Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]()
posted to rec.boats,rec.boats.cruising,rec.boats.building,uk.rec.boats.motor
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "James Sweet" wrote in message news:ah1bh.10103$7a2.1829@trndny06... Garland Gray II wrote: Exactly. You can't force technology faster just to meet an arbitrary goal dreamed up by a beaurocrat. And the sick thing about it is that whoever dreamed up those regs goes to bed thinking "I saved the world again today". Well regardless, the technology caught up and cars get roughly double the fuel economy as they got in the 70s, have much cleaner emissions, and many are far more powerful too. The more economy is mostly from smaller cars. My 1964 300 hp 327 Impala SS got about 16.5 mpg on average. City and highway. My slightly heavier, way more technology 1999 Expedition got 14.5 mpg average. But MTBE cost about 10% milage, while reducing air pollution about 6%. Not a large combined number. while at the same time, causing mass ground water pollution. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
2 stroke / 4 stroke advice | General | |||
Yamaha 50 four stroke vs 60 two stroke | General | |||
What does MIT say about ionization and lightning?? | ASA | |||
Why Ficht failed & why 2stroke OBs are thankfully gone (almost:-)) | General | |||
2 stroke vs. 4 stroke?? | General |