Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]()
posted to rec.boats,rec.boats.cruising,rec.boats.building,uk.rec.boats.motor
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
That's my point. It was misguided --inefficient-- to force manufacturers to
meet standards before the technology was developed. And I don't think for a moment that the stiff initial regs caused the technology to be developed any sooner. Furthermore, it was counterproductive to prevent (which the feds did) the major car makers from pooling their resources to develop this technology. Anti trust laws, you know. "James Sweet" wrote in message news:ah1bh.10103$7a2.1829@trndny06... Well regardless, the technology caught up and cars get roughly double the fuel economy as they got in the 70s, have much cleaner emissions, and many are far more powerful too. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
2 stroke / 4 stroke advice | General | |||
Yamaha 50 four stroke vs 60 two stroke | General | |||
What does MIT say about ionization and lightning?? | ASA | |||
Why Ficht failed & why 2stroke OBs are thankfully gone (almost:-)) | General | |||
2 stroke vs. 4 stroke?? | General |