Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]()
posted to rec.boats.building
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Terry K wrote:
dazed and confuzzed wrote: Terry K wrote: Fuel efficiency? The hot exhaust from the primary / combustion cylinder would go into the expansion stroke of the larger secondary cylinder, snip "Modern" i.c. engines lose much of the fuel energy in hot exhaust and water cooled blocks, let alone incompletely combusted CO gas. This energy, if recovered, might save 50% or more of the energy lost, about 33% increase in efficiency. I cannot see why the same principal would not work in a diesel ignition engine. Such an "internal steam engine" could reduce the consumption and price of fuel. I guess that's why we haven't heard of it. One difficulty is that an otto cycle (four stroke) only produces exhaust every second revolution, so the secondary expansion cylinder might want to be geared 1:2, or it's valve(s) timed to acommodate that fact, or with an intermediate pressure vessel between the cylinders. It's exhaust valve would close every second revolution, timed to the exhaust of the primary exhaust stroke. A two stroke engine would not need such complication, but it's secondary piston crank angle would be offset so as to lengthen the primary power stroke to a full 1/2 revolution power / expansion stroke, as opposed to the common 1/4 revolution power stroke. Alternatively, If two four stroke cylinders were timed and valved so as to feed only one secondary expansion cylinder which injected water to expand and cool the exhaust gas, etc, then the power output stroke of such a three cyliner engine would be 360 degrees in total as opposed to two, one quarter revolution power strokes. Two such engines connected together for balance and timed right might show very good torque figures at near stall speed, like steam engines do. It would also balance well. The only issue that I see for your idea is that the engine you propose would be fairly heavy for it's power output, and would be best operated at significantly slower speeds than current gasoline and diesel engines normally operate at. Even diesels (modern ones) operate at around 1500-2000 rpm. Yours would be happiest closer to 500 RPM. Thank you for your assistance. I don't see why, really. See the addendum above. It might work out, y'know. Most cars never need all the potential power they lug around, and every pound of engine and fuel saved, is a pound that does not sap the delta-vee. Another huge saving in fuel efficiency could be promoted at home, a reversible air conditioner / heater might get used more to heat than to cool over the course of a year, saving considerable heating fuel cost, if mainly only during the spring and fall.. Why have we not heard of it? -- "TAANSTAFL" I don't recognize that acronym. Terry K There Ain't No Such Thing As A Free Lunch -- “TAANSTAFL” __________________________________________________ __________________________ "A prudent man foresees the difficulties ahead and prepares for them; The simpleton goes blindly on and suffers the consequences." - Proverbs 22:3 __________________________________________________ __________________________ |
#2
![]()
posted to rec.boats.building
|
|||
|
|||
![]() -- "TAANSTAFL" I don't recognize that acronym. Terry K There Ain't No Such Thing As A Free Lunch Is that like "There ain't no free cheese in a rat trap?" Of course there is,,,,,,,but the second rat gets it! Gordon |
#3
![]()
posted to rec.boats.building
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Gordon wrote:
Is that like "There ain't no free cheese in a rat trap?" Of course there is,,,,,,,but the second rat gets it! The second rat gets the cheese. There is a free lunch, but not for everybody, and getting it ain't easy. You got to sleep in, climb over the unhappy competition, and study your method well if you want to continue successfully. An internal steam engine could work. Even if it was easy and efficient, you might have to fight the the first rat as he weakens and dies to keep a grip on the rat trap and it's bait. The fuel supply problem will be beaten the day that a significant number of people decide to drive mopeds or trikes to save gas. This they will not do so long as they are likely to get rained on. Why not an airbag outside the driver to keep the rain off and streamline the vehicle? A double expansion 5 HP internal combustion steam engine could charge the batteries while you pedal or park, for that matter. Why not recharge at home for an electric 50 Km range town trike you can pedal home to plug in and charge for tomorrow, all for less than health club membership and cabfare to and from the excercise machines and drive through fast food joints? Ask the fatties why there is an energy shortage. Ask the restraunteurs why they cannot satisfy them selves with half price, half sized kids' servings on demand, even for adults? Terry k |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Nice boat........ | General | |||
INFO FOR NEWBIES | ASA |