; you could pull them after it's set up. But you want a really good bond.... Agreement with KLC's assessment on the "cleanness" of the break. Rough is better, polyester probably your best bet, fortified with something strong that you can shoot in with, say, a caulk gun. It does keep sounding better and better. Just a thought that you might toss around: to get pressure on the joints, you might intentionally put jackstands at those areas, intentionally a bit too "tight"; the hull will probably flex outward afterwards, pulling the bulkheads back in place. -- Jere Lull Xan-a-Deux ('73 Tanzer 28 #4 out of Tolchester, MD) Xan's NEW Pages: http://web.mac.com/jerelull/iWeb/Xan/ Our BVI FAQs (290+ pics) http://homepage.mac.com/jerelull/BVI/ |
#5
![]()
posted to rec.boats.cruising,rec.boats.building
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Feb 13, 3:13 am, Jere Lull wrote:
Just a thought that you might toss around: to get pressure on the joints, you might intentionally put jackstands at those areas, intentionally a bit too "tight"; the hull will probably flex outward afterwards, pulling the bulkheads back in place. Excellent thought. So far what iI can see (pictures, soon, I promise!) suggests it's already tight, as there's not a gap top/bottom of the line where it used to be attached. As to KLC's comment about reinforcement, if I could get to them all the way, the discussion of shims/wedges wouldn't be necessary. And, if I could get to them all the way, I'm enough of a belt and suspenders man that I'd likely grind it off and put on new, building up in exactly the same form as original (Pete provided me with the type of cloth used). I can't see how adding wood over an existing tab, and then going over it with FG/resin would improve matters; you're relying on the existing part, and not connecting the new to the bulkhead (I may not have a picture of what was intended, I realize). Thanks for all the commentary and support, in whatever fashion. Today it looks like we'll have a beater Suburban for use in transport and hauling; I'll know for sure by the end of the day. L8R Skip Morgan 461 #2 Disaster link: http://ipphotos.com/FlyingPig.asp SV Flying Pig KI4MPC See our galleries at www.justpickone.org/skip/gallery! Follow us at http://groups.google.com/group/flyingpiglog and/or http://groups.yahoo.com/group/TheFlyingPigLog The Society for the Preservation of Tithesis commends your ebriated and scrutible use of delible and defatigable, which are gainly, sipid and couth. We are gruntled and consolate that you have the ertia and eptitude to choose such putably pensible tithesis, which we parage. Stamp out Sesquipedalianism -- Jere Lull Xan-a-Deux ('73 Tanzer 28 #4 out of Tolchester, MD) Xan's NEW Pages:http://web.mac.com/jerelull/iWeb/Xan/ Our BVI FAQs (290+ pics)http://homepage.mac.com/jerelull/BVI/ |
#6
![]()
posted to rec.boats.cruising,rec.boats.building
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Skip Gundlach" wrote in message ups.com... As to KLC's comment about reinforcement, if I could get to them all the way, the discussion of shims/wedges wouldn't be necessary. And, if I could get to them all the way, I'm enough of a belt and suspenders man that I'd likely grind it off and put on new, building up in exactly the same form as original (Pete provided me with the type of cloth used). I can't see how adding wood over an existing tab, and then going over it with FG/resin would improve matters; you're relying on the existing part, and not connecting the new to the bulkhead (I may not have a picture of what was intended, I realize). Thanks for all the commentary and support, in whatever fashion. Today it looks like we'll have a beater Suburban for use in transport and hauling; I'll know for sure by the end of the day. L8R Skip Skip, My outline may have left out steps that I have clearly in mind, but didn't translate into dots on the screen. The way I see it, yes -- you could grind off all the old tabbing and install it new, but then you would have TWO secondary/mechanical bonds, rather than the one secondary (tabbing to bulkhead) and one primary (tabbing to hull, laid-up when the resin was still fresh and molecularly active. My method does rely upon glue (epoxy) between the bulkhead and old tabbing, clamped together with the bolts and battens, all laminated together into one thick tabbing. Unfortunately, if you don't have the access, you don't have the access. So now the question becomes, can you ever make it strong enough without that access? |
#7
![]()
posted to rec.boats.cruising,rec.boats.building
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 13 Feb 2007 13:00:08 -0600, "KLC Lewis"
wrote: My method does rely upon glue (epoxy) between the bulkhead and old tabbing, clamped together with the bolts and battens In addition to using epoxy resin (instead of polyester), I recommend thickening the resin with chopped glass fibers to improve its strength. This is a difficult repair without having full access on at least one side of the bulkhead. |
#8
![]()
posted to rec.boats.cruising,rec.boats.building
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article , "KLC Lewis"
wrote: So now the question becomes, can you ever make it strong enough without that access? How could you ever know how strong it was? You'll never reach 100% new as-built strength. But even if you did by some chance, you'll never be able to KNOW exactly how strong the repair is. You'll have to take her out in progressivly more stressful conditions and each time there will be that knot in your gut. Will it take 5' seas? 6' seas? 7' seas pounding for day after day? Even if it does, you'll not know if the next wave will be the one. You'll crawl around in the bildge after each short trip looking for problems that really can't be seen. This is not what the dream was about. No, it will never be a Morgan again. Not so that you can trust her just because there is a long history of Morgans that are built just like her that have proven themselves countless times. That was why you bought a Morgan in the first place. The confidence that she'll be able to handle anything the sea throws at her. That's gone for good now. There will always be a nagging doubt. You'll live in fear of every new set of conditions, only trusting her if conditions are just perfect, and they never are. Over time your love for her will turn to hate just from this nagging mistrust. You'll find more and more excuses to leave her at the dock. Afraid each and every time you leave a port. No, even a horse you dearly love should be put down when the time comes. Do it swiftly and without regrets. Good luck, Paul -- Remove Before Flight |
#9
![]()
posted to rec.boats.cruising,rec.boats.building
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Jere Lull wrote:
I suspect it's like doing glue & nail in woodworking: The nails are really there only to get a good bond; you could pull them after it's set up. But you want a really good bond.... Epoxies are not great in peel. The screws would help prevent that - and act as shear pins. Screw it.... Ricahrd |
#10
![]()
posted to rec.boats.building
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Skip Gundlach wrote:
The short story is that if the detabbing is at the bulkhead and the bulkhead hasn't been compromised with oil products (fuel, oil, etc.), just wedging it open, flowing in epoxy and then screwing it down will rebond and, as my wife, and England-raised lady, sez, "Bob's your uncle!" That sounds reasonable if as you say the bond area has not been contaminated. If the gap is large, consider "Plexus" a thick gap filling adhesive widely used in new boat construction. If the gap is thin, temporarily wedging the tabbing open and pouring in liberal amounts of epoxy, and temporarily screwing the tabbing back to the bulkheads will do it. On our 30' last boat, the survey noted a few instances of de-bonded tabbing. In my inexperience, I took an angle grinder and got in lockers, closets, and under bunks and ground out almost all the tabbing and re-tabbed with new material. Lots of work but it didnt' take that long- about 1 month working most evenings after work. If you do have to re-tab some areas, use epoxy; the fumes alone from polyester in close quarters will be unpleasant to say the least. The outside pics don't seem that bad, and retabbing bulkheads etc. don't sound that bad, except for the areas of limited access like the refrigerator. In those areas where you can get at one side, lots of tabbing on the one side is nearly as good as both sides and is probably quite acceptable. If you think the boat is still worthwhile don't let the insurance company scrap her on you. Negotiate, bargain, etc! Good luck to you, Evan Gatehouse |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|